Can members help me removing anti pashtun stuff from quora?

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

As for "our past" Indians can claim Afghan territory and history/past as much as Turks (Mughals) can lay claim to all of South Asia, or Mongolians all of Eurasia.
There is no "your past" outside modern state India borders.

Actually we should be claiming India as OUR Past, we ruled Large swaths of India even WITHIN the last millennium.

[16thmultiaccount]

"You" people are all over internet, Quora, etc Getting offended by facts and then opening posts on pf to complain about Indians. Bashing Indians on pf isn't sign of confidence but inferiority complex and obsession. Your "site" need to thank few Indians here who keep it active and unemployed like you engaged. There is 0 activity apart from Indian bashing.

Indic posters come here from time trolling. The bashing they get is because of trolling.

The forum has got stale due to most of posters leaving probably a result of Indics swarming the forums with their nonsense/trolling. Not saying people are unwelcome since this is an internet site free to access by anyone.

[miniskit]

Lol that original thread was several years old and someone bumpd it recently and you happened to "googled Gandhara Forum " in the same time frame?

What a coincidence. Extremely unlikely though. Lol

Googling "Gandhara Forum" still doesnt lead to this Forum, only defence.pk where bunch of Apus wet themselves over the idea of Afghanistan having anything to do with sout asia lol.

You still specifically searched Pashtunforums. Your probably an alt accounts of another Indic poster on this Forum.

As for "our past" Indians can claim Afghan territory and history/past as much as Turks (Mughals) can lay claim to all of South Asia, or Mongolians all of Eurasia.
There is no "your past" outside modern state India borders.

you sound like stupid troll, time to make 17th account. Gandhara is Indian and gandharis were brahmins and rajputs, not your backward goat ****er nomads

[16thmultiaccount]

Actually we should be claiming India as OUR Past, we ruled Large swaths of India even WITHIN the last millennium.

We could claim some parts of India. After all this Region was invaded by Indo-Europeans/Indo-Iranians. We can argue that modern Afghans are closer to ancient Indo-Iranians than modern Indians who are mostly descended from Australoid subjects. (Caste system was invented by Light skinned Invader race to keep their race pure/prohibit mixing with the darker Races although they couldnt keep pure as darker population was infintely larger)


Some Indians lay claim to Afghanistan as part of some non-existent "Greater India". The ironic thing is the term "Indian" originally did not even apply to modern Indians, but people of Sindh. This is the same to how Romans named North African lands as "Africa" but today the term "African" mostly is associated with Sub Saharan Black people.

This Gandhara BS claim is another One. Its true Afghanistan has a Buddists even Hindu pre Islamic history, but it doesnt mean anything in regards to how related ancient Afghanistans were to South Asians/Subcontinental races. Even if our ancestors were Hindu or Buddist, which some were, so what? How does this allow Indians to claim us as people, our territory, and history?

You can't claim ancient places not even inside your National borders based on some vague religious/cultural link. If people Go around claiming other lands, pretty sure there will be Chaos in the World as modern country borders are not the same as ancient ones. In ancient times there was No borders the way we see IT today.

The Indian claim is dangerous because they are painting us as invaders in lands, that these Indians have no Relations with, and that always been rightfully ours.

Gandhara was a region encompassing some parts of eastern Afghanistan/northWest Pakistan (maybe even Bamiyan in central Afghanistan). This region being Buddist/Hindu, IT means nothing in Relations to modern Indian state/people. The people that lived in ancient Afghanistan/northWest pakistan form the modern people. They have no ties with modern Indian state whatsoever.

[16thmultiaccount]

you sound like stupid troll, time to make 17th account. Gandhara is Indian and gandharis were brahmins and rajputs, not your backward goat ****er nomads

Easy Photoshop. Googling "Gandhara Forum" wont Link you to this site without adding Pashtunforums. Lol.

This idiot is ass tor khar or other usee Indic boss.

