If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
the link is actually to Abdur Rahman Khan's book; if you actually had a clue what you were talking about you'd know that.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
you are a dumbass who avoids reality and live in lalaland.
face the reality a yemeni american Muta zillah has zero to say about Afghanistan.
just because your ancesters were burrying their kids alive and were practicing slavery doesnt mean Pashtuns also done it no matter how hard you try to
make up something.
no country/people is in moral position to criticise Pashtuns.
what does your desperate attempt at diverting away from the topic have to do with the Abdur Rahman Khan's book confirming that Pashtuns practicing Slavery?
why do you keep trying t change the subject and avoid the evidence .....and how am I the one avoiding reality when I'm the one who acknowledges evidence?
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
your evidence is as always coming out of your ass.
the reality is arabs did practice slavery and they had many slaves especially africans and nowadays they also practice is in places like dubai ,saudi,etc.
Pashtuns didnt so it doesnt matter how much you try to make your case against them,no evidence.
abdul rahman's book is no evidence neither is that khomeini worshiping' book.
get over yourself,neither did taliban practice slavery or your sikh and hindu claim.
Why isn't Abdur Rahman Khan', who by the way was the King of Afghanistan and the one who ratified the laws of Afghanistan at the time; not evidence ?
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
where is the quote where he says pashtuns practiced slavery.
page 277, scroll down to the bottom of the page, the annotation part.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReasonView Post
well if what you're saying is true that Pashuns wouldnt let other males near their women; then wouldn't that end up being the case?; where does it say it in Pashtunwali that you can't bring an outside female into your household? Show me a single shred of evidence that corroborates that.
Actually pashtun houses are separated into two sections , "kor" and "baitak". During most of the day times males are in baitak and visit kor after makham. So surely during day pradai women of your kalay would be visiting your home to meet women of your family, but you wont come infront of them...khushal is right.
da teezan shay os mung bandey slavery arayee.
Pukhtano pe tareekh ke dasey kar ne dey kelay kho detha pukhtane ham leka noro ekhkarey,sirf che de dey arabo da kar kelay no da os atmey ghwarey che pukhtane ham pe dey gholo ke kakar kee.
leka hagha mathal : da ghol pe dango wahee
domra beghairat nimsarray bacha ye....leka chandakh tar obeh lande khpel sar putawey aw maghza di dubay shwah; ...ta khpel zan pakhto tareekh wa na lwastal magum domra khabari khabari key agar chi da tareekh ezda na da.
maghza di der gada wada da; awal ta wayal "mung da qabrstan ta zayar na koo" da Saudi Arabian Wahhbiyano shan magum oss wayee "da arabo mrayatob na koo"
you are so confused sir; you don't know if you want to be a Slave of Saudi Wahhabis or their enemies.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
its not evidence, its an annotation. your too desperate. Dude if enslavement existed in the culture, I would admit it. I would not deny what is true. The best you can do is find an annotation. I told you before pashtun culture is in sync with nature and slavery in not in sync with nature.
I agree with your beautiful analysis.
Pashtuns never kept slaves, they kept "hamsayas", who were their vassals not slaves .
I agree pashtuns never kept slaves. Pashtuns love freedom and keeping slaves is against their love for freedom. As Luffy said they had vassels but not slaves. Pashtuns are too conservative to let slaves inside their homes just in case. The Arabs used to castrate the male slaves but pashtuns have avoided them altogether. Some pashtuns kings might have brought some slaves from India but its an exception not the rule.
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
I agree pashtuns never kept slaves. Pashtuns love freedom and keeping slaves is against their love for freedom. As Luffy said they had vassels but not slaves. Pashtuns are too conservative to let slaves inside their homes just in case. The Arabs used to castrate the male slaves but pashtuns have avoided them altogether. Some pashtuns kings might have brought some slaves from India but its an exception not the rule.
is this proof by popular acceptance or is this proof by evidence?
[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.
Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReasonView Post
is this proof by popular acceptance or is this proof by evidence?
What sort of evidence. A book written by farangis?
Even the books written by British colonialists don't mention anything about pashtuns keeping slaves but they do mention Indians who did jobs in pashtun lands which pashtuns considered too low for themselves such as selling bangles and so on.
Well where is the proof that proves pashtuns kept slaves? preferablly from an Afghan/pashtun writer.
Comment