Originally posted by Manzareh
View Post
So since there is no mixing in numbers large enough to require the adoption of common languages, dialects, etc., your left with the neither here nor there scenario in Afghanistan but in Afghanistan Pashtoons make up a large chunk of the population and have historically held power so they are in a better position to not have the language drowned out as opposed to Pakistan but its still not ideal.
Another issue involving making Pashto a primary influence is that it has not had as rich a history and therefore foothold on classical literary works (probably the biggest vehicle to promotion of a language), Afghanistan is destitute and moneys are much better spent on other things, and finally and maybe most importantly is that Afghanistan's inhabitants generally aren't a lettered people, Pashtoon and non-Pashtoon alike, so how will you go to the rural Tajik or Uzbek areas who learn to speak only through parents and have no formal education and therefore no exposure to Pashtoons or Pashtoon language? In all of our major cities most everyone knows Pashto but if you want a mass acceptance of Pashto it won't happen until there is a more developed country.
To be honest, despite what people claim on this board, the Farsi speaking people of Afghanistan absolutely hate to be associated in any way with any other Iranian people and really had no issues with Pashtoons until the Civil War which started mass ethnic conflict. I think 30 years ago you could of had a better shot of establishing Pashto even more amongst non-Pashtoons in Afghanistan but with all the killing and violence and blaming of that on ethnic tensions, it would be a harder sell today.



Comment