What Islam has given to the world?

[Karachi]

Source please.

do you think most scientists are taliban mullahs like you? They may believe in God or not, but they are defiantly not practicing religious people. Most people know this. This is why there are so many science vs religion debates out there

[DaZahroJaam.]

Well there's two kinds of unbelievers

1) the haven't been through anything in life, so there is no God. Ex: Dawkins

2) the why did this happen. If there was a God, why would he let it happen. Ex: Stephen Hawkings

And oh yea

3) the Ibliss, I am above listening and obeying something else. Ex: 95% of humans

source please.

[کیش]

source please.

I don't give references. I am the source.

[khushal]

Stop fighting!

http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

That proves the opposite of what you claimed.
That says that 51% believe in a deity which makes most are not agnostic or atheist but theist.

You fell in the same trap as Karachi, you assume things. Please research before you make claims.

[khushal]

do you think most scientists are taliban mullahs like you? They may believe in God or not, but they are defiantly not practicing religious people. Most people know this. This is why there are so many science vs religion debates out there

I never claimed anything, your just mad because I proved most of what you say is just incompetent blabbering.

Relax and learn from the experience. You should thank me.

On a side note: Can you tell me the difference between Science and Religion?

[khushal]

Well there's two kinds of unbelievers

1) the haven't been through anything in life, so there is no God. Ex: Dawkins

2) the why did this happen. If there was a God, why would he let it happen. Ex: Stephen Hawkings

And oh yea

3) the Ibliss, I am above listening and obeying something else. Ex: 95% of humans

The problem with Hawkings and Dawkins is that they are egotistical because of their fame and the attention they receive. They get too involved in thyself that they lose focus on what they specialize in.

They are both dumber than the young teenage Socrates who said it best "I know that I know nothing."

[Karachi]

I never claimed anything, your just mad because I proved most of what you say is just incompetent blabbering.

Relax and learn from the experience. You should thank me.

On a side note: Can you tell me the difference between Science and Religion?

again, speaking out of your ass like a typical mullah, where did you prove "most" of what I say is wrong??

[khushal]

again, speaking out of your ass like a typical mullah, where did you prove "most" of what I say is wrong??

Just go back in most of your statements. the vast majority of what you spit out which is shyt is just incompetent blabbering with no source. When there is no source, its called speaking out of your arse which is shyt.

[کیش]

I wasn't aware that a typical mullah (which means the same as neighborhood masjid leading imam) speaks "out of their ass".

[Khostai]

I wasn't aware that a typical mullah (which means the same as neighborhood masjid leading imam) speaks "out of their ass".

Maybe you should visit Afghanistan, and see what most mullah say is total garbage. Most of you western raised kids don't know what kind of evil subhuman peice of **** most mullahs are. The mullah that acussed Farkhunda of burning Quran is not even the worst kind, their are much worser ones.

[کیش]

Maybe you should visit Afghanistan, and see what most mullah say is total garbage. Most of you western raised kids don't know what kind of evil subhuman peice of **** most mullahs are. The mullah that acussed Farkhunda of burning Quran is not even the worst kind, their are much worser ones.

who are you calling a kid, my son. why you getting all excited for? maybe your English is horrible so no problem i will help you out.

When someone says an adjective(These are words that describe a noun. and those are a person, place or thing) like typical, it's synonyms are other adjectives includes average. And the meaning of average is common. And common also means ubiquitous and that means everywhere.

I highly doubt the "typical mullah speaks out of their ass." since they are probably north of millions of Mullahs in the world.

[Khostai]

who are you calling a kid, my son. why you getting all excited for? maybe your English is horrible so no problem i will help you out.

When someone says an adjective(These are words that describe a noun. and those are a person, place or thing) like typical, it's synonyms are other adjectives includes average. And the meaning of average is common. And common also means ubiquitous and that means everywhere.

I highly doubt the "typical mullah speaks out of their ass." since they are probably north of millions of Mullahs in the world.

I am sorry if I offended your pedohile mullah in pakistan who molests kids. It was not mine intention.

