Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Requesting member Catya Sher

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • :::Summery of this thread:::


    Wrayun: Catya, are you a Muslim or a Pukhtoon, you seem to take concrete stance on certain political, religious, and cultural positions in regards to both of the subjects.

    Catya: YOU BULLY ME! I SAID STAY AWAY FROM ME!

    Wrayun: No, it was I, that requested you to not address me.

    Catya: YOU BULLY ME! GO READ MY 1600 POSTS!

    Catya Suppoters: CATYA GOOD! BAGYAM THIS! TORAMANA THAT! OSHO THIS!

    Wrayun: What do they have to do with this?

    Catya Supporters: ARE YOU MUSLIM? ARE YOU PUKHTOON? WHERE YOUR LOYALTY?

    Wrayun: I am Muslim, I am Pukhtoon, and my loyalty is with Pukhtoons!

    Catya Supporters: BUT BAYGHAM THIS! TORAMANA THAT! OSHO THIS! ARGGGGHHH!

    Wrayun: What do they have to do with this?

    Catya Supporters: YOU SUPPORT THEM! YOU ARE ONE OF THEM! ARGGGGGHHHH!

    Wrayun: No I'm not, I in fact debated them vigriously, far more than any "authentic" Muslim.

    Catya Supporters: YOU ARE DOING TAQQIYA! YOU ARE CRYTO-SECULAR! YOU ARE CLOSET ATHEIST! ARGGGGGHHHH!! YOU BRAINWASH!!!! ARRGGHHHHHH!!! COME FIGHT ME IN MECCA!!!!!!!!!!! I KILL YOU!!!! ARRGGGHHHH!!!!



    Comment


    • Originally posted by unknownprince
      I understand what Fahd is saying to you. Didn't you say once that it is considered cool to have children out of wedlock?

      Fahd makes more sense than you.

      Your "no black, no white, all gray" attitude doesn't lend an edge to really anything you say. While defending atheists who mock the Prophet(pbuh), what type of middle ground do you walk on??

      First, I request that you (as a moderator) deny this blasphemy here before focusing on other issues.

      Regards



      Bring your evidence, or forever hold your breath. Teeng sha, back your shyt up.

      Comment


      • Next up, Unknownprince.

        Let's see what you have here.

        You said,

        Originally posted by unknownprince
        , defends atheists who mock Islam.
        Do you mind showing me a single post where he has participated in the mocking of Islam? Show me 1 post where has badmouthed Islam. To make your search query more easier, show me where he has 'defended' atheists in a thread where they were mocking Islam.

        The above is a claim commonly made by PF Bijhligar. Everytime PF Bijhligar is asked to provide evidence, he hibernates. I hope you don't follow suit.
        Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

        A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

        For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


        The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

        -Ferishta, 1560–1620

        Comment


        • Originally posted by unknownprince
          stand your ground. There is no need to apologize. He makes fun of you, mocks you, defends atheists who mock Islam.
          PROVE IT, PROVE IT, PROVE IT PROVE IT PROVE IT!

          My God, Catya is so selfish, her little kids are making up lies to defend her. While she hides, and doesn't intervene, allowing these imbeciles to degrade themselves.

          How cute.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by unknownprince
            I am not talking about Wrayun. I am talking about Baygham.

            Wrayun defends Baygham who happens to mock Islam frequently.

            Am I somehow wrong?
            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



            Prove it, show me where I defended Baygham, who mocks Islam? Point to a thread, a post whatever you can find.

            On the contrary, there are plenty of posts and threads where I have refuted Baygham extensively, to the point where he, just like you brain dead zombies, have brought my family into the discourse, calling me a pimp.

            Prove it. Ghariat okkaaa, naaar sha! Maidan preg nade.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by unknownprince
              i can't search it, search does not go back that far.

              you were speaking to Talal or something way back in Sept or Oct

              What you said was that people are having children out of wedlock nowadays. That it is considered normal. People are not getting married anymore-- something like that
              HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH


              sharam yu shay da...do you have any? search goes all the way back. I can help you with the search. You can find every single one of my post, all you have to do click on my name, view my profile, click on the ALL POSTS BY USER.

              No excuses, don't be a coward. Back your stuff up man. Save your face, or now loose it in front of everyone.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by unknownprince
                Please read that carefully Admin Khan.
                I read what you wrote. On the contrary, if you read what I wrote, I asked you for proof. I am politely asking you for proof of Wrayun defending Baygham while he is insulting Islam. Am I perhaps asking for too much? You do know that lying against a Muslim is a serious sin in Islam, right? You have made a claim against Wrayun and now you have 3 options.

                A)You can apologize to Wrayun for the horrible claim you made.
                B)You can show us proof for your claims.
                C)You can watch Nickelodeon and act like you never said what you did.
                Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                Comment


                • Originally posted by unknownprince
                  Please read that carefully Admin Khan.
                  He said give evidence, he said prove it, he didn't say write a line of unsubstantiated text.

                  You need to go read very carefully as to what Admin Khan said.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by unknownprince
                    Please read that carefully Admin Khan.
                    Zahir,
                    Let's not begin a verbal Attan here.

                    I said,

                    Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
                    I read what you wrote. On the contrary, if you read what I wrote, I asked you for proof. I am politely asking you for proof of Wrayun defending Baygham while he is insulting Islam. Am I perhaps asking for too much? You do know that lying against a Muslim is a serious sin in Islam, right? You have made a claim against Wrayun and now you have 3 options.

