Originally posted by Samandri
View Post
Greek doesn't have sh, but many languages don't have kh. If the sh was a factor, it would logically imply that s would've been used instead. Why use k?
As far as "Pakhtas" (as well as related Bhalanases, Vishanins, Alinas, and Sivas) are concerned , they are mentioned in Riveda which was written in 1500 B.C and is mythological and legendary stuff.
The Arachosia of Pactyans corresponds to greater Kandahar and Sulieman mountains , and all of these areas are soft dialect speakers. Its very noticeable that hard dialect of Pashto is spoken only in those areas which have been colonized by Pashtuns relatively recently.
Also, what they speak today is not relevant. We're looking for original. Farsi has transformed over time.
Kabul, Nangarhar, Kunar, Laghman, Bajaur, Mohamnd and upper KPK were colonized by existing Pashtun tribes in 15th and 16th century, and all of these tribes had migrated from Loy Kandahar and Tarnak region where soft dialect of Pashto is spoken. Even Afridis are not ancient inhabitants of Khyber agency, they settled there in Pir Roshan times, while Shinwaris migrated from Sulimena mountains and is actually a branch of Kasi tribe (who lives in Quetta)...the Safis of upper FATA and North-eastern Afghanistan is a branch of Panni tribe of Balochistan.
That's interesting, but it's just talking about the differences in the dialects. Not proving much. The author says it's got indo aryan influence, but as native speakers, we can make our own inference. What indo aryan influence brought the hard dialect? Find anything that sounds similar in the region.


Comment