Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jinnah, an armchair politician

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Elite Pakhtun View Post
    I disagree. Between the Chota Ghalughara, and the Barra Ghalughara, there is a gap of 16 years.

    Unfortunately there's not enough literature available online to see the details of this, but I think the Mughals were a lot more ruthless on the Sikhs than Ahmad Shah. Mughals used to torture the hell out of Sikhs, when they refused to convert... cutting them "joint by joint" and putting them on "torture wheels" etc. ASD was a bit more straight forward... get rid of them.

    From the pieces I've gathered, it looks like after the first holocaust, the momentum died down.



    Right... but why did they join Sikhs? If it was gold/cash, then how did the Sikhs get gold/cash?
    Holocaust is a very strong word, Abdali merely slaughtered their army (estimated between 12,000 and 30,000) in 1762. Sikhs always exaggerate, fabricate and blow things out of proportion .....

    As they were not a race but a religion so they were continuously gaining new followers , converts from less privileged classes of Hinduism...and you are right, Mughals dealt with them more ruthlessly and successfully......they knew where and how to catch and kill Sikh rats........in that so called 1762's holocaust , Abdali was able to catch up to Sikhs due to local help from Nawab of Malerkotla, an Indo-Afghan who were previously part of the Mughal administration.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Kakar-Wardak View Post
      also their history is full of lies like a handful of Sikhs defeated lakhs of mughals or fighting without a head I mean seriously?
      lol this made me laugh. I think the story of Baba Deep Singh is a semi-religious, semi-military one. It's a story made for morale, I think any militia at the time would make stories up to inspire their fighters. But yeah, of course he didn't continue fighting with his head in his hand, that's lol very stupid.

      Originally posted by Samandri View Post
      Holocaust is a very strong word, Abdali merely slaughtered their army (estimated between 12,000 and 30,000) in 1762. Sikhs always exaggerate, fabricate and blow things out of proportion ..

      As they were not a race but a religion so they were continuously gaining new followers , converts from less privileged classes of Hinduism...and you are right, Mughals dealt with them more ruthlessly and successfully......they knew where and how to catch and kill Sikh rats........in that so called 1762's holocaust , Abdali was able to catch up to Sikhs due to local help from Nawab of Malerkotla, an Indo-Afghan who were previously part of the Mughal administration.
      Sikhs aren't in the wrong on this. Mughals were ruthless, and barbaric in their pursuit to torture Sikhs, when really they hadn't even taken up arms back then. Abdalis, well... they were just a pile of turd and a stain on Punjab's history.

      Comment


      • #78
        Sikhs might have been killed initially, but they kicked your pathan butt later to drive you out from India and the Punjab, this is why even non sikh punjabis including muslim punjabi have respect for Sikh fighters. Pashtuns had no business in south asia to begin with, you did nothing for south asia except bring misery to the local people, including local muslims. they drove you back to your cold arid lands and that is where you have been stuck ever since, Keep living in your past dreams

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Porus View Post
          Abdalis, well... they were just a pile of turd and a stain on Punjab's history.
          HAHAHAHAHAHAHA... Punjab's illustrious history of nothing.
          [MENTION=17351]Friends of Baloch[/MENTION]

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Karachi View Post
            Sikhs might have been killed initially, but they kicked your pathan butt later to drive you out from India and the Punjab, this is why even non sikh punjabis including muslim punjabi have respect for Sikh fighters. Pashtuns had no business in south asia to begin with, you did nothing for south asia except bring misery to the local people, including local muslims. they drove you back to your cold arid lands and that is where you have been stuck ever since, Keep living in your past dreams
            Is that why there are millions of pashtuns descendants all over Indian land.

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Kakar-Wardak View Post
              Is that why there are millions of pashtuns descendants all over Indian land.

              who said that? there is hardly any indian who looks like pashtun

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Elite Pakhtun View Post
                HAHAHAHAHAHAHA... Punjab's illustrious history of nothing.
                [MENTION=17351]Friends of Baloch[/MENTION]
                Calm down mate, that's not a insult to Pashtuns, it's a direct attack at Ahmad Shah.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                  who said that? there is hardly any indian who looks like pashtun
                  Pashtuns have been Invading/migrating since the time of Ghaznavi, 3 panipat battles most of the soldiers were pashtuns, so you can only imagine they must have left behind large numbers of descendants.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                    who said that? there is hardly any indian who looks like pashtun
                    I remember you said that your family members had green eyes because of Swati pathan ancestry.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by dawn View Post
                      I remember you said that your family members had green eyes because of Swati pathan ancestry.
                      having green eyes doesn't mean pashtuns, even kashmiries have coloured eyes, they are much older then pashtuns. ALso it is known that I was pretending to be a Pathan at the beginning, cause everybody here hated Muhajirs, I dont give a rat's ass about that any more

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                        having green eyes doesn't mean pashtuns, even kashmiries have coloured eyes, they are much older then pashtuns. ALso it is known that I was pretending to be a Pathan at the beginning, cause everybody here hated Muhajirs, I dont give a rat's ass about that any more
                        You also claimed Pathan roots on Afghan-forums and no body was hating you there

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Samandri View Post
                          You also claimed Pathan roots on Afghan-forums and no body was hating you there

                          No I did not, and they hated muhajirs there too, since you were there anyways. I kicked your butt there and i am kicking your butt here, a non indic guy should not have any business with Indics, you have never been to Karachi and you act as if you are the master of Karachi, go back to central asia

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                            No I did not, and they hated muhajirs there too, since you were there anyways. I kicked your butt there and i am kicking your butt here, a non indic guy should not have any business with Indics, you have never been to Karachi and you act as if you are the master of Karachi, go back to central asia

                            What are you doing in Canada than go back to bihar.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                              No I did not, and they hated muhajirs there too, since you were there anyways. I kicked your butt there and i am kicking your butt here, a non indic guy should not have any business with Indics, you have never been to Karachi and you act as if you are the master of Karachi, go back to central asia
                              You are Pathetic. The Tajiks/Farsiwans there did not know what exactly is mohajir/urduspeaker and they were quite nice to you......you were claiming there that your forefathers are Pathans. Of course you have no relation with Pathans but you also lied there.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Samandri View Post
                                You are Pathetic. The Tajiks/Farsiwans there did not know what exactly is mohajir/urduspeaker and they were quite nice to you......you were claiming there that your forefathers are Pathans. Of course you have no relation with Pathans but you also lied there.

                                Tajik/Farsiwans were my friends there, but the few pashtuns there including you were extremely racist against indics and mohajirs, and no I did not claim to be a pathan there, I am pretty sure of that

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X