Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Taliban do what they do and Why Scimitar is an intellectual fraud

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    u are overestimating public support.

    mexican drug cartels have only gotten stronger in the last 10 years but how much public support do u think they have?
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

    Comment


    • #47
      US, not NATO. Stop saying NATO. Say US

      and US has killed thousands of Afghans. Talibs do not target civilians deliberately. US does.

      Say US, not NATO

      Comment


      • #48
        ^ are u a turk or something? LOL

        nato = US's bitch. u do realize there are more foreign armies occupying afg other than just the US, right?
        There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

        Sayyid Qutb

        Comment


        • #49
          thats my point. It is US.

          Say US, when someone says NATO, they are excusing US. Like, they say NATO airtstrike kills 35 Afghans. They don't say US Airstrike.

          so someone who says NATO all the time is covering and excusing US.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
            What do the standards of Kufar have to do with Muslims

            are you saying there are Laws that supercede Islam as the final standard of Moral and Ethial truth?

            that's shirk

            that article is from September 2006; everyone knows that the Taliban exceeding the NATO civilian murder toll was surpassed long after that point

            pathetic fool
            example is here. First he says that Talibs are killing more Afghan than "NATO."

            This is false, and can not be proven by UN reports which are a tool of US.

            But note how he says NATO, and not US. It is like US is not there.

            He keeps saying NATO instead of US. US propaganda

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
              ^ are u a turk or something? LOL

              nato = US's bitch. u do realize there are more foreign armies occupying afg other than just the US, right?
              You do realize that CENTCOM is monitoring this website and flagging it's citizens as potential sleeper cells?

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by CharlieChaplin View Post
                thats my point. It is US.

                Say US, when someone says NATO, they are excusing US. Like, they say NATO airtstrike kills 35 Afghans. They don't say US Airstrike.

                so someone who says NATO all the time is covering and excusing US.

                its a military alliance working together.

                when the US kills afghans we say the US did it, we don't say the army or marines or special forces. same deal with the US-NATO deal.
                There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                Sayyid Qutb

                Comment


                • #53
                  ok so according to the staff here, charlie was unknownprince lol
                  There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                  Sayyid Qutb

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
                    You do realize that CENTCOM is monitoring this website and flagging it's citizens as potential sleeper cells?



                    even CENTCOM knows that its NATO's sugar daddy.
                    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                    Sayyid Qutb

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by CharlieChaplin View Post
                      example is here. First he says that Talibs are killing more Afghan than "NATO."

                      This is false, and can not be proven by UN reports which are a tool of US.

                      But note how he says NATO, and not US. It is like US is not there.

                      He keeps saying NATO instead of US. US propaganda
                      This is only your diversion tactic

                      read from NATO's own website

                      NATO - Homepage

                      An alliance of countries from North America and Europe committed to fulfilling the goals of the North Atlantic Treaty signed on 4 April 1949

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by randolph85 View Post


                        even CENTCOM knows that its NATO's sugar daddy.
                        they know a lot of things, but we are talking about the image of the US in the public sphere. they function as the PR department for the US not nato.

                        I hope you can understand the difference son.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          there is none, they're one in the same apparatus, the issue of trying to argue NATO vs. U.S. is purely grasping for straw

                          it's like people saying That we're denyng the role of the Shaitan , by calling him the IBLIS

                          in short it's all the same, no need to differentiate

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            We are just saying that you don't directly name US as an aggressor because you fear being bagged up and shipped off to a torture camp off the grid. You are a coward, that is all.
                            If you say NATO, then it sounds a heck of a lot less unpatriotic to the guys in the white van...if not so, then we'd like you to say US instead of NATO. No biggie

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              You're saying that based on your own delusional insanity and complete disregard for the lives of Muslims

                              I don't think it would sound less "unpatriotic"; considering that the U.S. established NATO. Then again you're an uneducated high school drop out who works at fast food places; you wouldn't know pertinent details like that

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                prove me wrong by just saying US instead of NATO. simple enough.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X