Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vladimir Putin saves the world?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vladimir Putin saves the world?

    Tough Russian leader Vladimir Putin:













    vs Barry Soetro a.k.a. Barack Obama








    Unconfirmed reports are coming in from Lebanon that Russia shot down the two American missiles on 3rd of September. Western media claim that it was in fact Israel that shot them down.

    Al-Manar refer to pro-leftist As-Safir newspaper in Lebanon that it was in fact Russia that shot down the US Aim-Sparrow missiles:





    Truth of US-Russia Confrontation




    Daoud Rammal – As-Safir



    Aggression was over the Moment those Two Missiles were Fired



    A well informed diplomatic source told As-Safir newspaper that “the US war on Syria had started and ended the moment those two ballistic missiles were fired, leaving inconsistent information, as Israel denied and Russia confirmed, until an Israeli statement was issued indicating they were fired in the context of an Israeli-US joint drill and fell in the sea, and that they were not related to the Syrian crisis.”

    US Russia NavyThe source further told the Lebanese daily that “the US forces fired these two rockets from a NATO base in Spain, and were instantly detected by the Russian radars and confronted by the Russian defense systems, so one of them exploded in the airspace and the second one diverted towards the sea.”

    In this context, the source pointed out that “the statement issued by the Russian Defense Ministry, which stated the detection of two ballistic missiles fired towards the Middle East, intended to neglect two points: the first was the location from which the two rockets were fired, and the second was their downing. Why? Because the moment the full military operation was launched, Head of the Russian Intelligence Service contacted the US intelligence and informed it that “hitting Damascus means hitting Moscow, and we have removed the term “downed the two missiles” from the statement to preserve the bilateral relations and to avoid escalation. Therefore, you must immediately reconsider your policies, approaches and intentions on the Syrian crisis, as you must be certain that you cannot eliminate our presence in the Mediterranean.”

    “This unannounced direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington increased the Obama Administration’s confusion and certainty that the Russian side was ready to move until the end with the Syrian cause, and that the US did not have a way out of its impasse except through a Russian initiative which would save America’s face…” he added.

    From this point, the diplomatic source clarified that “in order to avoid further US confusion, and after Israel denied knowing anything about the rocket firing in its first statement, which is the truth, Washington demanded Tel Aviv to adopt the rocket firing to save its face in front of the International Community, especially since these two rockets were the beginning of the US aggression on Syria and the announcement of the beginning of military operations, after which US President Barack Obama was supposed to go to the G20 Summit in Russia to negotiate the destiny of Syrian President Bashr Al-Assad. However, he went to find a way out of the impasse he’s in.”

    The source further indicated that “after the US-Russia rocket confrontation, Moscow intended to increase its number of military experts in Russia, and added to its military units and destroyers to enhance its military presence in the Mediterranean. It also set a time for announcing about its initiative on stopping the aggression on Syria after the G20 Summit, after drawing a side scene on the sidelines of the summit which was followed by two successive visits for Iranian Foreign Minister, Hussein Amir Abdul Lahyan, and Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Al-Moallem, in which a way out was agreed on with the Russian side, and it included a Syrian announcement on approving the Russian initiative regarding putting Syrian chemical weapons under international supervision and preparing Syria for joining the non-proliferation treaty.

    Finally, the source pointed out that “One of the first results of the US-Russian military confrontation was the British House of Commons’ rejection to participate in a war on Syria. This was followed by European stances, most significantly, the German stance announced by Chancellor Angela Merkel."



    Translated by Sara Taha Moughnieh



    Why did Russia issue a statement saying that they "detected" two US missiles being shot down?

    Is that such a big deal, of course radars will detect missiles being shot down.

    It was deliberately left incomplete.






    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  • #2
    I can't say for certain that Russia did shoot down these missiles. However there is a very high chance that they did, by the way apparently the missile technology that they might have used (if they did) is not something known to the public.

    This is why the fanboys on military forums with an internet connection and Google won't know about it.

    I think that it is most likely that the Russians did shoot down the American missiles.

    The Russians have made it clear they are ultimately prepared to go to nuclear war over Syria.

    If anybody wants me to elaborate on any of the above, please feel free to ask.




















    I sincerely think that Vladimir Putin has saved the world.

    I think that Putin is a hero who has stood up to a very aggressive state, the US which has murdered millions in the past few years and in total murdered more people than the Nazis.

