Originally posted by Alchemist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Evolutiontheory is just a theory and not an Evidence
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ozymandias View PostAgain, I have not really posted enough of my opinion on evolution for you to make that claim.
Well, it appears the only basis you have for your faith is straw men, so I guess it would have to be weak. Feel free to post actual arguments and drop the fallacies and prove me wrong, though.
Already posted, though I do not foresee any argument -- just more straw men from you.
stop acting like you are all mysterious and enigmatic...
you and the ****mitar feel some kind of mystical connection because you both grew up reading horror stories under your blankets as children ...having similar experiences, similar environments ...naturally similar attitudes towards popular myths like evolution.
You are so confident that evolution happened the way it is described in cartoons and movies that you find the idea of debating it's tenants ridiculous. The same kind of zeal that a theist would have if you question him the existence of a Creator.
"Atheist agnostic mystical cosmic inter galactic new age hippy"... did i get it right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alchemist View PostHow am I losing this debate?
.................................................. .................................................. ................The English came to your native country, subjugated your people, and literally white washed you out of your heritage, and I am the one losing the debate, in grace?
and I quote
Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
I am a capitalist.
debate lost by Alchemist
Comment
-
I'll make a deal with you. You make a single good case in this thread, I will read every post, and link in the linked threads.Originally posted by Alchemist View PostDo me a favour buddy.
Go click on those threads I posted a few posts before and just scan through them. You will find all the answers to your questions there. I already dealt with them there in details. Or you want me to copy and paste it for you back again here?
If you are sincere, then you will do that. But if you are another childish egomaniac like ****mitar...you will persist in believing in your delusions.
for example - even the drug resistance, isn't proof of evolution, because in the absence of the artificial stressor, the wild strain will flourish once again.
You are off to a terrible start, though. In the case of drug-resistant bacteria, you claim that it is proof against evolution that when the environment changes, the most successful strain of a disease, the strain evolved to best survive in those conditions, flourishes.
So basically, you are arguing that just because the strains do *exactly what evolution states should happen*, evolution is wrong?
The existence of drug-resistant strains is due to the environment changing, so they evolve to be better suited to the new environment. When the environment changes *BACK* they are not guaranteed to still be best suited for the environment, so the unmutated strains now, once again, have an advantage over the mutated.
This doesn't even address the fact that even if the wild strain flourishes, the mutated ones still survive and spread -- they are just sub-optimal outside their niche.
Nothing in evolution garantees that all mutations are optimal for all environments, only that the surviving mutations are *more optimal* than the original strains *for the new environment*.
This is something that is taught in introductory biology -- in Jr. High.-------------------------------------------------
"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by ozymandias View PostI'll make a deal with you. You make a single good case in this thread, I will read every post, and link in the linked threads.
You are off to a terrible start, though. In the case of drug-resistant bacteria, you claim that it is proof against evolution that when the environment changes, the most successful strain of a disease, the strain evolved to best survive in those conditions, flourishes.
So basically, you are arguing that just because the strains do *exactly what evolution states should happen*, evolution is wrong?
The existence of drug-resistant strains is due to the environment changing, so they evolve to be better suited to the new environment. When the environment changes *BACK* they are not guaranteed to still be best suited for the environment, so the unmutated strains now, once again, have an advantage over the mutated.
This doesn't even address the fact that even if the wild strain flourishes, the mutated ones still survive and spread -- they are just sub-optimal outside their niche.
Nothing in evolution garantees that all mutations are optimal for all environments, only that the surviving mutations are *more optimal* than the original strains *for the new environment*.
This is something that is taught in introductory biology -- in Jr. High.
Evolution and Antibiotic Resistance - YouTube
Comment
-
Look, it is not all that negative...I have used the qualifier "the greatest"...so imposter but still the greatest...I could've used the word evilest, etc...but I didn't ...so why this "bad manal"...I can't understand it really...Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostAlchemist gives you a hard time? You poor thing. lol
Comment
-
Again with the personal attacks! You love those fallacies, don't you?Originally posted by Alchemist View Poststop acting like you are all mysterious and enigmatic...
you and the ****mitar feel some kind of mystical connection because you both grew up reading horror stories under your blankets as children ...having similar experiences, similar environments
One could also point out that since we are educated, we have the same view of science.