                    A)You can apologize to Wrayun for the horrible claim you made.
                    B)You can show us proof for your claims.
                    C)You can watch Nickelodeon and act like you never said anything
                    I will patiently wait for your response.
                    Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                    A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                    For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                    The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                    -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                    Comment


                    • Most of Wrayun's post is debating with Baygham, MI6, and Toramana. Am not defending him in no way. But stats are stats

                      but,

                      Where's Catya?
                      Catya, Cherta di?
                      Catya, Kahan hai?
                      Catya, Guza ast?
                      Catya, dondé esta?

                      Seriously why doesn't she come, and put a stop to this?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by unknownprince
                        Im serious, it does not go all the way back.

                        Do you deny not saying that people have children of of wedlock nowadays???

                        I remember that.

                        Yes or no. Did you say that???
                        Let's agree that he said what you just said. What is wrong with such a general statement? It is true, people nowadays are having children without being married to their partner. The above is very true in the USA. In fact, if Wrayun said the above[which we assume he did]I agree with him. I also think that nowadays, in the USA, some girls are getting pregnant at the age of 15 and having children. And the sure as hell are not married. In fact, usually when the male finds out his girl is pregnant, he runs away and leaves the poor teenager all alone with the child. To strenghten my argument, I will give you one quick example. Read this article carefully. This is just a taste of the issue that you brought up.
                        Memphis, Tennessee– About 90 students at Frayser High School are either pregnant, or have been recently. According to one group tracking the numbers, Frayser has the highest teen pregnancy ra…
                        Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                        A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                        For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                        The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                        -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by unknownprince
                          Im serious, it does not go all the way back.

                          Do you deny not saying that people have children of of wedlock nowadays???

                          I remember that.

                          Yes or no. Did you say that???
                          You know unknownprince, there is a reason why this thread is being continued right? I'll help you out, the more you open your mouth, the more you get trashed and exposed.

                          You asked Fahd earlier not to apologize, just a few posts above you are apologizing your self. You are a sad case, my sorry little friend.

                          I never endorsed children, or relationships out of wedlock. And I have addressed Toramana, Baygham, more than Maseed and Sangar combined.











                          and there are plenty of more.


                          I don't blame you. You, Fahd, GOE, are kids, mislead, and encouraged by this non-Pukhtoon, non-Muslim Catya. This was my concern, and my point. I really feel sorry for you guys, you are so mislead, and misinformed, and she continues to fan your ignorance.

                          There is a long Pukhto matal, proverb, that goes that a mother supported her son so much, at the expense of a father son relationship, that her son became a criminal. Once in jail he asked for his mother. When the mother came to see him, he smiled and then stabbed her to death. The guards asked him why he killed his mother, the lady who "cared" for him so much. He replied: If she would have allowed my father to be the father he should have been, I wouldn't be on death row.

                          She is poison kid.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by unknownprince
                            Okay, let me be clear, This is respectfully directed at you Admin Khan, Wrayun, BLS, tor_khan, Mayana

                            When someone whoever it is insults Islam, and mocks Islam, and also makes fun of Afghans, I notice that the "they have a right to say it" tone is taken.

                            Silence is license for the vicious, is it not? When Jews were made fun of in Germany via cartoons, people never said anything??

                            So silence is defending. People should not have any right to mock Islam.

                            And, telling me "when did you report it?" well that does not count.

                            Because suddenly when I used the words "secular pimps," it is considered a crime???

                            So NO, I am sticking to my guns. Until I see more admonishment of repeat mockers of Islam (as Arab culture), you guys are not defending Islam.

                            I mean this without an offensive tone.
                            Wooh, don't go off in a cosine. Answer what I politely asked you. We can discuss the aforementioned at another given time. You don't go to court and begin talking about what you ate for dinner at your Honeymoon. I asked you a question, and I expect you to be intellectually honest and answer it. You made some claims, and I would like to see you either defend them, or apologize to Wrayun for making them. I think I gave you 3 options, lets see what you choose. We can discuss anything you want after we finish this one court case.
                            Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                            A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                            For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                            The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                            -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by unknownprince
                              Okay, let me be clear, This is respectfully directed at you Admin Khan, Wrayun, BLS, tor_khan, Mayana

                              When someone whoever it is insults Islam, and mocks Islam, and also makes fun of Afghans, I notice that the "they have a right to say it" tone is taken.

                              Silence is license for the vicious, is it not? When Jews were made fun of in Germany via cartoons, people never said anything??

                              So silence is defending. People should not have any right to mock Islam.

                              And, telling me "when did you report it?" well that does not count.

                              Because suddenly when I used the words "secular pimps," it is considered a crime???

                              So NO, I am sticking to my guns. Until I see more admonishment of repeat mockers of Islam (as Arab culture), you guys are not defending Islam.

                              I mean this without an offensive tone.

                              There is a considerable careless attitude taken in defending Islam.
                              You are beating a dead horse. These atheists that you talk about, the ones that mock or insult Islam, have been addressed countless times. This accusation of yours is nothing new. On the contrary, many of the atheists, and mockers of Islam, no longer participate on this platform, they left the site in protest, because they believe the Administration is "ARAB SENSITIVE", and "Islamic".

                              All your doing is making this worse for your own positions, or "guns".

                              A little evidence to back your claims would be appreciated.

                              Comment


                              • Unknown prince
                                Just stop. Your sticking up to a mysterio, and going after a Muslim. Tell your boy/girl/it, to just answer the damn question, so we all could move along, and the thread to get locked.


                                Theirs only two members here who insult Islam, at times. Cmon

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X