Baygham;
So you are telling me that scientists in Iran, Pakistan, Indonesia, India, Malaysia etc. who are Muslims are not really Muslims? What do you mean original contribution? You want them to discover the G particle without the required economic investments?
For Muslims original contribution to sciences a simple google would do the trick:
Science in medieval Islam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now you are going to bring up the issue of today Muslims and not the 13th century. Well, there are many reasons, religious orthodoxy being one of them but not the major contributing factor. In fact I would argue that religion can play a positive role in advancing a civilization. For example if it wasn't for preaching Christianity and spreading the word of Jesus to the rest of the world the West wouldn't have acquired much of its knowledge, wealth, and resources that it has today. The same with early Muslims and Islam, their expeditions for spreading Islam also made them wealthy, resourceful and a center base for knowledge. However the crusades, mongol invasion and World War 1 gave the Muslim world enough to set them back.
What contributions have the Africans made to science, South Americans, or East Asians? What religions did they follow? Heck almost everyone except the Europeans, what extraordinary contributions have they made before the birth of the industrial age in the West? If you don't take geo-political outcomes, colonialism, and the birth of the industrial age into consideration, basically what you are saying is that the rest of the world is inherently retarded when it comes to the master race Eurpiods. Something that the social darwinists and neo-facists argue.
You hold belief in God responsible, in particular the Islamic faith, for the shortcomings of the present day Muslims without giving any realistic reasons or proof.
This is what Dust is stressing. Simply put, your are scapegoating.
Walk into a basic science lab and if you found one practicing musalman in any lab in the world who has made original contribution than come and refute it. Otherwise accept my theory based on case series and with its own predictive model which says it doesnot happen.
For Muslims original contribution to sciences a simple google would do the trick:
Science in medieval Islam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now you are going to bring up the issue of today Muslims and not the 13th century. Well, there are many reasons, religious orthodoxy being one of them but not the major contributing factor. In fact I would argue that religion can play a positive role in advancing a civilization. For example if it wasn't for preaching Christianity and spreading the word of Jesus to the rest of the world the West wouldn't have acquired much of its knowledge, wealth, and resources that it has today. The same with early Muslims and Islam, their expeditions for spreading Islam also made them wealthy, resourceful and a center base for knowledge. However the crusades, mongol invasion and World War 1 gave the Muslim world enough to set them back.
What contributions have the Africans made to science, South Americans, or East Asians? What religions did they follow? Heck almost everyone except the Europeans, what extraordinary contributions have they made before the birth of the industrial age in the West? If you don't take geo-political outcomes, colonialism, and the birth of the industrial age into consideration, basically what you are saying is that the rest of the world is inherently retarded when it comes to the master race Eurpiods. Something that the social darwinists and neo-facists argue.
You hold belief in God responsible, in particular the Islamic faith, for the shortcomings of the present day Muslims without giving any realistic reasons or proof.
This is what Dust is stressing. Simply put, your are scapegoating.

Comment