Why Evolutiontheory is just a theory and not an Evidence

[Alchemist]

Tryng to reinvent the meaning of "new species" is not a "debunking" it's a way of tring to make your incompetence seem like victories


you're hallucinating and deluding yourself. The articles were clear, otherwise PROVE, not speculate that "New Species" doesn't actually mean "New Species".

LOL

So now your going to pretend you didn't see the thread where I debunked you.

(Way to go tor khan)


Look ****mitar... You are an idiot. Don't you think that the researcher would be more thrilled to discover ELEVEN new species over finding one gene? Yet the gene makes the headline...and he doesn't even talk about "new species" in ANY article!

No new species of bacteria were found. The person who wrote that article was a layman like you. He was wrong to say "new species". You quoted a journalist. That journalist did not quote the scientist directly.


Here is the original paper by Welsh.

From Sept 26 to Oct 10, 2010, 171 seepage samples and 50 tap water samples from New Delhi and 70 sewage effluent samples from Cardiff Wastewater Treatment Works were collected. We detected bla(NDM-1) in two of 50 drinking-water samples and 51 of 171 seepage samples from New Delhi; the gene was not found in any sample from Cardiff. Bacteria with bla(NDM-1) were grown from 12 of 171 seepage samples and two of 50 water samples, and included 11 species in which NDM-1 has not previously been reported, including Shigella boydii and Vibrio cholerae. Carriage by enterobacteria, aeromonads, and V cholera was stable, generally transmissible, and associated with resistance patterns typical for NDM-1; carriage by non-fermenters was unstable in many cases and not associated with typical resistance. 20 strains of bacteria were found in the samples, 12 of which carried bla(NDM-1) on plasmids, which ranged in size from 140 to 400 kb. Isolates of Aeromonas caviae and V cholerae carried bla(NDM-1) on chromosomes. Conjugative transfer was more common at 30°C than at 25°C or 37°C.

Dissemination of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence study : The Lancet Infectious Diseases

strain=/species.

Get it through your thick bald skull, you ape: Originally NDM1 was found in E.coli in 2009...now they found it in cholerae, A. Caviae and Shigella. That is what is "new". Those are existing species of bacteria.

You are the one who is sticking his sticking his fingers in his eyes and ears! You are reading the paper selectively. That journalistic piece is based on a peer reviewed journal ...and the ORIGINAL source does NOT state " New species discovered".

Honestly..just go pork your self. You are a fool. First you suppose that anti biotics has given rise to "new species"...and then you cite a paper that has nothing to do with anti biotics and doesn't even show "new species" but only supposes it, conjecturally. Then you cite a journalists mistake as "proof".

Just get over the fact that you don't know what it is you are talking about. You can't debate with me on evolution. You are just too ignorant to do so. You keep shooting your self in the foot and then get mad.