You have been outed Gandu troll. Lol

[maneatinglizard]

you sound like stupid troll, time to make 17th account. Gandhara is Indian and gandharis were brahmins and rajputs, not your backward goat ****er nomads

1. Who searches for something as specific as "gandhara forums"?
2. If the Gandharans were rajputs, and rajputs are a mighty race of invincible warriors as you've claimed, then how were they so utterly defeated that there's no trace of them left in the area?
3. You probably shouldn't level bestiality insults at us when last I checked it was your ancestors that depicted bestiality on their temples of all places.
4. If we're backward goat-loving nomads, why do you consider us your natural allies? And what does it say about you that a bunch of backward goat-loving nomads still see you as a pathetic joke?

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

We could claim some parts of India. After all this Region was invaded by Indo-Europeans/Indo-Iranians. We can argue that modern Afghans are closer to ancient Indo-Iranians than modern Indians who are mostly descended from Australoid subjects. (Caste system was invented by Light skinned Invader race to keep their race pure/prohibit mixing with the darker Races although they couldnt keep pure as darker population was infintely larger)


Some Indians lay claim to Afghanistan as part of some non-existent "Greater India". The ironic thing is the term "Indian" originally did not even apply to modern Indians, but people of Sindh. This is the same to how Romans named North African lands as "Africa" but today the term "African" mostly is associated with Sub Saharan Black people.

This Gandhara BS claim is another One. Its true Afghanistan has a Buddists even Hindu pre Islamic history, but it doesnt mean anything in regards to how related ancient Afghanistans were to South Asians/Subcontinental races. Even if our ancestors were Hindu or Buddist, which some were, so what? How does this allow Indians to claim us as people, our territory, and history?

You can't claim ancient places not even inside your National borders based on some vague religious/cultural link. If people Go around claiming other lands, pretty sure there will be Chaos in the World as modern country borders are not the same as ancient ones. In ancient times there was No borders the way we see IT today.

The Indian claim is dangerous because they are painting us as invaders in lands, that these Indians have no Relations with, and that always been rightfully ours.

Gandhara was a region encompassing some parts of eastern Afghanistan/northWest Pakistan (maybe even Bamiyan in central Afghanistan). This region being Buddist/Hindu, IT means nothing in Relations to modern Indian state/people. The people that lived in ancient Afghanistan/northWest pakistan form the modern people. They have no ties with modern Indian state whatsoever.

Exactly Indian refers to people who originated in the area beyond river Sindh.


In Ancient Times, what now constitutes modern India were different kingdoms and principalities that were warring against each other. There was no unified concept of India. What Miniskit is arguing is anachronistic nonsense.

Even The Vedic religion itself didn't originate in India. Did you know the Aryans used to eat beef and hunted animals? These are abhored in modern Hindu doctrine. Vegetarianism was a residue of the ancient Dravidian religions. What Indians believe in today is a mish mash of Aryan invader religion and their original Dravidian-Australoid past.

What existed in Afghanistan was probably something more resembling the original religion of the Aryans of Central Asia, and they ate meat and hunted animals.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

you sound like stupid troll, time to make 17th account. Gandhara is Indian and gandharis were brahmins and rajputs, not your backward goat ****er nomads

That's so funny because all the archaeological evidence shows that bestiality has been a cultural pastime of your people for centuries.

you must be really embarrassed now aren't you dot-head? Indics always project their defects on others.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

Easy Photoshop. Googling "Gandhara Forum" wont Link you to this site without adding Pashtunforums. Lol.

This idiot is ass tor khar or other usee Indic boss.

You have been outed Gandu troll. Lol

yep, this is what I see on my end. This guy is FULL OF Dhal

[miniskit]

Easy Photoshop. Googling "Gandhara Forum" wont Link you to this site without adding Pashtunforums. Lol.

This idiot is ass tor khar or other usee Indic boss.

You have been outed Gandu troll. Lol

You are uneducated person, google doesn't need specific mention of pf to show. Google about how search engine work. Look at other forums which show up, I didn't mention any of them.

