Shia Islam for Dummies: Ask Those who Know

[Dreamer]

U argue against shia for daring 2 speak against ur sahaba but even the Prophet according to Bukhari was told that not all of them were destined for heaven

"My sahaba will be taken to the fire [of hell], whereupon I shall plead: "O Lord! But these are my sahaba!" It will be said to me, "You do not know what they brought forth after you." I will say, "Then perdition should be the lot of all those who altered after me."
Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Vol. 7, p. 209, in a chapter dealing with the Pool [of al-Kawthar

[Dreamer]

i am not think. And i am not running away. I want you to convince me. I am asking you something.

But you keep throwing your cheap comments at me saying i cannot debate because i won't play ball according to your rules.

You want me to accept bukhari as the truth whenever it suites your agenda, and disbelieve in it whenever it contradicts your shi'ite domga.

Are you being honest with me?

thats how u debate... U use sources which the other party accepts!

[شمله ور خراساني]

U argue against shia for daring 2 speak against ur sahaba but even the Prophet according to Bukhari was told that not all of them were destined for heaven

"My sahaba will be taken to the fire [of hell], whereupon I shall plead: "O Lord! But these are my sahaba!" It will be said to me, "You do not know what they brought forth after you." I will say, "Then perdition should be the lot of all those who altered after me."
Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Vol. 7, p. 209, in a chapter dealing with the Pool [of al-Kawthar

Okay. Let us accept this narration of Bukhari as the truth. Is eveyrthing else in Bukhari likewise, the truth? Should we believe everything else htat is in Bukhari?


Or just this narrations which suites you?

[Dreamer]

Why would I use nahj al baglagha (which btw is not claimed 2 be sahih either) or al kafee again not claimed 2 be sahih by shia .... all u wld do would say is this is a shia book... Im using a source which u accept 2 prove u wrong.... namely BUKHARI....

[Abu Hurayrah]

Dreamer, don't ignore me here, just copy paste the hadith you have problems with, you keep screaming about Sahih bukhari this and that, but till now, all the narrations you posted are explained, I really don't see your problem, maybe you should call some buddies to help you here, but you really make a fool of yourself. After all, it shouldn't be about winning a debate, and it isn't for us, but be fair here, and don't post as many posts as you can, it is clearly no competition who can add the most reply's, all your posts are empty, and full of

naseebi, you son of muawiyah, you yazeed lover, you naseebe 867^&%^&,

Just look at yourself and think for a minute, I am serious here.

[Dreamer]

Okay. Let us accept this narration of Bukhari as the truth. Is eveyrthing else in Bukhari likewise, the truth? Should we believe everything else htat is in Bukhari?


Or just this narrations which suites you?

The fact is that U ACCEPT IT 2 BE TRUE! I do not regard Bukhari 2 be sahih... it doesnt matter what I think... all that matters is what U and others who think that its SAHIH do....

[شمله ور خراساني]

thats how u debate... U use sources which the other party accepts!

should I accept everything in bukhari? Or only just this what you present to me?

[Dreamer]

Dreamer, don't ignore me here, just copy paste the hadith you have problems with, you keep screaming about Sahih bukhari this and that, but till now, all the narrations you posted are explained, I really don't see your problem, maybe you should call some buddies to help you here, but you really make a fool of yourself. After all, it shouldn't be about winning a debate, and it isn't for us, but be fair here, and don't post as many posts as you can, it is clearly no competition who can add the most reply's, all your posts are empty, and full of

naseebi, you son of muawiyah, you yazeed lover, you naseebe 867^&%^&,

Just look at yourself and think for a minute, I am serious here.

My relies use ur sources 2 prove u wrong the rest are with arguing with ppl who run away from their won narrations... 2 try and get them 2 stick 2 the argument...

[شمله ور خراساني]

The fact is that U ACCEPT IT 2 BE TRUE! I do not regard Bukhari 2 be sahih... it doesnt matter what I think... all that matters is what U and others who think that its SAHIH do....

it does matter what YOU think because YOU use Bukhari as a source to teach us about, read the title of the thread: " Shia Islam for Dummies: Ask those who Know"


LOL

[Dreamer]

Learn how 2 debate sangar.... when u do we will talk.... Ive ried breaking it down why I use Bukhari but clearly u lack the capacity 2 retain this information

[Dreamer]

it does matter what YOU think because YOU use Bukhari as a source to teach us about, read the title of the thread: " Shia Islam for Dummies: Ask those who Know"


LOL

I am using it here not for shiaisim... but 2 argue with those like U who regard it as 100% true

[شمله ور خراساني]

Learn how 2 debate sangar.... when u do we will talk.... Ive ried breaking it down why I use Bukhari but clearly u lack the capacity 2 retain this information

no. dont go away.let's discuss this. Is Bukhari entirely sahih? Or only those narrations YOU like to use?

[Dreamer]

at abu hurayra I posted a hadith from Bukhari a book u claim 2 be 100% true.... Now u sunnis say u love all the sahaba,,, and that none of them did wrong.... BUKHARI is now telling u that not all of them were as u say....
Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Vol. 7, p. 209

[Dreamer]

no. Dont go away.let's discuss this. Is bukhari entirely sahih? Or only those narrations you like to use?

no its not sahih... U say its sahih so these narrations according 2 u shld be true... So explain them!

[شمله ور خراساني]

I am using it here not for shiaisim... but 2 argue with those like U who regard it as 100% true

this thread is not about the authenticity of Sahih Bukhari. But about teaching us "dummies" what Shi'ite religion is about.

So when you use a book as a source to teach us "dummies" about your religion, you need to affirm that your source is reliable. If you can't guarantee that from where you are quoting is authentic, then why should we believe you?