Afghanistan major non-NATO U.S. ally?

[khushal]

But according to the same people who wrote the international law; NATO is not occupying they're assisting an allied Government, the current one against a terrorist organization

Thus thiis argument holds no weight since Islam and Afghans do not accept international law as their canon. The moral burden of endangering Afghan lives is the Taliban.

what are you talking about. they admit and consider afghanistan an occupied country.
The law I am talking about does not contradict with neither Islam or logic. we already talked about this and you lost, why are you bringing it up again?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

what are you talking about. they admit and consider afghanistan an occupied country.
The law I am talking about does not contradict with neither Islam or logic. we already talked about this and you lost, why are you bringing it up again?

SOME American/European citizens consider it an occupation, but there is no official Governmental declaration by NATO, America or NATO members states that it is an occupation.Of course you and I both know it is; but that doesn't change that the moral burden of Taliban deaths of civilians is the Talibans.

your argument is moot

[khushal]

SOME American/European citizens consider it an occupation, but there is no official Governmental declaration by NATO, America or NATO members states that it is an occupation.Of course you and I both know it is; but that doesn't change that the moral burden of Taliban deaths of civilians is the Talibans.

your argument is moot

The official statement says it is a liberation. The moral and legal burdon of the misery the afghans are in rest on the occupiers. I am not saying that each person or group that commits murder or other crime has a free pass, but the society itself can not address the issues unless it is free to do so. The occupation itself prevents them from doing so, it is the cancer.

The first step to stabalizing the country is to get rid of the cancer so the country can heal itself.

[khushal]

according to mutawakil, they did try to compromise on bin laden when it looked like an attack was imminent. before, they just thought it was a bluff.

they tried to compromise by offering to hand him to a neutral third country. they never thought it was a bluff. They threatened Pakistan with nuclear weapons if they did not cooperate. The US was very serious.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

they tried to compromise by offering to hand him to a neutral third country. they never thought it was a bluff. They threatened Pakistan with nuclear weapons if they did not cooperate. The US was very serious.

where did they threaten Pakistan with nukes?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

The official statement says it is a liberation. country can heal itself.

well that's what counts in respects to international law, official decrees, therefore your claim which was already useless and irrelevant, doesn't apply even in accord to international law.

Your argument fails either way

[JattApache]

It's nice if Afghan army have F22s
They will defend themselves against the talibans after 2014

I see that the taliban supporters, Shadowboy and khusal worry a lot about the F22's in the hands of the afghan army. Because they know if it happens, the talibans will never rule kabul again .

[khushal]

where did they threaten Pakistan with nukes?

A slap to Pakistani Ex President - YouTube

[khushal]

It's nice if Afghan army have F22s
They will defend themselves against the talibans after 2014

I see that the taliban supporters, Shadowboy and khusal worry a lot about the F22's in the hands of the afghan army. Because they know if it happens, the talibans will never rule kabul again .

you don't bomb your own people, you make peace with them. go give your own country advice and tell them to start bombing their own people.

[khushal]

well that's what counts in respects to international law, official decrees, therefore your claim which was already useless and irrelevant, doesn't apply even in accord to international law.

Your argument fails either way

Thats not what counts. Truth is what counts and the truth is that it is an occupied country, you have admitted it yourself. your just trying to win the argument, you don't care about truth, you are being arrogant and intellectually dishonest.

besides that, you have not explained how this particular international contradicts shariah.

[JattApache]

you don't bomb your own people, you make peace with them. go give your own country advice and tell them to start bombing their own people.

That's why talibans are bombing their own people with their suicide bombing ?
And the Afghan army is fighting the talibans

[RevolutionThroughReason]

A slap to Pakistani Ex President - YouTube[/URL]

I've seen that before ....where does he mention nukes? You specifically said nukes. no back peddling now

[BigAl]

they said they would bomb the porkistanis into stone age.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Thats not what counts. Truth is what counts and the truth is that it is an occupied country, you have admitted it yourself. your just trying to win the argument, you don't care about truth, you are being arrogant and intellectually dishonest.

besides that, you have not explained how this particular international contradicts shariah.

Well if "truth" is what counts then international law has no merit since it isn't based on Truth; but man made lawss ... You're zero for zero

now for the explanation; because in Islam the wrong doer(s) are the one responsible for wrong doing, not someone else.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

they said they would bomb the porkistanis into stone age.

but that's not saying nuking Khushal specifically said nukes