Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The founder of Afghanistan is Nadir Shah Irani, not Ahmad Shah Abdali

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by khushal View Post
    Mirweis never united the Afghans. He was too busy in Western lands. What made Abdali successful was his alliance with Nadir Shah which freed resources that were used toward the conquest of India.
    of course mirwais neeka managed to unite the pashtuns against the safavids

    abdali managed to united more than that

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
      lol then why can't you name the most OBVIOUS historical source related to the topic?

      Black Pakistani/Killzai EXPOSED!
      i already named you 2 afghan sources now you are free to watch that and to make you realy angry i am ghilzai i have a big respect for the durranis and i dont believe the made up storys of foreigners hotaks against the durranis. this is a made up story you cant find these storys in old afghan books but in new westernized books .
      Last edited by Pakhton; 12-24-2018, 01:00 AM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
        i already named you 2 afghan sources now you are free to watch that and to make you realy angry i am ghilzai i have a big respect for the durranis and i dont believe the made up storys of foreigners hotaks against the durranis. this is a made up story you can find these storys in old afghan books but in new westernized books .
        I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.

        And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?

        lol

        Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


        Originally posted by ذو الفقار
        don’t try to be smart.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
          I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.

          And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?

          lol
          i cant bring you to my village to show you my sources lol

          and your name is iblis you cant be afghan at all wich afghan would call himself iblis so calm down your nipples or you make my khwate hard

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
            I just caught you in another lie; earlier you said it was what your village said to you, Now you're saying you got it from two sources. this is a contradiction.

            And you can't even name the SINGLE most relevant book to the topic, how can you tell people what's in Afghan books when you can't name a single Afghan book?

            lol
            i named you 2 sources abdali himself and shahe kabuli is parsiwan general now its up to you to find out who the killer of the tyrann nadir afshar the crazy nutshell is.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
              t his parsiwan generals shahe kabuli he could also read and write.
              Here's another example that you don't know what you're talking about ...Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his General, he was a Faqir, and he was actually of Indian origin, his family originated from area that is now considered Lahore.

              Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


              Originally posted by ذو الفقار
              don’t try to be smart.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                i named you 2 sources abdali himself and shahe kabuli is parsiwan general now its up to you to find out who the killer of the tyrann nadir afshar the crazy nutshell is.
                No, Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his general ...he was a Sufi


                another lie exposed. ...you're just Google searching right now but you got it wrong.

                Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                don’t try to be smart.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                  Here's another example that you don't know what you're talking about ...Sayyid Sabir Shah Kabuli was not his General, he was a Faqir, and he was actually of Indian origin, his family originated from area that is now considered Lahore.
                  he crowened ahmad shah abdali at shere surkh and look you have no idea what you talking about he was not hindu at all i bet you dont even know where shere surkh is and it is not in india lol but you name iblis shows me you are not afghan where are you from?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                    i cant bring you to my village to show you my sources lol

                    and your name is iblis you cant be afghan at all wich afghan would call himself iblis so calm down your nipples or you make my khwate hard
                    You can't say your claim is in two sources and then say you heard it from your village either

                    Not only a contradiction, but what would a Multani village know about anything? lol

                    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                    don’t try to be smart.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                      he crowened ahmad shah abdali at shere surkh and look you have no idea what you talking about he was not hindu at all i bet you dont even know where shere surkh is and it is not in india lol but you name iblis shows me you are not afghan where are you from?
                      I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir

                      His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!

                      Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                      Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                      don’t try to be smart.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                        I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir

                        His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!
                        i say he was not hindu and he was also not a faqir from india sry try again iblis where is shere surkh?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                          I didn'y say he was a Hindu, I said he was Indian, he was an Indian Faqir

                          His family are Lahori .....and he was not his general. Yes he crowned Abdali, but he was not his geneeral, this demonstrates you're just looking stuff up by Google and you're using the same ANGREZ references you're telling others not to use. What a joke!
                          yes i would never use english sources at all always original afghan sources.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                            i say he was not hindu and he was also not a faqir from india sry try again iblis where is shere surkh?
                            I said he was a Faqir of Indian origins not that he was from India I said his family originated from Lahore....now you're just trying to smokescreen because I caught you in a lie.

                            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                            don’t try to be smart.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                              shere surkh?
                              Which Sher-e-Sukh, ...the one near Karz in Kandahar?

                              Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                              Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                              don’t try to be smart.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Pakhton View Post
                                yes i would never use english sources at all always original afghan sources.
                                But you didn't even use Afghan sources, you claimed one of his sources was his general but he was a Pir who was a faqir lol


                                You're just posturing and everyone can see that now.

                                Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                                Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                                don’t try to be smart.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X