^ Let me ask you few questions.
1. Do you think about transription or transliteration?
2. If you mean transliteration, which version of "زما " would you choose for transliteration, zma, zema, zama? In fact I could give more examples here...
3. How would you treat monophtongization typical for Eastern dialects? Would you take in it into account in transliteration only or in transliteration and transcription?
4. Did you take into account that last migrations in Afghanistan have made that dialects are mixed and some poeple may not realize if they are speakers of X or Y Or Z dialect?
5. You think of "restandardization"... First, Pashto has never had a one standard form. So nothing to "re-". Beside, would you choose arbitrarily one dialect and establish it as a norm of Pashto? Have you thought about social consequences of it?
1. Do you think about transription or transliteration?
2. If you mean transliteration, which version of "زما " would you choose for transliteration, zma, zema, zama? In fact I could give more examples here...
3. How would you treat monophtongization typical for Eastern dialects? Would you take in it into account in transliteration only or in transliteration and transcription?
4. Did you take into account that last migrations in Afghanistan have made that dialects are mixed and some poeple may not realize if they are speakers of X or Y Or Z dialect?
5. You think of "restandardization"... First, Pashto has never had a one standard form. So nothing to "re-". Beside, would you choose arbitrarily one dialect and establish it as a norm of Pashto? Have you thought about social consequences of it?


Comment