    The last time we saw a situation like this was in 1971 during the Bangladesh war of liberation when the Soviets/Russians once again saved the day by sending a submarine to the Indian Ocean to tell the Americans, who were backing the genocidal Pakistani army, to back off.

    This ultimately led to independence and freedom for Bangladesh.

    President Putin, I salute you.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Comment


    • #3
      I must say the shia leaders are more intelligent and brave than the coward sunni leaders.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Friend View Post
        I must say the shia leaders are more intelligent and brave than the coward sunni leaders.
        Iranians are a clever race. Cleverer than Arabs, Turks, Punjabis etc.

        Iran has played a big part in Assad's survival.
        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
          Iranians are a clever race. Cleverer than Arabs, Turks, Punjabis etc.

          Iran has played a big part in Assad's survival.
          True. They are united, clever and know how to play the game and who to take as friends.

          Comment


          • #6
            Putin is the gayest president in the entire world.
            Originally posted by Firdousi
            Never talk with Afghans about politics. All their political knowledge is limited to conspiracy theories, political demonization and contradictions. No logic, no reason.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Friend View Post
              True. They are united, clever and know how to play the game and who to take as friends.
              the thing about shias is that, because they are a minority in the muslim world, they are more united, same thing with jews

              I think sunnis among themselves are too divided, they can't agree on most things among themselves, there is no sunni leader, at least shia's have their Ayatullah

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
                Iranians are a clever race. Cleverer than Arabs, Turks, Punjabis etc.

                Iran has played a big part in Assad's survival.
                and Bengalis
                [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Shamlawar Khurasani View Post
                  Putin is the gayest president in the entire world.
                  What a thoughtful, contributory comment.
                  Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                  A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                  For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                  The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                  -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Putin is like a bond villain.
                    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                    Sayyid Qutb

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
                      Iranians are a clever race. Cleverer than Arabs, Turks, Punjabis etc.

                      Iran has played a big part in Assad's survival.
                      If this in reference to the Iranian regime, then I disagree.

                      Is Assad surviving? He has no control of large parts of Syria, and the rebels are already in Damascus. The status quo is no longer.

                      For Iran, to at one point state and use rhetoric that they wish to wipe Israel of the face of the earth- and to make it clear that this is the cornerstone of some supposed "Anti-Zionist/Axis of resistance" policy- thats stupid.

                      To state that "an attack on Syria is an attack on Iran" as Iran did a few months ago, and then to not do anything the very next day when Israel airstrikes targeted Assads forces- is plain stupid. What happened to the "Axis of Resistance?"

                      Iran is directly supporting a war against poor and parsley armed Sunnis in Syria. Instead of trying to erase the Sunni-Shiite divide, they have widened it.

                      They do not have the interest to fight other well armed countries, especially Israel. They only wish Israel didnt take their public threats seriously enough to consider taking action against them.

                      Iran is banking their hopes on a diplomatic breakthrough with the P5+1 group that they think will ward of an Israeli war against them.

                      This is called being stupid.
                      Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 09-16-2013, 03:03 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
                        What a thoughtful, contributory comment.
                        Thank you.
                        Originally posted by Firdousi
                        Never talk with Afghans about politics. All their political knowledge is limited to conspiracy theories, political demonization and contradictions. No logic, no reason.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          bengal tiger you are starting to get on my nerves , especially when you are praising these communist types all over the forum.

                          i thought you were a reasonable adult but it seems you are just one sided and biased and dont know whats going on.

                          now i understand why you would hate jamat types.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
                            Iranians are a clever race. Cleverer than Arabs, Turks, Punjabis etc.

                            Iran has played a big part in Assad's survival.
                            so you support the mass murder of muslims(especially ahle sunnah)?
                            you should be ashamed of yourself for calling cunning and evil ,clever.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
                              bengal tiger you are starting to get on my nerves , especially when you are praising these communist types all over the forum.

                              i thought you were a reasonable adult but it seems you are just one sided and biased and dont know whats going on.

                              now i understand why you would hate jamat types.
                              1. You are a rude, aggressive bully who bullies people in this forum in to silence by abusing them and insulting them if they say something you do not agree with.

                              You have silenced many in this forum and driven many away.

                              2. You are also ignorant and uneducated and know nothing about Jamaat e Islami in Bangladesh which is pro-Pakistan and a tool of the ISI and which is hated by other Islamic groups, virtually all of the Islamic ulama and the Bangladeshi nation.

                              For a person with such little knowledge you seriously do have one heck of a big mouth.

                              Welcome to ignore.
                              * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X