Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wahabism and Misyar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wahabism and Misyar

    The wahabis are such an evil cult that they have legalised PROSTITUTION in the garb of something they call MISYAR. Watch the video to understand that this wahabi misyar is the same thing as shia mutah. If this isnt innovation (bidda) then what is it then? And these wahabis claim to folow Quran and Sunnah. You wahabis are exposed.

    YouTube - Sheikh Touseef ur Rehman aur Misyar


    As if this wasnt enough the same wahabis have been exposed by Sunni Sufis where the wahabis even legalize nikah(marriage) with their own sisters:

    YouTube - Nikah with sister is allowed Wahabi Aalim Talib Ur Rehman's new fatwa

  • #2
    It is disgraceful that people will twist the words of holiness around to fit their own particular vice. This is nothing new, yet so much suffering comes from it.

    Comment


    • #3
      then they pick on the shia for Mutha, sick ppl

      Comment


      • #4
        nikah wit your own sister? This is disgusting.

        Comment


        • #5
          mutah equals misyar (this is the first time I have heard of this term)

          There is no difference
          this is disgusting and reveals that these guys are using religion to suit their own purposes.

          Comment


          • #6
            I couldn't really understand that well.

            Are the two being exactly equated here?

            The Nikah with a sister - it was a fatwa allowing this practice?

            The videos were too short.

            Maybe there were a couple of fanatics who agreed to this.
            Fringe elements lurk in the wings of every single religion.

            A sect should not be made responsible for the actions of a few bizarre people, of whom there are all over the world, especially today when Shaitan is working double and triple overtime trying to take people way off the track.

            If these two deeds were sanctioned on a widespread basis, wouldn't there be a thousand youtube videos angrily decrying the practices?

            Certainly much longer, detailed videos than these, which are only 1.5 MINUTES, would be flooding the Internet?!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Catya Sher View Post
              I couldn't really understand that well.

              Are the two being exactly equated here?

              The Nikah with a sister - it was a fatwa allowing this practice?

              The videos were too short.

              Maybe there were a couple of fanatics who agreed to this.
              Fringe elements lurk in the wings of every single religion.

              A sect should not be made responsible for the actions of a few bizarre people, of whom there are all over the world, especially today when Shaitan is working double and triple overtime trying to take people way off the track.

              If these two deeds were sanctioned on a widespread basis, wouldn't there be a thousand youtube videos angrily decrying the practices?

              Certainly much longer, detailed videos than these, which are only 1.5 MINUTES, would be flooding the Internet?!

              The nikah with sister was allowed in a Fatwa by the WAHABI imam called TaliburRahman (the guy with the hat )



              The wahabis are a fitna that Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) has warned us of and yet no one is taking heed of. And still people are following these wahabis.I dont know why in peoples eyes the Holy words of Prophet Mohammad doesnt weigh nothing , but what bull**** comes out of a wahabis/salafi mouth is concidered reality.Isnt this injustice done to our Holy Prophet Mohammad(pbuh) ?

              Here is a site with details that will wake up up wich exposed the wahabi fitna:

              SILENCING THE ENEMIES OF ISLAM FROM NAJD



              If you browse the net you will find many videos, articles and "religious fatwas" from wahabis that this kind of "temporarily marriage" ( mutah,prostitution) is allowed. These wahabis are sick. These people are beckoning people to hell fire.

              Many women activists have awoken and are fighting this kind of "marriages". This woman has a point:

              YouTube - Against Sharia courts ~ غادة جمشير




              Comment


              • #8
                dude if any1 is putting any1 off religion its u and the sangar dude... debate properly or not at all... all u 2 have done is act like childish school girls by acting who can come up with the bigger insult
                Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by shlombay
                  Nikah with sister is disgusting.

                  You are 100 % right ,but these wahabis have done this for ages and are still doing it ,and yet these wahabis claim they follow Islam.

