Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shia Islam for Dummies: Ask Those who Know

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by شمله ور خراساني View Post
    lol,

    this is the logical conclusion of any sunni shi'a debate. Shi'ites accusing sunnis of being naseebis.
    please read the hadith of ur history books.... u cant claim ignorence now!
    Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
      Blah blah blah blah.... u shia of Muawiyya and Yazeed will say and do anything to ignore ur own history books!
      Is there no moderator to give him a ban or something? It is getting pretty desperate

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Abu Hurayrah View Post
        Is there no moderator to give him a ban or something? It is getting pretty desperate
        Ur the 1 who needs a ban... learn what nasebee means ... then come and talk
        btw love ur user name... cldnt expect anything less from 1 who models himself on one who churned out so many hadith despite spending only 2 and half yrs with prophet.... 1 who was viewed negatively by many around the prophet... many of the hadith he recounted where "witnessed" by himself only
        Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


        Comment


        • read this u shia of muawiyya


          Narrated Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas:

          Muawiyah, the son of Abu Sufyan, give order to Sa'd, and told him:
          "What prevents you that you are refraining from cursing Abu Turab
          (nickname of Ali)?" Sa'd replied: "Don't you remember that the Prophet
          said three things about (the virtue of) Ali? So I will never curse
          Ali."

          Sunni reference: Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of
          Virtues of Ali, Arabic, v4, p1871, Tradition #32.


          muawiyya was governor of Syria.... here he is actually questioning why a sahaba isnt cursing Imam Ali.... This cursing was only banned by one of Muawiyyas decendents.... a good apple in a bunch of rotten ones
          Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
            read this u shia of muawiyya


            Narrated Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas:

            Muawiyah, the son of Abu Sufyan, give order to Sa'd, and told him:
            "What prevents you that you are refraining from cursing Abu Turab
            (nickname of Ali)?" Sa'd replied: "Don't you remember that the Prophet
            said three things about (the virtue of) Ali? So I will never curse
            Ali."

            Sunni reference: Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of
            Virtues of Ali, Arabic, v4, p1871, Tradition #32.


            muawiyya was governor of Syria.... here he is actually questioning why a sahaba isnt cursing Imam Ali.... This cursing was only banned by one of Muawiyyas decendents.... a good apple in a bunch of rotten ones


            LOL! Thats very strong evidence. What should we do now? become shi'ites based on what is written in a book that is considered as not legitimate by shi'ites?
            [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
            [/URL]
            [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
            [/URL][/SIZE]
            Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

            Comment


            • I think you and your ayatullah's can't even become the dust from the feet of Abu Hurayrah, the one who exposes you, you tend to hate the most. That is human.

              Volume 004, Book 056, Hadith Number 841.
              Narated By Abu Huraira : I said, "O Allah's Apostle! I hear many narrations from you but I forget them." He said, "Spread your covering sheet." I spread my sheet and he moved both his hands as if scooping something and emptied them in the sheet and said, "Wrap it." I wrapped it round my body, and since then I have never forgotten a single Hadith.


              Timbaktu bro, you are right, but that is already discussed in this topic.

              LOL! Thats very strong evidence. What should we do now? become shi'ites based on what is written in a book that is considered as not legitimate by shi'ites?
              They are bringing up personal affairs of the Sahaba from the past 1400 years. Once a scholar said ''Ali (ra) after 6 months accepted Abu Bakr (ra), but the Shia did not accepted him after 1400 years. And it is in fact not only that, it is a lie which they call imamah, and quote the Qur'an as evidence.

              Last edited by Guest; 08-30-2010, 04:25 PM.

              Comment


              • no its ur book... its being used 2 refute u! U believe that criticism of the sahaba isnt allowed.... READ now IN UR OWN books why Certain "SAHABA" are looked down on
                UR BOOK shows that some acted in an unislamic manner... a book u regard as 100% authentic...
                Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                Comment


                • Originally posted by Abu Hurayrah View Post
                  I think you and your ayatullah's can't even become the dust from the feet of Abu Hurayrah, the one who exposes you, you tend to hate the most. That is human.

                  Volume 004, Book 056, Hadith Number 841.
                  Narated By Abu Huraira : I said, "O Allah's Apostle! I hear many narrations from you but I forget them." He said, "Spread your covering sheet." I spread my sheet and he moved both his hands as if scooping something and emptied them in the sheet and said, "Wrap it." I wrapped it round my body, and since then I have never forgotten a single Hadith.


                  Timbaktu bro, you are right, but that is already discussed in this topic.

                  YAWN.... Abu Haurarayra bigging himself up...
                  Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
                    no its ur book... its being used 2 refute u! U believe that criticism of the sahaba isnt allowed.... READ now IN UR OWN books why Certain "SAHABA" are looked down on
                    UR BOOK shows that some acted in an unislamic manner... a book u regard as 100% authentic...
                    but if our books contain the truth, then you must also accept other narrations that are on "our" books.

                    So why should we only believe those arguments that are used by Shi'ites and disbelieve in others that contradict shi'ite dogma?

                    Explain this to me.

                    Its either this or that. Either the books like Sahih Muslim and Sahih Bukhari are both false and lies against "ahlul bayt" or everything is true and correct.

                    It can't be that only some narrations that fit the Shi'ite agenda are correct, and everything else is false.
                    [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
                    [/URL]
                    [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
                    [/URL][/SIZE]
                    Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

                    Comment


                    • ^ Bukhari is not regarded as Sahih by some.... for those who DO regard it as such... it is used 2 proove them wrong since this is the source that they themselves accept... thats the rules of debate/...... evidently u are in ignorence of that
                      Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                      Comment


                      • "My sahaba will be taken to the fire [of hell], whereupon I shall plead: "O Lord! But these are my sahaba!" It will be said to me, "You do not know what they brought forth after you." I will say, "Then perdition should be the lot of all those who altered after me."
                        Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Vol. 7, p. 209, in a chapter dealing with the Pool [of al-Kawthar]... evidently not all the sahaba were saints now were they!
                        Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
                          ^ Bukhari is not regarded as Sahih by some.... for those who DO regard it as such... it is used 2 proove them wrong since this is the source that they themselves accept... thats the rules of debate/...... evidently u are in ignorence of that
                          You are not answering my question.

                          Please explain. If there is any truth in Bukhari, should I accept everything in Bukhari? Or only that which you present to me?
                          [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
                          [/URL]
                          [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
                          [/URL][/SIZE]
                          Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

                          Comment


                          • Ur BOOKS are used as U accept them 2 be true... it does not mean the poster himself accepts them 2 be true.... they are used to SHOW u that ur views are wrong by ur own sources!
                            Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by شمله ور خراساني View Post
                              You are not answering my question.

                              Please explain. If there is any truth in Bukhari, should I accept everything in Bukhari? Or only that which you present to me?
                              U are the 1 who claims 2 accept 100% BUKHARI so now BUKHARI tells u what I have told u.... refute it and u are saying Bukari lies!..... U are self impaling urself!
                              Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                              Comment


                              • refute the sources please..... dont beat about the bush
                                Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X