Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NATIONALISM ('Asabiyyah)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
    take a look at how the precsious caliphate treated the prophets family:
    Imam Hassan- Murdered on the orders of Muawiya the first ummayad
    Imam Hussain- Murdered due Yazeed and his lust for power... yazeed the heir of Muawiya
    Imam zain al abaden- posioned on the orders of Caliph al walid
    Imam Baqir- Posioned on the orders of Caliph Hisham malik
    Imam Jaffer- Posioned on the orders of calip al mansor
    Imam Musa- Put into prison and executed on the orders of Caliph Haroon rashid
    Imam Reza- Killed on orders from Caliph mamun
    Imam Taqi-Killed by his wife ( daughter of caliph mamun)
    Imam Hadi-Killed by Caliph Mutaz
    Imam Askari-placed under house arrest and executed by caliph Mutamid..



    this is just what the caliphate did to the prophets household... Lord knows what cruelty they did on the average muslim... treating non arabs like dirt....
    but hey this is the caliphate!!!!!!!! the same system you wish 2 take us back 2!
    You don't have any idea of what you are talking about.
    O'faithful hearken thy vezir, for he promises them another Gandamak and for the ancestors of Hari Nalwa a similar fate has been sealed. We shall shake the foundations of their inner sanctums, written in gold and immortal will remain this endeavor of Afghans.

    Comment


    • #17
      its fact my friend.... thats what your caliphate did .... reserach those caliphs and see for yourself... I suppose Imam hussains head flew off his shoulders by itself ? who knws...
      Last edited by Dreamer; 06-26-2010, 11:39 AM.
      Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


      Comment


      • #18
        caliphate is a joke... simple as... those caliphs acted in their own interests seeking to eliminate any party who posed a threat to them... most of the prophets decendenents were slaughtered by them... they gained territory not 4 Islam but because of the worldly booty it aquired them... no wonder they lived in palatial palaces
        Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Dreamer View Post
          caliphate is a joke... simple as... those caliphs acted in their own interests seeking to eliminate any party who posed a threat to them... most of the prophets decendenents were slaughtered by them... they gained territory not 4 Islam but because of the worldly booty it aquired them... no wonder they lived in palatial palaces
          The orientalist Bernard Lewis wrote in his book ‘What Went Wrong?’:

          "Islam represented the greatest military power on earth…It was the foremost economic power in the world…It had achieved the highest level so far in human history, in the arts and sciences of civilization...Islam in contrast created a world civilization, poly-ethnic, multiracial, international, one might even say intercontinental."

          Comment


          • #20
            Islamic society

            The development of Nanotechnology by the US is considered the cutting edge of scientific research. The US by many standards is considered decades ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to technology. However Muslims were once, by some estimates, over two hundred and fifty years ahead of the rest of the world. A simple example will illustrate this superiority. In the year 976CE, the library of Cordoba in Andalus (Muslim Spain), employed five hundred librarians, scribes, physicians, historians, geographers and copyists, contained over four hundred thousand volumes and was backed by a library catalogue of forty-four volumes each twenty sheets long, arranged by subject and order of acquisition.

            In contrast estimates of the largest collection of books in non-Muslim Europe at the time vary between four hundred books and just thirty-six. The spirit of learning in the cities of Andalus, such as Toledo, drew many students but various universities had set up in other Muslim lands during the 7th and 8th centuries. Baghdad and Damascus were renowned globally as centres of learning and the world’s oldest university still in operation is Al-Azhar in Cairo built in 971CE. In contrast the university of Oxford was set up late in the 12th century CE, Cambridge in the 13th and even into the 14th century CE, the library at the University of Paris only had around two thousand books.

            For five or so centuries after the birth of Isa (AS) the growth of barbarian hoards had led many centres of civilisation to become insular and defensive pockets in a desperate effort to protect themselves. This of course restricted contact between civilisations and the advancement of humanity fell into relative decline.

            Attempts to resurrect the vibrancy of the earlier period were limited indeed but the Muslims changed this. With the Islamic civilisation rising in such a resolute manner in the 8th century the Muslims made the decision to initiate and manage the greatest translation project in history resolving to translate the work of the Ancient Greeks into Arabic to preserve them from being lost forever.

