Originally posted by Azmal
View Post
But the question is how do you define Arabic culture in the first place? What would be the characteristic traits that would make something "their" culture as opposed to "Islam". Culture can't simply be language because then You'd be following "Angrez" culture simply by speaking English. Does the fact that Modern Science uses terms from Latin and Greek imply that Science is a vassal for Greco-Roman culture?
What I'm suggesting here is the reason you seem to be claiming Cultural Imperiaiism by Arabs is based on the idea that Arabic is a Liturgical Language. Every religion has a standard Liturgical language. If Pashtuns converted to Zoroastrianism tomorrow to Learn the Gathas they'd have to learn Avestan; they would not be able to perform the rites of the "Zardushti" religion in Pashto.
Likewise Greek/Latin became in a metaphoric sense "Liturgical" to Modern Science; while they don't need to study Greek/Latin as a whole they have to understand the meanings of the terms which are derived from Greek/Latin. How Sociologists define Cultural Imperialism is much more dynamic and broader than language.
You speak in terms which are incredibly vague; You can't have Cultural Imperialism unless you can clearly define what it is.


Comment