...naturally similar attitudes towards popular myths like evolution.
I'm perfectly willing to debate them. Let me know when you feel like debating them, and drop all the fallacies and actually hold a debate.
You are so confident that evolution happened the way it is described in cartoons and movies that you find the idea of debating it's tenants ridiculous.
I'm not sure. You posted gibberish -- was that what you were trying to do? If so, congrats -- it's the best I have seen!
The same kind of zeal that a theist would have if you question him the existence of a Creator.
"Atheist agnostic mystical cosmic inter galactic new age hippy"... did i get it right?-------------------------------------------------
"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by ozymandias View PostAgain with the personal attacks! You love those fallacies, don't you?
One could also point out that since we are educated, we have the same view of science.
I'm perfectly willing to debate them. Let me know when you feel like debating them, and drop all the fallacies and actually hold a debate.
I'm not sure. You posted gibberish -- was that what you were trying to do? If so, congrats -- it's the best I have seen!
Your education is outdated ...did you watch the video old man?
Comment
-
The problem isn't the Taliban fighting NATO, the priblem is the Taliban murdering their own people under the pretext of fighting NATO.Originally posted by Alchemist View PostDid the Taliban instigate the war? Did they go to America that ****mitar is now asking "what is talibans excuse"? Why is brother killing his own brother? Does that make sense to you?
.You paint them as barbaric savages who willfully kill and maim their own kin and blood out of lust.
More like deliberate neglect..and the reason they're willing to do that is because they have been brainwashed to believe that the sacrifice of Muslim lives is worth it because somehow it will bring them instant paradise and they won't feel the anguish of such a violent death.
People would never suicide bomb without such indoctrination first
Nor can you; you think pain comes from NATO only, don't you think the man who lost his wife and kids feels pain when the Taliban blew them to bits just to get a Humvee? Or do you think "ah that's ok ... trying to get that Humvee, which had no NATO casualties was worth it"?.but the truth is that you have been so taken out of the heart of Afghanistan that you cannot understand them, or feel their pain.
have you ever asked yourself that?
Afghans were able to defeat the Soviets with those same rusty guns; without a single massacre of civlians, without a singe suicide bomb, there is no excuse.You and ****mitar can't relate to those people who live in the mountains, fighting the worlds most advanced military army in the history with nothing but rusty guns and ammunitions....
Yeah...I wish I could lose with such grace as you have.[/QUOTE]
Comment
-
Congratulations! You provided a video that exactly states what I already pointed out.Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
Glad to see you can find videos to back up my point -- and prove you have no understanding of evolution at all.-------------------------------------------------
"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Comment
-
Capitalism is an infidel ideology and economic system;Originally posted by Alchemist View PostCapitalist - one who owns the means of production.
I told you I opened a steel fabrication company.
You dumbass.
In Canada no less, the heart of the very infidel society who's gears oppress and occupy Afghanistan.
and you say Toramana is whitewashed? which he is , but so are you. The reason you know Toramana so well is because you're exactly like him
Comment
-
oooh gosh, hahaha you have to read the evolution debates they're hilarious; everything he sites that he claims debunks evolution, actually confirmed evolution.Originally posted by ozymandias View PostCongratulations! You provided a video that exactly states what I already pointed out.
Glad to see you can find videos to back up my point -- and prove you have no understanding of evolution at all.
I actually asked him to take his rebuttals against evolution publicly and challenge known researchers in evolutionary biology
guess what his response was?
Comment
-
Indeed I did, and I already explained exactly how your logic was flawed based on that video. Just because a strain evolved to be better suited in a modified environment does *not* mean it is better suited in the unmodified one.Originally posted by Alchemist View PostYour education is outdated ...did you watch the video old man?
That's just common sense. You clearly have no understanding of evolution if you think that the modified strain is guaranteed to be better suited than the original in all cases.-------------------------------------------------
"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Comment

Comment