Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtun woman, a challenge to the conscience of the Humanity and human rights groups.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The continued abuse of the Pashtun woman

    They all suffer in silence, but compared to the rest of Pakistan, women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) suffer domestic violence in greater proportions. While terror-stricken Pakistan is focused on North Waziristan for a breakthrough with the violence sponsoring Taliban, domestic violence against women in general, and Pashtun women in particular, has been pushed on the backburner. A recent survey though exposes the extent of widespread domestic violence against women in Pakistan. Equally disturbing is the finding that Pashtun women are much more likely to be subjected to such violence than other women in Pakistan.
    The violence-stricken KPK has been in the crosshairs of law enforcement agencies, policy makers, international NGOs, and other global religo-militant franchises. The lack of civilian oversight and control over the past six decades in the adjoining tribal areas of KPK has perpetuated a culture where weapons and gore have unnecessarily been glorified. Some weapon-friendly members of the community have been the preferred insurgents for the establishment for cross-border intrigues since 1948. While the State may have achieved short-term gains by sustaining a heightened sense of militancy among Pashtuns in KPK, however, this has come at great cost to the entire nation. But more importantly, the frequent victims of violence are the women in KPK, and in Balochistan, whose cries for help are muffled in the noise from the war on terror.
    The recently released findings from the 2012-13 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey*, which was conducted by various government agencies and funded by the USAID, sheds light on the living conditions of ever-married women between the ages of 15 and 49. The survey, a third of its kind in Pakistan, interviewed 13,558 women from a random and nationally representative sample of 14,000 households. A relatively smaller sample of ever-married men between the ages of 15 and 49 were also interviewed. The survey also collected information from a subsample of 3,687 women about domestic violence, which included several manifestation of physical aggression including “hitting, kicking, biting, shoving, restraining, slapping, or throwing objects” and other “sexual and emotional abuse, controlling or domineering behaviours, intimidation, stalking, and passive or covert abuse.” The survey paints a dismal picture of women’s welfare across Pakistan, but more so of the women in KPK and Balochistan.
    According to the survey, one in five ever-married women aged between 15 and 49 years experienced physical violence in the 12 months prior to the survey. In addition, one in three women aged between 15 and 49 years suffered emotional or physical abuse from their husbands in the 12 months prior to the survey, 35 per cent of whom reported physical scarring. It gets worse. One in 10 women was subjected to violence while being pregnant. And worse of all, most women suffer in silence. The survey revealed that 52 per cent of women subjected to violence never sought help or shared their plight with others.
    The differences in the prevalence of domestic violence across Pakistan are startling. Almost 59 per cent of rural women in KPK reported being subjected to physical abuse since they turned 15. The urban women in Sindh at 21 per cent were the least exposed to domestic violence. The sample size from Gilgit-Baltistan was too small for comparison with the rest of Pakistan.
    One in 10 rural women in KPK and Balochistan each routinely experienced domestic physical violence compared to only 5 per cent rural women in Punjab and 1.5 per cent rural women in Sindh. Divorced, widowed or separated women were two-times more likely to report frequent domestic violence than married women. Does education help? In fact, it did. Educated women were far less likely to report domestic violence than uneducated women. But here is a caveat. It may be true that educated women were less likely to be subjected to domestic violence, but it could also be true that out of embarrassment they were less likely to report abuse.


    -Source: 2012-13 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey.

    Unlike education, income suggested a non-linear association with domestic violence. Women belonging to middle classes were more likely to report domestic violence than women from low-income or affluent households. Women in the second income quintile were three-times more likely to report frequent domestic violence than those belonging to the lowest income quintile. As expected, women in the highest income quintile were the least likely to report domestic violence.
    The physical violence against women by their spouses is often a result of various deep-rooted psychological and other behavioural challenges. Again, such troubling behaviours are more prevalent among men in KPK and Balochistan than in other parts of Pakistan. For instance, one in two women in KPK reported that their husbands would get angry or jealous if the women were to speak with other men. Only one in five women in Punjab and Sindh reported the same. Whereas 14 per cent of women in Punjab reported that their husbands wanted to keep track of them at all times, 30 per cent women in KPK and 32 per cent in Balochistan reported the same. Again, highly educated or wealthy women were the least likely to report controlling or insecure husbands.
    Education for men was more instrumental where the level of violence reported by wives declined with the level of education of their husbands. One in three women married to illiterate men reported physical violence compared to 16 per cent of those married to men educated beyond secondary levels. However, women whose husbands were better educated were more likely to report physical violence than women whose education was similar to that of their husbands.

