Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is more dangerous for Pashtuns: Tajiks or Panjabis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by KingKhan View Post
    Am already dead, and Tajiks already took over Afghanistan. They also do have Pashto dramas filmed in Peshawer.

    Forget the drama part, that's done. In the university the majority language being spoken and lectured is Dari, even in University of Jalalabad. You don't need to know Pashto to survive anywhere in Afghanistan, since they all understand Dari. This is how you slowly lose a country, and a language.
    no need to be barbaric about it. Feel free to go down there's and open an all Pashto university for Pashtuns only all you want.
    I would rather finish this stinky shrimp wrap than carry this silly conversation with you.

    Sword boy, if someone came to your village and gathered all your men and killed them one by one and then dumped them in a welll , you too would be raping people.

    I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.

    non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by DaZahroJaam. View Post
      no need to be barbaric about it. Feel free to go down there's and open an all Pashto university for Pashtuns only all you want.
      I would rather finish this stinky shrimp wrap than carry this silly conversation with you.

      Sword boy, if someone came to your village and gathered all your men and killed them one by one and then dumped them in a welll , you too would be raping people.
      Your confusing me darling; your second paragraph has nothing to do with my argument, or the debate I was having with you. So your admitting the slow and silent coup?

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by khushal View Post
        I thought that goes for everyone. Everyones worst enemy is him/herself.

        The afghans enemy is foreign intervention. Take away foreign intervention and let the afghans fight it out so they can learn that fighting among each other solves nothing.
        Very concise and to the point.

        case closed.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by KingKhan View Post
          Your confusing me darling; your second paragraph has nothing to do with my argument, or the debate I was having with you. So your admitting the slow and silent coup?
          in the second paragraph I was not talking to you. I was talking to scimitarEdge.

          I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.

          non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
            Learn english and study the word liberal before you conclude that someone is speaking nonsense..

            lib·er·al

               /ˈlɪbərəl, ˈlɪbrəl/ Show Spelled[lib-er-uhl, lib-ruhl] Show IPA
            –adjective 1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.





            This isnt wahhabi saudi arabia we believe in forms of Liberalism (even that word is from the Latin liberalis, "of freedom") is the belief in the importance of liberty and equal rights.
            lol i knew whats it mean !! i meant do u agree with what Liberalism say ? lik if ur sis want to wear bikini or have a bf and ......etc would u mind that ?
            its freedom LOL :D

            and what the **** u know about what wahabi means ? what the **** make u call muslims in saudi arabi wahabi ? who the **** make u learn that ?

            Comment


            • #66
              Kingkhan manzarah ghundala hasay khpal zan staray kway..........result staso makh da maga result chay mung sa guman kawu........

              Haga GUNAHGAR hem na mung KAFIR shu........
              .....


              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by DaZahroJaam. View Post
                Sword boy, if someone came to your village and gathered all your men and killed them one by one and then dumped them in a welll , you too would be raping people.[/B][/COLOR][/FONT]


                that is pure bull****, rape is an act of asserting power; the reason those people do such things is to merely an excuse to feel powerful. These people had to already be that way to engage in such things.

                I have never heard of someone raping women because their men were dumped in wells.

                You sure are stupid today...or maybe you already were, but I have never noticed before.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                  that is pure bull****, rape is an act of asserting power; the reason those people do such things is to merely an excuse to feel powerful. These people had to already be that way to engage in such things.

                  I have never heard of someone raping women because their men were dumped in wells.

                  You sure are stupid today...or maybe you already were, but I have never noticed before.
                  I became stupid yesterday 25 minutes after you posted that stupid comment on zari's thread. Firtunay for you , I haven't had a chance to express my stupidity propey since then. When I do , it will be fun.. Fir me at least.

                  I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.

                  non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Aab-e-Hayat View Post
                    Through historical refrences prove it to me that punjab forcebily annexed sindh, balochistan and KP?
                    First of all you must know that historically NWFP and British Balochistan ( a misnomer) had never been part of the Indian subcontinent but were made part of British India after the forced Gandamak and Durand Treaties . You also must differentiate British Balochistan which had 93 percent Pashtun population from the land of Baloch which was the Qalat States Union lying outside British India. The word British India meant:
                    The expression British India shall mean all territories and places within Her Majesty's dominions which are for the time being governed by Her Majesty through the Governor-General of India, or through any Governor or other officer subordinate to the Governor-General of India. The expression India shall mean British India together with any territories of a Native Prince or Chief under the suzerainty of Her Majesty, exercised through the Governor-General of India, or through any Governor or other officer subordinate to the Governor-General of India. (52 & 53 Vict. cap. 63, sec. 18)


                    NWFP and British Balochistan were part of mainland Afghanistan. So, the inclusion of these areas in the federation of Pakistan, which had been proposed by Muslim League, carried no justification whatsoever because the people of these areas were afghans and not Indians. Besides, the British India also included territories such as Burma, The Andaman and Nicobar Islands which were not included in the same partition scheme.

                    Since British had fought three wars with Afghans, so to punish them further they arbitrarily decided to merge that large part of afghan land into the would be Pakistan rejecting any demand of self-rule( The Banu Resolution) from Pashtun (afghan) leadership. Pashtun representative government was dismissed on spurious charges and a fake referendum was staged to forcibly merge the people of NWFP in Pakistan.

                    The inclusion of British Balochistan was carried out through a fake Shahi Jirga.
                    About the occupation of Qalat States Union, the land of Baloch, I will write in another post.
                    Last edited by khyaal; 05-05-2011, 05:09 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by DaZahroJaam. View Post
                      I became stupid yesterday 25 minutes after you posted that stupid comment on zari's thread. Firtunay for you , I haven't had a chance to express my stupidity propey since then. When I do , it will be fun.. Fir me at least.

                      well you've surely outdone yourself; justifying rapes because of something the Talibs did.

                      "Talibs made us wear beards ...let's go rape women"

                      Please shut up and die.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        It wasn't intended to be nice.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Timbaktu
                          Good information Kyal bro, maybe all these facts can be recorded in a proper thread in once place to expose the historic injustices done to pashtuns.

                          @scmitar

                          maybe you meant "shut up and drive"? telling someone to die is not very nice you know.
                          Thanks a lot Timbaktu. About the military occupation of Kalat, Kharan, Makran and Lasbela I'll post it soon.

                          About the later situation which arose in East Bengal( now Bangladesh) and Sindh I'll write in separate posts. I will try to recombine them in one posts as you have suggested.
                          Last edited by khyaal; 05-05-2011, 05:31 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            [QUOTE=khyaal;430385]
                            First of all you must know that historically NWFP and British Balochistan ( a misnomer) had never been part of the Indian subcontinent but were made part of British India after the forced Gandamak and Durand Treaties .
                            You pretty much contradict yourself here. British India and Indian subcontinent are the same. I mean todays India was British India. In any case, Pashtun lands were never an accepted part of India, and was never controlled.Y

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Taliban arose due to the crimes against people. They brought security, law, and order to Afghanistan. This is same reason why their reach has spread throughout Afghanistan, and why the international community is opening up diplomatic relations with them (Turkey, India, Russia to name a few).

                              They were a response to the crimes of the warlords.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Phatans are the most dangerous ,they are the slaves paki elite.
                                they are on the trigger and they torture pukhtane and humiliate them.

                                they call Bacha Khan (Fakhre Afghan) a traitor and call any pukhtun who dont agree with them as indian raw agent or socialist communist.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X