Is Pakistan disintegrating?

[abdul]

pakistan is filled with corruption the only reason why it hasn't been disintegrated (as some people would say) is because of afghanistan
some people probably ask me why because of afghanistan?

its because halve of pakistan (or more) is originally afghan territory it was taken by the brits by cheating the king of afghanistan at that time
if that part of afghanistan wasn't given to pakistan it would have been a small country and easily overtaken by the indian army

YouTube - Afghans In History Episode Thirteen - The Durrand Line

in the last 30 years pakistan has received money from the afghanistan wars

during the sovjet afghan war pakistan received money (from the u.s , u.k and Islamic country's ) to train mujahideen

during the afghan civil war pakistan received money (from the taliban , al qaida and Islamic country/organisations that supported ) to train taliban

during this war pakistan is receiving to train the the taliban (from al qaida and their ally's) and to fight against the taliban (from u.s and its ally's)

if the wars in afghanistan would to stop it would lose a lot money and become very weak.

[khushal]

@abdul
The only reason Pakistan has not disintegrated is because it was a usefull proxy against the socialist soviets in the cold war. Its usefullness to the west I beleive has expired. The west has new plans to utilize the region for its interests.

[abdul]

@abdul
The only reason Pakistan has not disintegrated is because it was a usefull proxy against the socialist soviets in the cold war. Its usefullness to the west I beleive has expired. The west has new plans to utilize the region for its interests.

thats is what i said meant in my second part of the message

[amna.]

@Khushal,
Pakistan will continue serving as a proxy for American interests since the US needs someone to follow it's orders against it's economic rival China and it's potential rival India.


This is exactly what the USA did to Germany.

[Espresso]

Clearly a failed response warrants such a reply.



Individual pictures of peasant labourers are not important.

There's some Indianness in the Punjab and Sindh. There also is some non Indianness. They're simply Punjabi or Sindhi, not Indian which is too broad a term.

The Punjabis have a set look which is somewhere in between the Pashtun and the Uttar Pradesh look.



India begins at the Indo=Pak border.

The Indic people is a linguistical grouping and means nothing.



Such stupidity I've only met before in Indian posters.

The IVC people did not uproot themselves and leave the Indus Valley.

They remained firmly where they were, though some wandered off into India.

What happened was a cultural shift.



If I showed you some light skinned Punjabis, then according to your logic this would be a good representation of Punjabi people.

I'm not wasting time on looking at silly little pictures that you pick to suit your argument.



It is very easy to claim Pashtunness on the internet.

It is silly chest-beating like a true ape.

They are not Hindu temples.

I can see why you think they are. Your knowledge is weak. It is spoonfed from sites that you have interpreted from an Indian mindset, thinking that the IVC people uprooted themselves like some biblical event.

Similarly your poor interpretation causes you to believe these are Hindu temples. It is simply wishful thinking and not more. I could perhaps tell you what they really are, I suppose.

tell you what READ AGAIN: you are a rude and insensitive prudish person
haven't you learned of how to reply to your senior's & for heaven's sake man dont you ever get tired of all this race thing you post all the time to be honest
READ AGAIN: quite simply Pathetic

[pukhtana]

Pakistan is already a failed state. It hasn't disintegrated due to American interests with them. Pakistanis are a toy for Americans.

[Shayesta]

What's the deal with rats by you Dravidics all the time?

What's the deal with Indian-Afghan matter by you Pakistanis all the time?

Rats is not a Pakistani thing. I have no idea why you're so obsessed by it.

Nor is Indian-Afghan matter any Pakistani thing, I don't know why you are so obsessed with it?

There is nothing wrong with being Pakistani, I have no idea why you believe there is.

There is nothing with Afghans-Indians forming an alliance, I have got no idea why you Pakistanis think there is?

the facts are these.
The UN passed a binding resolution that a plebiscite is to be held and the people of Kashmir will decide who they want to join, India or Pakistan.

Or the facts are these; You stop interfering with Kashmir, India will stop it's army operations in Kashmir, death-toll will decrease rapidly.

India prevented the plebiscite from occurring, and forcibly made the Kashmiris part of their Constitution.

Does Pakistan care about the fact Kashmir is forcibly a part of India? Or about the fact it wants to weaken it's enemy?

There is no fighting on the Pakistani side of Kashmir.

And this again proves India isn't as obsessed by Pakistani side of Kashmir as is Pakistan by the other side. Right?

The fighting is all on the Indian side of Kashmir because that is where the resentment is.

Plus where Pakistani interferences are; Afghans already got a taste on it.

don't talk about disintegration of Pakistan in this forum... most of the KP pashtoons are die hard Pakistanis... u will cause them emotional trauma! lol

Already a name came up to me, LOL. :$