            The careful and painstaking archive work took time, effort and co-ordination. An institute named Al-Bait ul-Hikmah (literally ‘The House of Wisdom’) was set up and run in Baghdad for this purpose. All of this was at the behest of the Caliph (or overall ruler of the Islamic world) of time. He also had an observatory built there and died in 833CE. Other rulers such as Al-Mansur ordered plentiful resources to achieve the task. Translation became a state industry and the Muslim scholars succeeded in what is still regarded as a truly incredible feat.

            Those who study Islam with a view to attacking it and maligning it argue the Muslim world just translated the works of Ancient Greece and no more. They say the Muslims learnt nothing, did nothing and added nothing but if that were true there would be no change from the Greek work of the 4th century to the Greek work in the 16th when it was all returned to them. However one has to ask what explanation could there be for the following?

            Algebra
            Paper
            Printing
            Windmills
            The compass & astrolabe
            Glass making
            Production of cotton
            Paper money and cheques
            The number 0 (decimals are not possible without it)
            Personal hygiene


            Islamic Spain

            Europe had been embroiled in almost constant wars of horrific brutality. Invading hordes and fleeing refugees swamped the continent. In contrast large sections of the Muslim world especially those parts not on the frontiers were serene and tranquil for hundreds of years. In this atmosphere various cities flourished and the story was the same throughout the rest of the Muslim world.

            When the Muslims entered Spain in the early 8th century they found people who lived in stone hovels, dirty places with a central hole in the primitive roof to let out the smoke from the small fire they lived around. The inhabitants of these pits would be consumed by soot, tears streaming down their faces. Eye and respiratory diseases were common.

            The Spanish would refuse to wash, believing in a form of spirituality that meant they had to avoid an earthly or materialistic life. The animal furs they wore were handed down from generation to generation. The stench was often overpowering particularly as they lived close together in their airless cells. The Muslims, were used to courtyards, canals and gardens. The great city of Damascus in Syria had over a hundred thousand gardens alone so guided by Islam and a vision of the betterment of humanity the Muslims sought to change this. By the 10th century the Spanish city of Cordoba had two hundred thousand homes, over half a million places of worship, nine hundred public baths and libraries containing hundreds of thousands of volumes. Moreover the streets were paved with stone, cleaned, policed and lighted at night. Conduits bought water to the people’s homes and to the city many squares and gardens. Students from all over Europe descended upon the city to learn from the acknowledged master scholars of the age.

            By year 1500CE there were no Muslims left in Spain. The Muslims of Spain were attacked, starved and massacred by El Cid and the resurgent Christian forces. The Spanish Inquisition began and people were tortured and forced to convert to Christianity. Jews and Muslims were cooked alive in ovens for failing to convert although Christopher Columbus still insisted on Muslim navigators. Those suspected of not being a Catholic in Spain by the end of the 15th century were spied upon. It was thought that a predilection for washing might indicate Islamic belief and arrests and torture of those who dared to be clean were common.

            The Jews fled to the seat of the Islamic Caliphate in Istanbul to live in what many Jews believe was their Golden Age.


            Basra vs. London

            European towns, cities and settlements built walls to prevent raids from outlaws and armies but were typically vulnerable at four points; the corners.

            If enough pressure was applied at any of these points the wall would collapse and troops could flood through the breach. The Muslims solved this problem by building circular cities. Basra, renowned for its canals and orchards, was also a truly circular city with its major arterial roads forming an axis. Whenever a traveller entered through the city gates for the first time there would be no need to ask directions or follow signs since the axis roads would lead directly to the city centre where guesthouses were situated. The Islamic principle of generally segregating men and women in public life meant it would be unfortunate if travellers stumbled upon the private living quarters of the citizenry especially since this is where Muslim women would inevitably be uncovered without hijaab in their homes. To prevent this and for there to be no invitation for a tourist to accidentally leave the broad, wide public roads on the way to and from the centre the lanes branching off were deliberately narrow and constricted to indicate privacy.

