Why Evolutiontheory is just a theory and not an Evidence

[ScimitarXEdge]

wow Taliban lie under Allah(swt)'s name ...hahaha

[Afghanistan2010]

so you dont believe in Allah and the last day ?
why dont you take the oath that you were never sexually assaulted by your sect?.

[ScimitarXEdge]

becaause I know you're a bacha baz halek parast who gets off by sex stories involving other men and it's creepy

[Toramana]

becaause I know you're a bacha baz halek parast who gets off by sex stories involving other men and it's creepy

Ahlan wa sahlan marhaba ya akhi...

[Alchemist]

[ozymandias]

At the risk of continuing the beating...

It appears that confusion here, among other things, is that the original poster does not understand the definitions of "theory" and "law" in science.

A Law is "A set of observed regularities expressed in a concise verbal or mathematical statement. (Krimsley, 1995)"

A Theory is "An explanation for an observation or series of observations that is substantiated by a considerable body of evidence (Krimsley, 1995)"

The reason the Theory of Evolution is not the Law of Evolution is because it cannot be expressed mathematically. A Theory is *not* a "weak Law" or a guess, it is simply a different body of knowledge. While definitions of Theories and Laws vary a bit, the definitions are universally based on the fact that both Theories and Laws are accepted as scientific truth.

I'm sorry to say that regardless of your objections to the validity of the Theory of Evolution, they are regarded as irrelevant by the scientific community, and the Theory of Evolution is as true as any Law.

For more details on the differences between a Theory and a Law, feel free to read more here: Scientific Laws and Theories

[Leonine]

Asalam alykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh,

As a student in chemistry,it came to my mind.
Its very simple to understand this what will follow,and it is a punch in the face of those who support and believe in the Evolution but yet had not overthought it,this way,how it will follow now.


What is Evolution ?

Scientists "believe,think" that the life of the human or the homo started many many thousands of years,they say that the life of the animals or the living things (like bakteria,cells and and) changed and changed because of the environmental changes.All started by a cell(until now it is not known where it came from),this cell according to some scientists it came from a meteorit,others says it formed itself , yet some believe it was created by some aliens (lol),however let us continue.This cell formed and shaped and it was something different , then it continued then it became a worm , it continued .......fish , something similar to a crocodile or a devilsnake(explained by neil shubin),it continued ..... to a homo which is the forfather of the monkies and human.Some scientists has the opinion the direct forefather of the human was in central africa,according to european scientists that it started somewhere in caucasus (until now not known).
This was greatly explained by Charls Darwin,and others who followed him,and corrected many errors.

lol the cell didnt just come there....according to evolution, there was all these pre-oxygen atmospheric gases...they were zapped by lightning, made monomers of various amino acids, lipids, etc...these had to be close to hydrothermal vents and pools...they formed polymers..lipids encircled nucleic acid...voila! a cell!!! .a self-replicating cell formed from this lol...WHICH IS BULL****

[ScimitarXEdge]

what a refutation, just label something "bull****" ...and that's all it takes LOL

retard

[ozymandias]

lol the cell didnt just come there....according to evolution, there was all these pre-oxygen atmospheric gases...they were zapped by lightning, made monomers of various amino acids, lipids, etc...these had to be close to hypothermal vents and pools...they formed polymers..lipids encircled nucleic acid...voila! a cell!!! .a self-replicating cell formed from this lol...WHICH IS BULL****

Care to cite any evidence to back up your 'bull****' claim?

[Alchemist]

http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-biology-62/evolution-theory-contradicts-quran-hadiths-19653/index44.html#post516027

http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-biology-62/evolution-why-us-7060/index37.html#post465306

http://www.pashtunforums.com/religion-15/evolution-contradicts-islam-16487/

http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-biology-62/survey-human-remains-findings-1-9-mil-old-contradicts-evolution-theories-20748/index4.html#post516469

http://www.pashtunforums.com/science-29/why-creationism-farcical-evolution-meritable-scientific-concept-18463/index42.html#post490291

****mitar suffers either from amnesia, delusional psychosis or ADHD...

[ozymandias]

http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-...tml#post516027


http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-...tml#post465306

http://www.pashtunforums.com/religio...s-islam-16487/

http://www.pashtunforums.com/nature-...tml#post516469

http://www.pashtunforums.com/science...tml#post490291


****mitar suffers either from amnesia, delusional psychosis or ADHD...

Afghanistan2010 started the new thread, so evidently *he* is the one that has problems...