    Comment


    • These things happen in 21st century



      SHANGLA: A jirga forced two young girls into marriage under the custom of swara in Chakesar, Shangla after which police arrested 19 accused and filed a case against 28 people on Monday.

      According to Chakesar police official Anwar Muhammad, on May 30 Bakht Ali, a resident of Taloon, and Shahnaz Bibi, daughter of Ghulam Haider, ran away together. After they allegedly eloped, a grand jirga comprising 28 people, including local religious clerics, decided to give Bakht’s two nieces in swara to Haider’s family.

      On Monday, the jirga handed over six-year-old Noor Jehan and her five-year-old sister Sadia, daughters of Bakht’s brother Muhammad Ali, to Haider’s family, added the official. The two minor girls were made to enter into a nikkah with Tariq Ali, 9, and Zakirullah, 11.
      After the nikkah ceremony, heavy contingents of police rushed to the spot and arrested 19, including the cleric. Nine others were able to escape from the scene, said Muhammad.

      He said both girls were recovered and a case has been filed against 28 people. The police are raiding various areas to arrest the remaining culprits.

      Comment


      • In KP's Karak region: Women ‘banned’ from going out without male company

        KARAK: Local ulema and elders ‘banned’ here on Tuesday movement of young women outside their homes without the company of male relatives and said the violators would be fined and socially boycotted.

        A decision to this effect was taken at a meeting of the Gurguri Islahi Tanzeem chaired by its former president Nasrullah Khan. Local ulema, elders and members of the committee were in attendance.

        The participants expressed concern over increasing drug addiction among youth and said that there would be complete ban on sale of drugs in the area. The meeting warned the drug traffickers to quit the illegal business or face dire consequences.

        On the occasion, two drug sellers decided to quit the illegal and unethical business. The participants extended support to the committee’s struggle for drug-free society.

        The meeting also decided that in case of theft in the area the committee would suggest severe punishment and fine for thieves. It was also decided that the affected family would be compensated by the relatives of thieves.

        The participants demanded of the police and district administration to extend support to the committee for implementing its decisions.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Badlun View Post
          In KP's Karak region: Women ‘banned’ from going out without male company

          KARAK: Local ulema and elders ‘banned’ here on Tuesday movement of young women outside their homes without the company of male relatives and said the violators would be fined and socially boycotted.

          A decision to this effect was taken at a meeting of the Gurguri Islahi Tanzeem chaired by its former president Nasrullah Khan. Local ulema, elders and members of the committee were in attendance.

          The participants expressed concern over increasing drug addiction among youth and said that there would be complete ban on sale of drugs in the area. The meeting warned the drug traffickers to quit the illegal business or face dire consequences.

          On the occasion, two drug sellers decided to quit the illegal and unethical business. The participants extended support to the committee’s struggle for drug-free society.

          The meeting also decided that in case of theft in the area the committee would suggest severe punishment and fine for thieves. It was also decided that the affected family would be compensated by the relatives of thieves.

          The participants demanded of the police and district administration to extend support to the committee for implementing its decisions.

          http://www.dawn.com/news/1123633/in-...t-male-company
          Similar was done in Bannu perhaps around 2004-05(I don't exactly remember the year) and this was effective for almost an year or more by zopar jamaat mala but later the govt interfered and the ban was lifted

          Many widow and related women had alot of problems with this.Hell even Women were banned from going for work(As in the village for grass or related activities including old women)
          "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Badlun View Post
            University of Michigan Population Studies Center recently published a survey in which it asked respondents from Muslim countries to choose the most appropriate apparel for women.

            The survey, which was conducted between 2011 and 2013, covered seven countries: Tunisia, Pakistani, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

            The section devoted to gender issues included a question on how women should dress in public. Respondents were shown six head shots which showed women wearing a shuttlecock burka, a niqab, different forms of headscarves and one without any head covering.

