Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Taliban do what they do and Why Scimitar is an intellectual fraud

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
    You should man up son.

    You said there is a natural resistance to the OCCUPYING forces.

    now you are back peddling and saying that the "natural resistance" is not a resistance but actually a "natural cooperation" through the government with the occupation.

    how does that make sense to you?

    and you call your self a "logician"?

    No I'm not back peddling at all, you're merely making selective reading. The Natural resistance was there, but much like Iraq, the Taliban's tactics harming Afghan civilians made the civilians believe the Government and working with them is a better option.

    So the Natural resistance was unnaturally reversed by the Taliban. This is exactly what happened in Iraq too, how do you think Sunnis Militats who were sabotaging every front of the NATO Apparatus in Iraq suddenly turned sides and went against Alqaeda?


    It makes sense because as a Logicitian I can comprehend different dimensions of what's happening around me' rather live in your superificial incompetent comprehension that it has to always be "either or".

    Comment


    • #32
      I think both Al-Chemist and SE are right about each other in a way---both are not genuine intellectuals---one Al-Chemist (trying to prove arguments with psuedo-intellectualism) is using Al-Chemy...the other, a desert dweller, lacks the foundational intellectual capacity...

      Comment


      • #33
        This is coming from Toramana, someone who I mentally brutalized so severely him and his band of sell-out House Slave servants of Imperialism ran away in defeat. Don't try and mask your shame too desperately we know you were sired by a farangay. the greatest shame imaginable in Pashtun society

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
          No I'm not back peddling at all, you're merely making selective reading. The Natural resistance was there, but much like Iraq, the Taliban's tactics harming Afghan civilians made the civilians believe the Government and working with them is a better option.

          So the Natural resistance was unnaturally reversed by the Taliban. This is exactly what happened in Iraq too, how do you think Sunnis Militats who were sabotaging every front of the NATO Apparatus in Iraq suddenly turned sides and went against Alqaeda?


          It makes sense because as a Logicitian I can comprehend different dimensions of what's happening around me' rather live in your superificial incompetent comprehension that it has to always be "either or".

          So basically there is no natural resistance because there is no occupation?


          Or there is an occupation but the natural resistance, unnaturally became unressisstent ...


          OK ..

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
            This is coming from Toramana, someone who I mentally brutalized so severely him and his band of sell-out House Slave servants of Imperialism ran away in defeat. Don't try and mask your shame too desperately we know you were sired by a farangay. the greatest shame imaginable in Pashtun society
            "I mentally brutalized" LOL

            You are such a douchebag.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Toramana View Post
              I think both Al-Chemist and SE are right about each other in a way---both are not genuine intellectuals---one Al-Chemist (trying to prove arguments with psuedo-intellectualism) is using Al-Chemy...the other, a desert dweller, lacks the foundational intellectual capacity...
              No I am not an intellectual.

              I never claimed to be one, sir.

              You can be the intellectual.

              I am a labourer. A poor man. A peasant in modern times. I am the simple. I am the plain.

              You can be the smart one but no one is foolish enough to follow you.

              Comment


              • #37
                And you really think that in Iraq there is no more resistance?
                110 iraqi civilians died and 130 were wounded, 42 police officers died and 105 injured, 33 iraqi soldiers died and 82 soldiers wounded ...just in September ... I guess because they were partying too hard because of all that lack of resistance.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
                  So basically there is no natural resistance because there is no occupation?


                  Or there is an occupation but the natural resistance, unnaturally became unressisstent ...


                  OK ..


                  No there is , but it's not the Taliban; and the natural resistance would have been greater except the Taliban forced them to the otherside

                  clear now or does your desperate obnoxious repetition of fallacy require me to repeat this more so you finally comprehend it?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Alchemist View Post
                    No I am not an intellectual.

                    I never claimed to be one, sir.

                    You can be the intellectual.

                    I am a labourer. A poor man. A peasant in modern times. I am the simple. I am the plain.

                    You can be the smart one but no one is foolish enough to follow you.


                    You're a seller of Pork; you own a Harram business for Profit; you are no simple man or plain man, you're a Charlatan and Fraud who perverts religion to hide behind his own Nefarious narcissistic ventures and yet contradict the religion you claim to follow

                    you're a Hypocrite of the worst form

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      You are a douchebag.


                      Basically...what I want you guys to have understood from what I have posted is this - Violence is necessary. It is also hallal.

                      Violence is purification.

                      It is a vital part of the process of nation building.

                      Even though Ghandi preached peace, it was violence that won india it's independence. All "modernized" nations spend a great deal of their energy in manufacturing guns and tanks and airplanes and they even sell it to each other. The whites, americans and europeans are where they are because they used EXTREME violent measures. When they came to America they wiped the natives off the map. They enslaved the natives of Africa. If there is no resistance, then there is no hope for the survival of your culture and heritage...and history is proof of that.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Violence at the cost of other Muslim lives is necessary you munafiq traitor?

                        What sort of drugs have you been doing in Canada? has the worms in the Pork you've been eating rotting your brain? explains the conspiracy nut approach you use.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Who is Muslim and who is not?

                          Only allah knows ...

                          You are not Allah ...

                          so stop pretending to be

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            If you really believed that, you wouldn't be ok with the Taliban murdering people under the pretexts that they arent Muslims

                            since Allah is the measure of who is Muslim and who isn't

                            then you are definitely not one; since Allah(swt) identifies people like you as traitors

                            Check mate.
                            Last edited by Haris; 10-07-2011, 12:36 PM. Reason: language

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              LOL

                              after three days of debate you still don't get it.

                              Even if the taliban were not muslim, they have the right to use any means necessary to drive out the occupiers. Let's say they were hindus...still if they did kill locals, they would lose support, their size would shrink and their operational scope diminish. If that were true, obama wouldn't have ordered a troop surge. So if the US has to increase fire and man power, then it means that the Taliban are stronger now than they were before. And believe it or not dumbass...suicide bombing happens in proportion to NATO bombing....yet still NATO bombings kill more innocent civilans than suicide bombings:


                              The admittedly incomplete data set indicates that Afghan civilian casualties account for some 65 percent of suicide car bomb attack victims (contrary to numbers - 84 percent - bandied-about by the occupation forces9). U.S/NATO military personnel accounted for about 17 percent of the car bomb deaths. The relative accuracy of the car bomb is further enhanced insofar as many of the reported car bomb attacks succeeded in injuring members of the U.S./NATO forces. Sometimes, the target of the suicide attackers is a high-profile Afghan foe as in the March 12, 2006, suicide attack in Kabul which killed two civilians but succeeded in wounding the target, former Afghan president Sibghatullah Mujaddedi.

                              Suicide car bomb attacks are typically carried out in civilian-rich areas (as the Table 1 above indicates) and, as such inflict death and injury upon innocent bystanders. In order to make a comparison with civilian casualties caused by U.S. so-called "precision bombing," one must choose U.S./NATO bombing attacks carried out in a comparable universe, namely civilian-rich areas.
                              Civilian Consequences of Suicide vs. 'Precision' Bombings in Afghanistan

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                What do the standards of Kufar have to do with Muslims

                                are you saying there are Laws that supercede Islam as the final standard of Moral and Ethial truth?

                                that's shirk

                                that article is from September 2006; everyone knows that the Taliban exceeding the NATO civilian murder toll was surpassed long after that point

                                pathetic fool

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X