If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The founder of Afghanistan is Nadir Shah Irani, not Ahmad Shah Abdali
Mirweis never united the Afghans. He was too busy in Western lands. What made Abdali successful was his alliance with Nadir Shah which freed resources that were used toward the conquest of India.
of course mirwais neeka managed to unite the pashtuns against the safavids
lol then why can't you name the most OBVIOUS historical source related to the topic?
Black Pakistani/Killzai EXPOSED!
i already named you 2 afghan sources now you are free to watch that and to make you realy angry i am ghilzai i have a big respect for the durranis and i dont believe the made up storys of foreigners hotaks against the durranis. this is a made up story you cant find these storys in old afghan books but in new westernized books .
i already named you 2 afghan sources now you are free to watch that and to make you realy angry i am ghilzai i have a big respect for the durranis and i dont believe the made up storys of foreigners hotaks against the durranis. this is a made up story you can find these storys in old afghan books but in new westernized books .
I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.
And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?
lol
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.
And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?
lol
i cant bring you to my village to show you my sources lol
and your name is iblis you cant be afghan at all wich afghan would call himself iblis so calm down your nipples or you make my khwate hard
I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.
And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?
lol
i named you 2 sources abdali himself and shahe kabuli is parsiwan general now its up to you to find out who the killer of the tyrann nadir afshar the crazy nutshell is.
t his parsiwan generals shahe kabuli he could also read and write.
Here's another example that you don't know what you're talking about ...Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his General, he was a Faqir, and he was actually of Indian origin, his family originated from area that is now considered Lahore.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
i named you 2 sources abdali himself and shahe kabuli is parsiwan general now its up to you to find out who the killer of the tyrann nadir afshar the crazy nutshell is.
No, Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his general ...he was a Sufi
another lie exposed. ...you're just Google searching right now but you got it wrong.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Here's another example that you don't know what you're talking about ...Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his General, he was a Faqir, and he was actually of Indian origin, his family originated from area that is now considered Lahore.
he crowened ahmad shah abdali at shere surkh and look you have no idea what you talking about he was not hindu at all i bet you dont even know where shere surkh is and it is not in india lol but you name iblis shows me you are not afghan where are you from?
i cant bring you to my village to show you my sources lol
and your name is iblis you cant be afghan at all wich afghan would call himself iblis so calm down your nipples or you make my khwate hard
You can't say your claim is in two sources and then say you heard it from your village either
Not only a contradiction, but what would a Multani village know about anything? lol
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
he crowened ahmad shah abdali at shere surkh and look you have no idea what you talking about he was not hindu at all i bet you dont even know where shere surkh is and it is not in india lol but you name iblis shows me you are not afghan where are you from?
I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir
His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir
His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!
i say he was not hindu and he was also not a faqir from india sry try again iblis where is shere surkh?
I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir
His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!
yes i would never use english sources at all always original afghan sources.
i say he was not hindu and he was also not a faqir from india sry try again iblis where is shere surkh?
I said he was a Faqir of Indian origins not that he was from India I said his family originated from Lahore....now you're just trying to smokescreen because I caught you in a lie.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Which Sher-e-Sukh, ...the one near Karz in Kandahar?
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
yes i would never use english sources at all always original afghan sources.
But you didn't even use Afghan sources, you claimed one of his sources was his general but he was a Pir who was a faqir lol
You're just posturing and everyone can see that now.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Comment