[miniskit]

We could claim some parts of India. After all this Region was invaded by Indo-Europeans/Indo-Iranians. We can argue that modern Afghans are closer to ancient Indo-Iranians than modern Indians who are mostly descended from Australoid subjects. (Caste system was invented by Light skinned Invader race to keep their race pure/prohibit mixing with the darker Races although they couldnt keep pure as darker population was infintely larger)


Some Indians lay claim to Afghanistan as part of some non-existent "Greater India". The ironic thing is the term "Indian" originally did not even apply to modern Indians, but people of Sindh. This is the same to how Romans named North African lands as "Africa" but today the term "African" mostly is associated with Sub Saharan Black people.

This Gandhara BS claim is another One. Its true Afghanistan has a Buddists even Hindu pre Islamic history, but it doesnt mean anything in regards to how related ancient Afghanistans were to South Asians/Subcontinental races. Even if our ancestors were Hindu or Buddist, which some were, so what? How does this allow Indians to claim us as people, our territory, and history?

You can't claim ancient places not even inside your National borders based on some vague religious/cultural link. If people Go around claiming other lands, pretty sure there will be Chaos in the World as modern country borders are not the same as ancient ones. In ancient times there was No borders the way we see IT today.

The Indian claim is dangerous because they are painting us as invaders in lands, that these Indians have no Relations with, and that always been rightfully ours.

Gandhara was a region encompassing some parts of eastern Afghanistan/northWest Pakistan (maybe even Bamiyan in central Afghanistan). This region being Buddist/Hindu, IT means nothing in Relations to modern Indian state/people. The people that lived in ancient Afghanistan/northWest pakistan form the modern people. They have no ties with modern Indian state whatsoever.

Afghans are east iranic nomads while Gandharis were Indians. We still follow same culture and speak same language. You on the other hand were forced by arabs who are semetic. Everything about you and your people is semetic with little indo-european left in few loan words. Even when few afghan nomads migrated to India, they became Indians without any trace of their primitive nomadic culture but they still remained muslims and now live like pariahs and dalits.

Read history, Hinduism and Bhudism origin lies in north central India now known as UP, Bihar and Delhi.

A ******* can't claim ownership over legitimate son, you are not even ******* but completely different people. based on common linguistic family you should claim Persian civilisation but we both know how proper iranics/Persians treat you.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

You are uneducated person, google doesn't need specific mention of pf to show. Google about how search engine work. Look at other forums which show up, I didn't mention any of them.

That's not what he's saying; he's saying the algorithm won't specifically show Pashtunforums high on the list without it being specifically mentioned. The others show up because they rank higher. Thus it seems the best way to get it show up higher in the algorithm is to specifically search it.

[16thmultiaccount]

That's so funny because all the archaeological evidence shows that bestiality has been a cultural pastime of your people for centuries.

you must be really embarrassed now aren't you dot-head? Indics always project their defects on others.

Old habbits die hard:

[Traveller]

Afghans are east iranic nomads while Gandharis were Indians. We still follow same culture and speak same language. You on the other hand were forced by arabs who are semetic. Everything about you and your people is semetic with little indo-european left in few loan words. Even when few afghan nomads migrated to India, they became Indians without any trace of their primitive nomadic culture but they still remained muslims and now live like pariahs and dalits.

Read history, Hinduism and Bhudism origin lies in north central India now known as UP, Bihar and Delhi.

A ******* can't claim ownership over legitimate son, you are not even ******* but completely different people. based on common linguistic family you should claim Persian civilisation but we both know how proper iranics/Persians treat you.

Gamdhari is an extinct language. Unless you're some really exceptional person you probably don't speak it.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

they became Indians without any trace of their primitive nomadic culture but they still remained muslims and now live like pariahs and dalits.

I guess you made the movie Khuda Gawah to fawn over our culture and how badly you wish you were us because you see us as pariahs and dalits too lol

Read history, Hinduism and Bhudism origin lies in north central India now known as UP, Bihar and Delhi.

Yes Hinduism began in India; the original religion of the Aryans, by the primitive nomadic people who conquered you so many times over the centuries.

A ******* can't claim ownership over legitimate son, you are not even ******* but completely different people. based on common linguistic family you should claim Persian civilisation but we both know how proper iranics/Persians treat you.

Write a whole paragraph on your own in Gandhari