            Of the 3,523 Pakistanis surveyed in the report, 32% favoured a niqab (photo 2). The abaya (photo 3) was the second most popular category with 31% of people voting for it. In comparison, only 3% of respondents voted for the shuttlecock burka and only 2% for the woman shown without a veil or scarf. 51% of the Pakistani respondents were male.

            For most countries, the fourth image, which shows a woman wearing a headscarf, was deemed to be the most appropriate but in Lebanon the majority of respondents – nearly 50% – voted for the sixth image which shows a woman without any veil or scarf.
            Dress as they please

            When asked whether women should be allowed to dress as they please, nearly half the respondents from Tunisia, Lebanon and Turkey – if not more – voted in favour. However only 22% of Pakistanis said women should be able to dress as they wish, followed by Egypt at 14%.

            Gender issues
            The survey also asked respondents if women should always be expected to obey their husbands. 38% of Lebanese respondents disagreed with the statement whereas only 8% of Pakistani voted against it.
            Also, when asked about the importance of love as basis for marriage, only 7% of Pakistanis said it was important.

            In most of the surveys on women and gender, Pakistani respondents voted conservatively but when asked whether men make better political leaders than women, 29% of Pakistanis disagreed. In comparison, only 17% of Egyptians, 21% of Saudis and 28% of Iraqis disagreed that men make better political leaders than women.

            32% of Pakistanis say niqab most appropriate dress for women: survey – The Express Tribune

            Prior to 80's Pakistani society was more liberal than majority of the countries in the muslim world but a decade of Zia rule changed everything and made the youth extremist including the army recruit of 80's.

            Dawn does has some quality journalists

            A Good read from Also Pakistan by NFP

            "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

            Comment


            • Is morality determined by the length of a woman’s blouse?

              Excellent piece of writing

              Over time I have noticed a common trend on Pakistani Facebook pages, especially those of designers and celebrities: crude, caustic and downright hateful slandering of celebrities.

              I recently stumbled upon a picture of Humaima Malick looking gorgeous in an elegant Élan ensemble and all I could think of was the talent and beauty that exists in our country. But then I read the bitterest of verbal abuses on the picture, which included:

              “She is lookin’ dumb and her makeup is damn worst”

              “Kitni ugly hai pata nai kyun uthaya hua hai isko”

              “This is behayaee and immoral behaviour”
              Apparently, showing inches of your midriff is “immoral” and a bigger issue than dishonesty, breach of rights, self-righteousness and hatred. If a dress were to simply determine how decent or virtuous a person was then one wouldn’t need to develop any virtue at all.

              A woman in a scarf is seen as pious and one in a western attire as corrupt; a baseless prejudice that has people believing that morality lies in the length of a woman’s blouse.

              Funnily, all of these comments came from women using pseudonyms and pictures of objects or animals in their display pictures. It became apparent that these women were living highly controlled and over-protected lives. Sadly, women living under the strict patriarchal control of their husbands, fathers or brothers are not allowed to wear what they want, go where they want, work where they want and sometimes even marry who they want. Women who demand their basic rights are subjected to abuse and violence; curbing their chances to grow, thrive and survive.

              This points to the root issue of the breach of basic human liberties, including self-expression and living in a manner one pleases. Living in the 21st century, where the world is witnessing the discoveries of the first draft of the human genome, Shinya Yamanaka’s induced pluripotent stem cells, Higgs boson at CERN and Photonic molecules at MIT, we are stuck judging women for their choices in dressing.

              It is unfortunate because, instead of respecting basic rights, they conveniently bash those who choose to live uninhibited lives. How can women be empowered when the image of an empowered woman becomes a subject to hate? When will women realise that they can only grow if they allow other women to freely express themselves?

              Our people need to realise that the country can only progress culturally if we reassess our standards of morality and respect, and appreciate everyone in the same manner. Making an issue out of something so trivial and labelling it immoral would not only disempower women but the entire generations to follow.

              Comment


              • Look at this barbarism aka Shariat

                Comment

                Working...
                X