Originally posted by khushal
View Post
Yeah he took Herat from Shah Rukh by force....and? Shah Rukh had his own principality and he was squabbling against the others. And even after he took it, he left Shah Rukh in power. By leaving someone in power, you're not deposing them
He created a perso-centric state, Qizilbash were culturally Persian. He squashed OTHER Qizilbash who were rebelling against Nader Shah after the assassination, and fragmenting his former empire. Notice that Abdalis "empire" nearly exactly matches the boudaries of Nader Shah's. In essence he was reconsolidating his master's empire.
Abdali was Nader Shah's servant. A loyal one too. Or he would have killed Shah Rukh.
The Hazaras and Qizilbash were allies?,...not so, If you read more you'll find that in the Kabul rebellion Most of the Qizilbash were along with the Durrani Khans against Shah Shuja because he cut their monetary allowances but still demanded their pledge allegiance. hmmm sound like power and money hungriness yet? Yes I think So.
I doubt people who had money and power like the Qizilbash did and were getting money would think the Briish are their "saviors"; just a better sugar daddy. Then there were Qizilbash who were ON the side of Shah Shuja, they definitely worked with the British BUT they wanted to keep Shah Shuja in power. Other Qizilbash were the ones who told Pashtuns that Shah Shuja was the lackey of the British and in this way they were trying to reconsolidate power ....see that power theme again?
The Hazara were oppressed, the Qizilbash were just power hawks. If they had any alliances it isnt because the Qizilbash needed saviors.
One thing I learned though is that you know absolutely nothing about Afghan history, NOTHING AT ALL. Pretty pathetic for someone who tries to feign credibility of "being there".





The point is they broke the copyright of ''Afghans'' 
Comment