Pat Buchanan on Why Sarbani and his Hank Thread are Retarded

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

No, I didn't.

But why I would I do so when they explain it very clearly in their videos?

So...Why?
Are there black listed Sheikhs or ones you don't like?
People that I shouldnt listen to?

That's Incredibly circular reasoning; how do you know what they say is "clearly" correct without double checking their work? Your proposition is basically "It's correct because it's clear, it's clear because it's correct"

About your other questions; I don't know who are black listed or not, and I fail to see how this is relevant. Checking people's work is a standard practice.

[Damir9000]

That's Incredibly circular reasoning; how do you know what they say is "clearly" correct without double checking their work? Your proposition is basically "It's correct because it's clear, it's clear because it's correct"

About your other questions; I don't know who are black listed or not, and I fail to see how this is relevant. Checking people's work is a standard practice.

It is clear in the sense that I understand what they are saying.
No further inquiry is necessary.

Double checking their work? What work?
They are basically explaining their religion & proselytizing.
They just make speeches. conferences and videos.


The reason I asked that question is because there is no reason to investigate them if there reliable and not in the fringe.

Islam has existed for 1400 years. It is not a damn mystery.

The only thing that is new is apologeticism.

[Golden]

How will we prove we're not muslims?

well...

1) Eat pork
2) Drink Beer
3) Draw Muhammad on the quran
4) Rip pages off the Quran and use them as Toilet paper.

I think this will be a good test. Why do you think? Is it foolproof enough?

But then again, Why would we need to prove were not muslims anymore?

I don't think this will work in the eyes of your masters. Nazis initially allowed self hater Jews to live who were helping them to track down Jews but when Nazis no longer needed them they put them in concentration camps anyway.

Same fate awaits for likes of you. Hail Donald Trump, hopefully he wins.

[Damir9000]

I don't think this will work in the eyes of your masters. Nazis initially allowed self hater Jews to live who were helping them to track down Jews but when Nazis no longer needed them they put them in concentration camps anyway.

Same fate awaits for likes of you. Hail Donald Trump, hopefully he wins.

Do you really believe that?

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

It is clear in the sense that I understand what they are saying.
No further inquiry is necessary.

Double checking their work? What work?
They are basically explaining their religion & proselytizing.
They just make speeches. conferences and videos.


The reason I asked that question is because there is no reason to investigate them if there reliable and not in the fringe.

Islam has existed for 1400 years. It is not a damn mystery.

The only thing that is new is apologeticism.

If there was no work that goes into something; there wouldn't be Scholarship for their to be categories of scholars called Sheiikhs and hence no "Sheikhs
Videos" for them to explain what they supposedly know. How do you know if someone is reliable or not without investigation?

In essence you've admitted that you've based your position on intellectual laziness.

[Damir9000]

If there was no work that goes into something; there wouldn't be Scholarship for their to be categories of scholars called Sheiikhs and hence no "Sheikhs
Videos" for them to explain what they supposedly know. How do you know if someone is reliable or not without investigation?

In essence you've admitted that you've based your position on intellectual laziness.

lol

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

lol

Checkmate.

[Sarbani]

[MENTION=17856]
Note: I'm not claiming they are false, I'm claiming you haven't demonstrated their Truth.

So then why are you wasting my time with the argument? Just claim they're false or not so we can continue instead of just nitpicking useless stuff to argue.

My explanation would be that because it's a Hip-trendy White people thing to do among Young White Liberals to seem "Enlightened".

Sort of like when I see Indian girls try to do "Yoga" taking ridiculous photos of themselves, just like white girls do on Instagram. Similar social phenomena exists with Third World Atheists and Leftists.

I've never heard of White liberals that support the Muslim separatists of the Philippines or Thailand, ever. Also, why don't I support the Palestinians when most White liberals do?

And Arabic is the Lingua Franca of Islamic Scholarship......comparison stays.

English became the lingua franca cause of colonialism, the racist Anglo god didn't choose for it to become the lingua franca. However, the racist Muslim god chose for Arabic to become the lingua franca for Islam and made it sunnah for them to use Arabic names and awarded prophethood to an Arab. Also, why have ALL the prophets been from the Middle East?

[Sarbani]

(what a dumb quote. A religion that was taken up by the Turks in short duration and associated with the Sultans, and even the Mongol hordes is hardly Arabocentric. Thats just more worthless retarded thought farts emanating from that minority crypto failed commie become democrat lately brain of yours)

Christianity is a Middle Eastern centric religion where the Middle Eastern Jew, Jesus, is god and the myths in their books are all Middle Eastern-centric. Just because it was associated with Euros doesn't make it Eurocentric.

Same applies to Islam.

[Sarbani]

Laughable. Decades of Mubarak and now Sisi and the Shah of Iran as well as hundreds of other tin pot handicapped mental nitwits including Najibullah were the definition of "delusional" and "power hungry." Only the crypto minority faction like yourself would be so imbecilic as to think anything otherwise when even the Western world is beginning to own up to the fact that these religious militants are responding to their foreign policy though instead of humanely altering trajectory they are now asserting the "might makes right" doctrine instead.

Those stuff are pretty recent. Religions did not start out as responses to secularism.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

So then why are you wasting my time with the argument? Just claim they're false or not so we can continue instead of just nitpicking useless stuff to argue.

Because your logic is faulty and shows you have poor reasoning that establishes your position.

I've never heard of White liberals that support the Muslim separatists of the Philippines or Thailand, ever. Also, why don't I support the Palestinians when most White liberals do?

But we all know white liberals that are all about #BlackLivesMatter

And Hilary Clinton is all about Israel, and she's a White Liberal

ZING!

English became the lingua franca cause of colonialism, the racist Anglo god didn't choose for it to become the lingua franca. However, the racist Muslim god chose for Arabic to become the lingua franca for Islam and made it sunnah for them to use Arabic names and awarded prophethood to an Arab. Also, why have ALL the prophets been from the Middle East?

Which is a complete back peddle from your earlier statement, that you don't claim that Islam is Arab-supremacist. But you're doing so now by invoking racism.

Racism | Definition of Racism by Merriam-Webster

a.) Arab isn't a "race", but an ethnicity.

b.) The Definition of "X-Y-Z-Supremacist" coincides within the definition of racism in the idea of "X-Y-X group" being superior to another

Which means you've falsified your thesis by contradiction. and that a lingua franca cannot therefore in and of itself signify an ethnocentric view point.