[ScimitarXEdge]

Ozymandias....Alchemist is someone who's lost numerous debates against me; and instead of being a grown up and accepting defeat he's made it his personal vendetta to buttheads with me anywhere on this forum

he will ignore crucial details and place the focus on me.

by the way Ozymandias....you seem like you have sufficient knowledge about scientific subjects albeit, I disagree that laws of nature needn't necessarily be defined by quantitative expressions, but they do have to have observational consistency.

Don't let yourself get derailed by Alchemist; he uses many intellectually dishonest tactics; I noticed he performed his classic Straw-Man arguments on you too; he does that to pretty much everyone.

Just stay cool headed, if you want info on him, I'm more than willing to divulge; He's quite a hypocrite, and while that doesn't necessarily debunk his statements; it shows he's disingenuous and also posturing on here

[ozymandias]

Ozymandias....Alchemist is someone who's lost numerous debates against me; and instead of being a grown up and accepting defeat he's made it his personal vendetta to buttheads with me anywhere on this forum

I've noticed....

he will ignore crucial details and place the focus on me.

by the way Ozymandias....you seem like you have sufficient knowledge about scientific subjects albeit, I disagree that laws of nature needn't necessarily be defined by quantitative expressions, but they do have to have observational consistency.

That is far from a definitive definition, but it very clearly illustrates the differences between Laws and Theories. They are both believed true and accurate to the same degree, but cover the materials in different ways.

Don't let yourself get derailed by Alchemist; he uses many intellectually dishonest tactics; I noticed he performed his classic Straw-Man arguments on you too; he does that to pretty much everyone.

Indeed. It seems that he is completely unable to hold a debate or discussion without resorting to intellectual dishonesty. I fear that his faith is too weak for him to actually discuss it, and instead he feels the needs to defend it with what ever straws he can grasp.

I wish he would discuss things rationally, he might have an interesting perspective to share. As it is, we will never know.

Just stay cool headed, if you want info on him, I'm more than willing to divulge; He's quite a hypocrite, and while that doesn't necessarily debunk his statements; it shows he's disingenuous and also posturing on here

I'll let him do the damage to himself on his own. Thanks, though.

[Alchemist]

Afghanistan2010 started the new thread, so evidently *he* is the one that has problems...

Evidently, ****mitar is rehashing arguments that have been debunked already -

Simple minded folks like your self and ****mitar who don't have even a grade 9 understanding of biology believe that evolution proceeds as A > B > C > D, in a linear fashion. However in reality complex biochemical pathways are comprised of multiple components that interact in intricate ways that are more sophisticated than an automotive manufacturing plant.

Suffice it to say that Evolution is only a creation narrative. It is the myth of this century that you choose to believe on blind faith. All of evolution is based on palaeontology, which is more of an arts than a science. It is not the function of a law to narrate the past, but to predict the future ...because evolution cannot and has not made any predictive hypothesis, it will remain open to debate. Show me proof for speciation? Do you know what was ****mitar's proof? That donkeys and horses can mate to produce a mule, he believed the reverse could be true, that a mule could turn into either a donkey or a horse LOL. He doesn't even know how a gene relates to a protein and he wanted to argue with me what genetic markers were. Now he is trying to validate the Miller Ury experiment?

[ScimitarXEdge]

I



Indeed. It seems that he is completely unable to hold a debate or discussion without resorting to intellectual dishonesty. I fear that his faith is too weak for him to actually discuss it, and instead he feels the needs to defend it with what ever straws he can grasp.
.

Of course his faith is weak, and perhaps even non-existent. You should see some of what he advocates in Politics Thread; he glorifies Taliban suicide bombers who end up killing more Muslim afghans as heroes....while he lives in Canada collecting Canadian welfare ....irony eh?