                  O,people wake up! Wahabism is following Satan and theyr own desires. These people will take you to hell .This is why Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) WARNED us:


                  "In the period prior to the Day of Judgement, false and deceitful groups will emerge. They will say things to you, which neither you nor your forefathers will have ever heard before. Stay away from these deceitful people and do not let them come near you! Do not be misguided by them and do not let them cause strife amongst you!" (Sahih Muslim)


                  Wahabis are one of those groups that one should run away from and not listen to.
                  Last edited by Guest; 10-20-2010, 04:51 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
                    dude if any1 is putting any1 off religion its u and the sangar dude... debate properly or not at all... all u 2 have done is act like childish school girls by acting who can come up with the bigger insult

                    Maybe you practice mutah or misyar that is why it hurts to be confronted with your non islamic practice?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Pakhtun_Policy View Post
                      Maybe you practice mutah or misyar that is why it hurts to be confronted with your non islamic practice?
                      I rest my case.... dude I am neither a wahabi or a grave worshipping brelvi.... debate properly or not at all instead of hurling insults at each other and fellow forum members
                      Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        as for Mutah
                        Narrated 'Imran bin Husain: The Verse of muta was revealed in Allah's Book, so we performed it with Allah's Apostle, and nothing was revealed in Qur'an to make it illegal, nor did the Prophet prohibit it till he died. But the man (omar) just expressed what his own mind suggested
                        Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 43

                        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3250:

                        Abu Nadra reported: While I was in the company of Jabir b. Abdullah, a person came to him and said that Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Zubair differed on the two types of Mut'as (muta of Hajj and muta of women), whereupon Jabir said: We used to do these two during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger pbuh Umar then forbade us to do them, and so we did not revert to them.

                        *shows it was the 2nd caliph who stopped the practise

                        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3249:

                        Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported: We contracted temporary marriage giving a handful of (tales or flour as a dower during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger pbuh and durnig the time of Abu Bakr until 'Umar forbade it in the case of 'Amr b. Huraith

                        again showing the practise of mutah was followed after prophets death


                        Im not defending Mutah here... Im showing that it was banned by the 2nd caliph even according to sunni sources...
                        Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
                          I rest my case.... dude I am neither a wahabi or a grave worshipping brelvi.... debate properly or not at all instead of hurling insults at each other and fellow forum members
                          Who are you to tell me the conducts of debate? Where in my threads have I used any abusive language? All my threads are facts with refrences.

                          SubhanAllah!

                          If you aint a wahabi ,or "grave worshipping brelvi" ( as u have mentioned) ,then the only option is that either you are a shia (most likely) ,deobandi ( most likely) or a qadiyani or some other deviant.

                          If you dont like my threads ,then dont read them.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Pakhtun_Policy View Post
                            Who are you to tell me the conducts of debate? Where in my threads have I used any abusive language? All my threads are facts with refrences.

                            SubhanAllah!

                            If you aint a wahabi ,or "grave worshipping brelvi" ( as u have mentioned) ,then the only option is that either you are a shia (most likely) ,deobandi ( most likely) or a qadiyani or some other deviant.

                            If you dont like my threads ,then dont read them.
                            every one is a devient except u does that make u feel better? lol
                            as 5 refrences u might wanna look up ur sahih hadith which Ive posted that Mutah was allowed and banned not by prophet but by the 2nd caliph
                            Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
                              as for Mutah
                              Narrated 'Imran bin Husain: The Verse of muta was revealed in Allah's Book, so we performed it with Allah's Apostle, and nothing was revealed in Qur'an to make it illegal, nor did the Prophet prohibit it till he died. But the man (omar) just expressed what his own mind suggested
                              Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 43

                              Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3250:

                              Abu Nadra reported: While I was in the company of Jabir b. Abdullah, a person came to him and said that Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Zubair differed on the two types of Mut'as (muta of Hajj and muta of women), whereupon Jabir said: We used to do these two during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger pbuh Umar then forbade us to do them, and so we did not revert to them.

                              *shows it was the 2nd caliph who stopped the practise

                              Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3249:

                              Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported: We contracted temporary marriage giving a handful of (tales or flour as a dower during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger pbuh and durnig the time of Abu Bakr until 'Umar forbade it in the case of 'Amr b. Huraith

                              again showing the practise of mutah was followed after prophets death


                              Im not defending Mutah here... Im showing that it was banned by the 2nd caliph even according to sunni sources...

                              Ahh,, I get it now.. You are a SHIA!

                              .

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X