Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason
View Post
that was what i was kind of getting at, but not really lol. afghanistan and pakistan of today are external constructs which have little legitimacy, but legitimacy is relative so we can leave that for another debate. what i was approaching was that pashtuns loyalties to pakistan are politically based, had they been absorbed by china they would be proud chinese today. on the other side of the coin you have pashtuns who are proud to be afghan but hate their governments. what i was getting at was that there was a notion of an afghanistan, based on the local homeland of pashtuns long before europeans had a chance to shape our nations. an afghanistan defined by geography, culture, race, language, that didn't have to proclaim their land as afghanistan but was recognized as such by outsiders like babur.


Comment