            At the very centre of the city was the main mosque (masjid); the heart of Muslim community life and where congregational prayers would take place. Government buildings, the courts and the residence of the Wali (governor) would be built nearby to this so the citizens could access them easily and the city hospital could be seen from distance.

            Compare this to a large medieval European town for the first time where there would be little chance of finding the way to anything or anywhere without asking directions. Paris had no pavements till the 13th century and London none till the 14th. Both cities were filthy, dangerous and disorganised with no running water. Citizens would empty their toilet pots out of the windows onto the streets below. It was too dark at night to walk the streets safely. Window tax meant people would live in the dark to save money.

            The main hospital in Cairo, Egypt had eight thousand beds with separate wards for fevers, opthalmic work, dysentery and surgery all with segregated spaces for male and female patients in line with Islamic thinking while London was closed in 1349CE. The Thames was overflowing with dead bodies. The graveyards were full. No-one dared enter to sell or deliver food. The people were stuck in a ghost town, waiting to die. The plague had arrived. While Sultan Mohammed celebrated the building of the largest cannon on Earth a few decades later scientific advancement was clearly not a priority in London.

            When Great Fire of London ravaged the city in 1666 the people were happy about it. The filth was burnt away and reports tell us the explosion from methane emanating from the collected faeces was both visible and audible from a great distance.

            The houses could be remade and the city re-planned but even as late as the 16th – 17th century there were highwaymen on the roads, pirates on the seas, vermin in the clothing and beds, people were hungry and the bubonic plague still chronic. Wars were endless and married women in England had no right to own property till 1882.


            Conclusions

            Islam transformed a collection of largely illiterate desert tribes into a unified civilisation with a firm view upon how the world should be. After taking the Arabian peninsula the Muslims engaged both of the nearest superpowers of the day, the Persians and Romans, crushing both and establishing governance according to the principles of Islam. Soon a relatively small number of original companions of the Prophet of Islam had spread the message wide and Islamic rule encompassed lands from Spain in the West to India in the East by 711CE. This could only have been achieved if others had joined in spreading the message to those nearest them. Later a succession of wars with other powers, notably the Crusaders and the Mongols, left the Muslims unable to focus on further expansion for some time. However they eventually pushed deep into Europe at various points occupying what is now known as Moscow, besieging Vienna and plunging into French territory till the white cliffs of Dover were visible across the English Channel.

            The Muslims had a long Golden Age where the scholars were many and the discussion was challenging. The rest of the world looked to the Muslims for advancement and learning and there was no doubt in the eyes of historians of the period that the Islamic civilisation led the world for hundreds of years. It is clear we still owe a great debt to the Muslims of this period.

            The strength of the Islamic civilisation stemmed from the implementation of Islam and the high level of understanding of the way of life held by many, many individual Muslims. For a number of reasons over the following centuries Muslims began to neglect the factors that lead to their intellectual strength. The Arabic language and the process of ijtihad when combined meant an Islamic view or rule could be derived for any issue at any time. Once these had gone and a widespread desire for learning had faded those who were leaders in their fields of Islamic sciences were often so distant from each other they could not engage and lift each other. Soon the majority of Muslims were only able to imitate not initiate new thought. They were followers, unable to comprehend the depths of Islamic thought and as the Muslim world faced the age of European colonialism there were too few Muslims able to withstand the cultural onslaught. Confronted with a barrage of questions Muslim were left unable to answer or respond. The scholars who had shied away from new ideas and thoughts and no longer masters of ijtihad were left helpless. They could not approach the texts of the shari’ah directly and their answers were increasingly defensive. This led directly to masses of Muslims losing confidence in them and subsequently the Islamic solutions.

