Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Evolutiontheory is just a theory and not an Evidence

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • what did you say that didn't make any sense? I actually explained euler's formula on the first page, but because you're an idiot and lied about studying chemistry and other easy to expose forgeries, you seem unable to comprehend what I said.

    Comment


    • yes and santa claus will come soon to deliver you a huge present from your forefathers who live on mars with other monkies.
      High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

      Comment


      • Ok Fake Chemist :P at least I don't need to lie about my credentials like you do. pathetic.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
          Ok Fake Chemist :P at least I don't need to lie about my credentials like you do. pathetic.

          okay...
          High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

          Comment


          • that was hilarious when I caught you lying about knowing chemistry

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
              that was hilarious when I caught you lying about knowing chemistry
              you caught me while you were flying on a unicorn as guinevere the littel princess i guess.
              High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

              Comment


              • so you mean the whole Isotope mix up and the fact you didn't know the how to polymerize something from Alkenes, was just a fluke? LOL

                you are delusional.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                  so you mean the whole Isotope mix up and the fact you didn't know the how to polymerize something from Alkenes, was just a fluke? LOL

                  you are delusional.

                  InshaAllah Allah will guide you , i pray inshaAllah that Allah enlightens your heart as he enlightend the hearts of other atheists until Allah brought light into their lifes and brings you away from the kuffar you were taught in your sect.
                  High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                  Comment


                  • I'm not an Atheist, I'm intellectually convinced of the existence of Allah(swt)....and if my sect is kufr, why do Muslim scholars use Mu'tazili Tafsir like Zamakhshari?

                    Comment


                    • Scimitar dull edge is a shameless Agnostic "Theist". He denies Khalq. Therefore he denies the attribute of Allah as Al Khaliq. That makes him a mushrik.
                      None of his views are supported by any traditional mu'tazali scholar. He is just fooling himself into thinking that he is one when really he has never met one in his life!


                      And Levanay is just as delusional as dull edge because his counter to my argument doesn't even remotely touch on the issues I have raised. I didn't make any "irreducible complexes" argument so why is he mention Micheal Behe when I havent? This clown keeps trying to throw me in a bandwagon that is deemed outcast so that he feels that he is "in the know".

                      The truth is that in all their postings on this thread, not scimitar or levanay have presented one shred of scientific proof! They have not made any scientific debate! These fools don't even know the first thing about biology but just keep making "haughty theatrical posts" full of slander and baseless accusation.

                      My challenge still stands. Present proof of a beneficial mutation or just ...STFU

                      Comment


                      • Uhh, tell me, Mr "Afghanistan2010" - what is your educational background?

                        Do you possess a university degree or any accreditation in the field of biology or a related discipline?

                        Are you seriously disputing Darwin's Theory of Evolution?
                        Are you some kind of dropout from reality?



                        So the above video summarizes your understanding of how the Earth and living things came into existence.

                        You don't do yourself any credit by stubbornly persisting in your challenge of basic rational scientific knowledge.

                        Comment


                        • He claimed he studies chemistry; but that was shown as a hoax, he confused Isotope as being an Isomer, it was pathetic to watch. and he tried to dig himself out by claiming he was being sarcastic he also claimed that Methane was an Alkene that's how I knew he was phony.
                          Last edited by ScimitarXEdge; 10-16-2011, 04:58 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
                            Scimitar dull edge is a shameless Agnostic "Theist". He denies Khalq. Therefore he denies the attribute of Allah as Al Khaliq. That makes him a mushrik.
                            None of his views are supported by any traditional mu'tazali scholar. He is just fooling himself into thinking that he is one when really he has never met one in his life!

                            name some traditonal Mu'tazili scholars and their treatises and what their conclusion on Al-Khalq is.

                            And your accusation is false, I never denied Allah(swt) as creator as false, but "how" he creates is where I differ. He creates by evolution.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                              He claimed he studies chemistry; but that was shown as a hoax, he confused Isotope as being an Isomer, it was pathetic to watch. and he tried to dig himself out by claiming he was being sarcastic he also claimed that Methane was an Alkene that's how I knew he was phony.
                              That's funny - I'm a chemical engineer by training (although I work as a software developer by profession), and physics is a personal hobby of mine. So maybe Mr 2010 can enlighten us with his knowledge of chemistry and other physical sciences. I'm sure it'll be quite entertaining.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                                name some traditonal Mu'tazili scholars and their treatises and what their conclusion on Al-Khalq is.

                                And your accusation is false, I never denied Allah(swt) as creator as false, but "how" he creates is where I differ. He creates by evolution.
                                LOL


                                This is the most absurd and ridiculous statement of the century!

                                When you deny the existence of Adam and Eve (peace be upon them) and you deny the miracles performed by the Anbiyaa, you pretty much deny the attribute of Allah as "Fa3alun lima yurid" and "qadirun 3ala kuli shai".

                                "He creates by evolution" makes as little sense as saying "He created evolution". Evolution is not a thing or a mechanism of creation as you word it.

                                You are full b.s Mahmood.
                                You are not even 1/100th of the intelligent scholar you think you are. LOL

                                Ozy ... I hope you get the paradox of "Selection for"/"selection now that you see that there are people out there who think evolution is god himself..or maybe "mothernature".

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X