i can't wait for tajikistans abdullah abdullah missile, with a payload of 160 pounds and a range of 5 feet 9 inches.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Naming of nuclear weapons after Afghan historical figures.
Collapse
X
-
There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.
Sayyid Qutb
-
"Own'? Sher shah suri was an ethnic afghan pashtun born in INDIA. NOT Pakistan.Originally posted by asad71 View PostThere are some heroes who belong to all Muslims. For instance Sher Shah Suri was our Emperor and hero, but Afghan-Pashtuns also own him. Ghazi Salahuddin, Amir Taimur, Tipu Sultan and so on are heroes of the Muslims."Revenge is a dish best served cold".
-Old Pashtun proverb

"My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"
Comment
-
Agar 23 September 2012 (pakistani missiles technology) On ARYNews Full Pro Part 2/2 - YouTube
this guy.. says.. "en key naam pa qaida tarikh key undar jo hai.. mumkeen hai..ghaznavi hai..ghiorri hai.. babur hai.. too ek to basically app messaging jo hai..woo india ko yahey detey hai.. key yey tamam woo nam hai jino neh hindustan keh tarikh ke undar... kafi takhleef payda ki un logo keh leye.. was that the purpose of naming and why naming the missiles"
Comment
-
"en key naam pa qaida tarikh key undar jo hai.. mumkeen hai..ghaznavi hai..ghiorri hai.. babur hai.. too ek to basically app messaging jo hai..woo india ko yahey detey hai.. key yey tamam woo nam hai jino neh hindustan keh tarikh ke undar... kafi takhleef payda ki un logo keh leye.. was that the purpose of naming and why naming the missiles"
basically what he is saying is that.. these are historical names.. who taught hindustanis a lesson and gave them hard time.. which is why we have chosen it for our missiles..
Comment
-
in all fairness Ghaznawi was a Turk, and Ghauri possibly a Tajik, Afghans claiming them is equally dishonest just because they inhabited in a region now known as Afghanistan does not mean they're Afghans in our senseOriginally posted by Admin Khan View PostAn artificial state, created by the British, will obviously try to use Afghan historical figures to scare Indians. Indians darn well know these are Afghan figures, and given that Pakistan has no history, they will obviously use the Muslim card and claim since those Afghans were Muslim, they can claim as their brethren.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
Comment
-
39ers!
The pakdefence think tank should use names like badmash I, or jhelum or multan or even char so bis especially if it is against their arch nemesis. Or gabar as in gabar sing.
Seriously, like the rev mentions the ownership is not exclusive. Imagine a venn diagram with afghans, Persians, moghuls and turks, with intersection set consisting of nader, ghauri abdali chingez, and taimur.Last edited by torkham; 12-01-2012, 04:11 AM.
Comment
-
Just about every Tajik I know considers himself an Afghan.Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Postin all fairness Ghaznawi was a Turk, and Ghauri possibly a Tajik, Afghans claiming them is equally dishonest just because they inhabited in a region now known as Afghanistan does not mean they're Afghans in our senseEven Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
Pakistan is a country with no culture, history or heroes. I would not mind them using our heroes, if they admitted they were Afghan. I heard some stupid pakis use ghaznavi or durrani as PAKISTANI "/&*&*ç HEROES and I explained them why they were Afghan and not paki, but they seemed to be so ashamed that I said that infront of all other people that they never talked to me again.
Comment

Comment