Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Evolutiontheory is just a theory and not an Evidence

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
    now let me correct where you're wrong and right

    this is wrong, it has methanes yes, but it doesn't CONSIST of pentane, the reason it is called methylpentane is because, it has five C's bonded, but it is not made of pentane, because pentane is C5H12, but this is compound would have 5 Carbons 9 Hydrogens + Three Methanes
    pardon me you are totally wrong , you have not even the basic knowledge of chemistry,which you can achieve in school.

    let me correct you...

    there are many ways to form this molecule , one it happens by isomerisation (which you never heard in your life i guess) while they are no alkene,but alkane

    second it happens by while there are alkenes
    Polymerization

    http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...ion#ref1004352



    wrong Methane is an ALKANE, Alkene Monomer is Ethylene which is C2H4
    are you retard did i said its a isotope, i was not reffering to the methane...you idiot you even can get it from the name that it is alkane.




    This means you're not chemistry student; this is one of the first problems you learn in Organic Chemistry, after you learn functional groups
    this means you talk much bulllsh*t when the day is long. (its a german quote)
    High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

    Comment


    • #17
      As i see you are an
      "Applied Mathematician"
      explain me the imaginary numbers how euler understood it...
      High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

      Comment


      • #18
        Where is your answer its been 8 hours.
        High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
          pardon me you are totally wrong , you have not even the basic knowledge of chemistry,which you can achieve in school.
          there are many ways to form this molecule , one it happens by isomerisation (which you never heard in your life i guess) while they are no alkene,but alkane
          But I asked you specifically how to polymerize an ALKENE monomer to form 2,2,4 trimethylpentane. Also this has nothing to do with isomerisation; isomerisation is just changing the structural arrangement of a molecule; I'm talking about POLYMERIZATION of an Alkene Monomer.

          so you're going into tangents now. You can form alkenes into alkanes by hydrogenation with acid-water solution to produce a hydrogen transfer reaction.

          second it happens by while there are alkenes
          Polymerization
          This is your entire post quoted

          2,2,4 consists of methane,penthane ....it has three methan CH4 , to the second two methane bonds, it is from alkene they react with eachother to form a bigger molecules which are also molecules ...

          it is also isomere of octan as part of the ALKANE

          C-C(here are the two methane)-C-C(the last methane is here)-C

          its 2,2,4 trimethylpentane

          it is also called isoOctan(8)

          this all is in the subject of organic chemistry.
          Last edited by Afghanistan2010; Yesterday at 07:44 AM
          It makes no sense, they're not from alkenes to react with each other, there is no de-alkanization of methane, Methane isn't an alkene, and allkenes become alkanes by adding hydrogens in acid-water solutions.









          [are you retard did i said its a isotope, i was not reffering to the methane...you idiot you even can get it from the name that it is alkane.
          You idiot, and Isotope is an ELEMENT/ATOM with a different ATOMIC mass, we're dealing with molecules not their elements themselves. are you trying to say ISOMER? And Isomer is a compound with the same molecular formula but different structure.

          SubhanAllah, you're panicking now I can tell.

          you're so uneducated.
          Last edited by ScimitarXEdge; 10-10-2011, 12:19 PM.

          Comment


          • #20
            Evolution is science and fact.

            No religion has described fossils, past inhabitants of this land with factual evidence.

            I dont know much of science based topics hence my withdrawal from this thread.

            But in my view, science has more fact than religion.

            I.e Christians assumed the black plague was due to its inhabitants not praying enough, Tablighi Jammat assumed the recent floods in Pakistan was due to Poor Muslims not praying enough, All answers were revealed through science and logic.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
              it makes no sense, they're not from alkenes to react with each other, there is no de-alkanization of methane, Methane isn't an alkene, and allkenes become alkanes by adding hydrogens in acid-water solutions.

              are you retard,the alkene reaction has nothing to do with methane...
              polymerization happens when two alkenes are used as entry products.







              ..., and Isotope is an ELEMENT/ATOM with a different ATOMIC mass, we're dealing with molecules not their elements themselves. are you trying to say ISOMER? And Isomer is a compound with the same molecular formula but different structure.

              SubhanAllah, you're panicking now I can tell.

              you're so uneducated.
              I think you didnt get it ...it was part of sarcasm that i used oh dewana..

              Isotops : have the same protons but different numbers of neutrons....thats why they differ in their atomic mass.
              High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
                As i see you are an
                explain me the imaginary numbers how euler understood it...

                eh are you trying to talk about Euler's formula? what do you mean by Understood it? He understood the Imaginary Numbers the same as everyone else understands them. He just derived a formula which demonstrates a special relationship.

                Euler's Formula simply states that Imaginary numbers have an identity which can be described using the corresponding Natural Number e raised to an imaginary is identical trigonometric computation of an imaginary number and follows a circular path

                is that you're referring to? This is something used in Electromagnetism to describe the the wave movement of electrical signals.

                You're an idiot.....even your question was dumb and nonsensical.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Explain me his formula you mathematician...
                  High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Soldat_Amir View Post
                    I.e Christians assumed the black plague was due to its inhabitants not praying enough, Tablighi Jammat assumed the recent floods in Pakistan was due to Poor Muslims not praying enough, All answers were revealed through science and logic.

                    Since when Tablighi Jammat are the official muslim's spokepersons ?


                    Originally posted by Soldat_Amir View Post
                    Evolution is science and fact.

                    Evolution, yes, but not the theory of evolution. You don't know much about science, do you ?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
                      are you retard,the alkene reaction has nothing to do with methane...
                      polymerization happens when two alkenes are used as entry products.
                      But I was asking you how do you Polymerize from an ALKENE ..did you forget my original question?

                      You were simply wrong; you don't know chemistry, you're just web searching. But you can't understand science by web searching.









                      I think you didnt get it ...it was part of sarcasm that i used oh dewana..:running
                      Science is not a thing for sarcasm; this is just an excuse for your lack of knowledge

                      Isotops : have the same protons but different numbers of neutrons....thats why they differ in their atomic mass.

                      why would you mention Isotopes when we're talking polymerization of alkenes LOL .....you're mentioning random words blindly because you're uneducated about the topic.

                      You don't have to explain to me Isotopes. I explained it to you just right now, because you clearly were confused. LOL

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
                        Explain me his formula you mathematician...


                        LOL I just did ....did you understand it?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          this with isotope was sarcasm ....oh dewana




                          I think you even dont know the forumla of euler regarding imaginary numbers...

                          im talking about this ...i think you dont know this issue

                          Last edited by Afghanistan2010; 10-10-2011, 12:54 PM.
                          High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            um I just explained what Euler's formula a few posts above moron

                            don't say the isotope thing was sarcasm, you didn't know what you were talking about

                            you're a liar


                            or better yet ....Make Oath on Qur'an Sharif that you were being sarcastic

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
                              this with isotope was sarcasm ....oh dewana




                              I think you even dont know the forumla of euler regarding imaginary numbers...

                              im talking about this ...i think you dont know this issue


                              I wrote this same thing above

                              look

                              Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post

                              Euler's Formula simply states that Imaginary numbers have an identity which can be described using the corresponding Natural Number e raised to an imaginary is identical trigonometric computation of an imaginary number and follows a circular path

                              is that you're referring to? .

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post

                                or better yet ....Make Oath on Qur'an Sharif that you were being sarcastic

                                Make Oath that you werent sexually assaulted by your fellowe sect members...

                                I do not make oath by the mushaf (the noble book) but rather by Allah.

                                I make oath by Allah it was sarcasm with isotope.
                                High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X