            The conquest, partition and colonisation of the Muslim world was accompanied by the installation of new educational curricula and a realignment of the founding principles of each of the newly formed principalities. Gone was an adherence to the shari’ah and in was a requirement rule by other means. Soon Muslims were bouncing aimlessly from solution to solution, ideology to ideology. Pan-Arabism, Marxism, Ba’athism (Arab socialism) and a form of secular democracy without the liberalism have all been attempted and found wanting.
            Today Muslims have turned full circle and are increasingly calling for Islamic solutions in their lives particularly in governance. The War on Terror is a consequence of ordinary Muslims losing faith in western nations such the US as honest brokers, a rejection of the interference of intergovernmental bodies like the UN and a wholesale denunciation of the Muslim rulers. Today Muslims increasingly look to non-state actors, groups and political parties for answers for the Muslim world especially those who call for a return to, and revival of, the Islamic civilisation in light of the fact that Islam really has done a lot for the world.

            Islam track record speaks for itself.

            Comment


            • #21
              Inqilab tashaqor for sharing that

              Comment


              • #22
                Erm because Gert Walders and Ayaan Hirsi are not historians or even researchers? ahaha

                Comment


                • #23
                  inqilab, do the achievements of those Arabs make you feel all warm inside? Bernard Lewis was one orientalist, do you want me to quote Moore?

                  Did you know that all the non-Arab Muslims had to pay Jizya to the Caliphs? Who are you kidding?

                  Algebra (yes, a lot of Persian and Turkish scholars made massive strides in this field till 1400 AD)
                  Paper (already existed in China)
                  Printing (modern printing was invented in the 18th century in Europe, ancient in China)
                  Windmills (already existed in Western Europe, were developed by the Romans)
                  The compass & astrolabe (Astrolabe invented by ancient Greeks, compass too)
                  Glass making (already existed in ancient Greece)
                  Production of cotton (cotton was growing in India when Arabs were chasing camels)
                  Paper money and cheques (Chinese were first to use paper money)
                  The number 0 (decimals are not possible without it) (invented by filthy Hindus)
                  Personal hygiene (the tables have turned now, haven't they?)

                  I can refute a lot of the other stuff you said but I'm gonna go watch Ghana defeat the USA now.

                  Islam track record speaks for itself.
                  No one denies that the Arabs developed a strong civilization from 900-1200AD (roughly). However, what does Islam have to do with it? The Almoravids and Almohads did a whole bunch of stuff that was the opposite of Islam is supposed to be. So did the Ummayyad and Abbassid caliphs. The Arabs triumphed over a crumbling Byzantium Empire and a few European territories that were under the Dark Ages.

                  Also, do those 300 years of Arab conquests, out of 1500 years of Islam's history, represent a good track record? Considering how the Arabs turned into goats and camels again under the Turkish occupation, it didn't do them much good, did it? 300 years out of 1500 years is 1/5. So being subjugated by foreigners for 4/5ths of your lifespan is a good track record?

                  This "we had an Islamic civilization" farce that is poisonous. Firstly, because "we" never had it. A few influential Arab tribes had it for a period of time and then they were wiped off the map by the Mongols. They used Turks as mercenary soldiers, Persians as scientists and us Pashtuns as nothing because we weren't fully Islamized well until the time of Mahmud Ghaznavi. Secondly, it wasn't an Islamic civilization. It was a civilization in which the people practiced Islam and that's it.

                  And if you think religions are made glorious by the achievements of its adherents, we should all be either agnostic or Christian now because the scientific progress of the last 300 years has been greater than all the work done in the last 6000 years of civilization.
                  Last edited by Levanaye Zalmaye; 06-26-2010, 03:50 PM.
                  "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

                  "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Pure exaggeration. There is no such thing as an 'Islamic' civilization. And what about the non-Arab 'Mawalis' in Islam? They were not allowed to own property or marry Arab women. And what of the Arab imperialism in Sindh (against the Son Of the Sindhi Soil, Raja Dahir) and Spain (against the brave Visigoths of Roderick)?

                    Have you ever opened up a well referenced history book on Islaamic conquests? In fact have you ever even read the Qur'an before you even speak about Islaam?