[DaZahroJaam.]

That proves the opposite of what you claimed.
That says that 51% believe in a deity which makes most are not agnostic or atheist but theist.

You fell in the same trap as Karachi, you assume things. Please research before you make claims.

First of all, no they don't. Agnostics believe in something beyond "God", not the absence of one so A) belief in "a diety or higher power.." Still applies to them and B) you bringing in theists in to this matter was pointless but yay to you for managing to drag the conversation in to an irrelevant corner AGAIN.
Secondly, whether the pole suggests that the majority of people are theists or not, should not mean anything because that belief of theirs does not match yours. Whether the majority or not, their belief by default means nothing to you so what are you trying to prove?? Lema, you are wrong about the amount of people you think are not in agreement with me.. look at how many other people are wrong and not in agreement with my point..
Yay, you. What I said was not my complete point and I am greatful to you for completing it for me but let's get back to you being wrong as you were right in the beginning.
Welcome to square one. One God or three gods, theists or not, it doesn't mean that these people's beliefs are parallel with yours. How do you plan on fixing this problem??

[کیش]

First of all, no they don't. Agnostics believe in something beyond "God", not the absence of one so A) belief in "a diety or higher power.." Still applies to them and B) you bringing in theists in to this matter was pointless but yay to you for managing to drag the conversation in to an irrelevant corner AGAIN.
Secondly, whether the pole suggests that the majority of people are theists or not, should not mean anything because that belief of theirs does not match yours. Whether the majority or not, their belief by default means nothing to you so what are you trying to prove?? Lema, you are wrong about the amount of people you think are not in agreement with me.. look at how many other people are wrong and not in agreement with my point..
Yay, you. What I said was not my complete point and I am greatful to you for completing it for me but let's get back to you being wrong as you were right in the beginning.
Welcome to square one. One God or three gods, theists or not, it doesn't mean that these people's beliefs are parallel with yours. How do you plan on fixing this problem??

I'm going to have to be a Daeshbag on your definition of "Agnostic". where did you get it from.

This is what Agnostic means. it comes from Greek meaning unknown or unknowable.

Agnostics assert that it’s impossible for human beings to know anything about how the universe was created and if divine beings exist.

That is going against the Master of the Universe, as he explained the process of how the universe was created in the Qu'ran

Here is your academia approved reference for that definition. i even put it in MLA format for you

Ecklund, Elaine Howard, and Kristen Schultz Lee. "Atheists And Agnostics Negotiate Religion And Family." Journal For The Scientific Study Of Religion 50.4 (2011): 728-743. SocINDEX with Full Text. Web. 7 May 2015.

[khushal]

First of all, no they don't. Agnostics believe in something beyond "God", not the absence of one so A) belief in "a diety or higher power.." Still applies to them and B) you bringing in theists in to this matter was pointless but yay to you for managing to drag the conversation in to an irrelevant corner AGAIN.
Secondly, whether the pole suggests that the majority of people are theists or not, should not mean anything because that belief of theirs does not match yours. Whether the majority or not, their belief by default means nothing to you so what are you trying to prove?? Lema, you are wrong about the amount of people you think are not in agreement with me.. look at how many other people are wrong and not in agreement with my point..
Yay, you. What I said was not my complete point and I am greatful to you for completing it for me but let's get back to you being wrong as you were right in the beginning.
Welcome to square one. One God or three gods, theists or not, it doesn't mean that these people's beliefs are parallel with yours. How do you plan on fixing this problem??

You are all over the place with your assumptions..

First it has nothing to do with my beliefs or your beliefs. That is a strawman. It has to do with what you claimed which you did not research and just assumed. You claimed that most scientists are agnostic(Kaish already defined this) and then you put up an article that says 51% are theists which disproves you claim.

You seem to not know what an agnostic means. First you should learn what the words mean and then research and then you could make a claim that you could back up with a valid source. Dont just assume and then when your proven wrong, you redefine words and then ask people what are you trying to prove. Thanks.