                    You're a broken record of bigotry

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by inqilab View Post
                      Islamic society

                      The development of Nanotechnology by the US is considered the cutting edge of scientific research. The US by many standards is considered decades ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to technology. However Muslims were once, by some estimates, over two hundred and fifty years ahead of the rest of the world. A simple example will illustrate this superiority. In the year 976CE, the library of Cordoba in Andalus (Muslim Spain), employed five hundred librarians, scribes, physicians, historians, geographers and copyists, contained over four hundred thousand volumes and was backed by a library catalogue of forty-four volumes each twenty sheets long, arranged by subject and order of acquisition.

                      In contrast estimates of the largest collection of books in non-Muslim Europe at the time vary between four hundred books and just thirty-six. The spirit of learning in the cities of Andalus, such as Toledo, drew many students but various universities had set up in other Muslim lands during the 7th and 8th centuries. Baghdad and Damascus were renowned globally as centres of learning and the world’s oldest university still in operation is Al-Azhar in Cairo built in 971CE. In contrast the university of Oxford was set up late in the 12th century CE, Cambridge in the 13th and even into the 14th century CE, the library at the University of Paris only had around two thousand books.

                      For five or so centuries after the birth of Isa (AS) the growth of barbarian hoards had led many centres of civilisation to become insular and defensive pockets in a desperate effort to protect themselves. This of course restricted contact between civilisations and the advancement of humanity fell into relative decline.

                      Attempts to resurrect the vibrancy of the earlier period were limited indeed but the Muslims changed this. With the Islamic civilisation rising in such a resolute manner in the 8th century the Muslims made the decision to initiate and manage the greatest translation project in history resolving to translate the work of the Ancient Greeks into Arabic to preserve them from being lost forever.

                      The careful and painstaking archive work took time, effort and co-ordination. An institute named Al-Bait ul-Hikmah (literally ‘The House of Wisdom’) was set up and run in Baghdad for this purpose. All of this was at the behest of the Caliph (or overall ruler of the Islamic world) of time. He also had an observatory built there and died in 833CE. Other rulers such as Al-Mansur ordered plentiful resources to achieve the task. Translation became a state industry and the Muslim scholars succeeded in what is still regarded as a truly incredible feat.

                      Those who study Islam with a view to attacking it and maligning it argue the Muslim world just translated the works of Ancient Greece and no more. They say the Muslims learnt nothing, did nothing and added nothing but if that were true there would be no change from the Greek work of the 4th century to the Greek work in the 16th when it was all returned to them. However one has to ask what explanation could there be for the following?

                      Algebra
                      Paper
                      Printing
                      Windmills
                      The compass & astrolabe
                      Glass making
                      Production of cotton
                      Paper money and cheques
                      The number 0 (decimals are not possible without it)
                      Personal hygiene


                      Islamic Spain

                      Europe had been embroiled in almost constant wars of horrific brutality. Invading hordes and fleeing refugees swamped the continent. In contrast large sections of the Muslim world especially those parts not on the frontiers were serene and tranquil for hundreds of years. In this atmosphere various cities flourished and the story was the same throughout the rest of the Muslim world.

                      When the Muslims entered Spain in the early 8th century they found people who lived in stone hovels, dirty places with a central hole in the primitive roof to let out the smoke from the small fire they lived around. The inhabitants of these pits would be consumed by soot, tears streaming down their faces. Eye and respiratory diseases were common.

                      The Spanish would refuse to wash, believing in a form of spirituality that meant they had to avoid an earthly or materialistic life. The animal furs they wore were handed down from generation to generation. The stench was often overpowering particularly as they lived close together in their airless cells. The Muslims, were used to courtyards, canals and gardens. The great city of Damascus in Syria had over a hundred thousand gardens alone so guided by Islam and a vision of the betterment of humanity the Muslims sought to change this. By the 10th century the Spanish city of Cordoba had two hundred thousand homes, over half a million places of worship, nine hundred public baths and libraries containing hundreds of thousands of volumes. Moreover the streets were paved with stone, cleaned, policed and lighted at night. Conduits bought water to the people’s homes and to the city many squares and gardens. Students from all over Europe descended upon the city to learn from the acknowledged master scholars of the age.

                      By year 1500CE there were no Muslims left in Spain. The Muslims of Spain were attacked, starved and massacred by El Cid and the resurgent Christian forces. The Spanish Inquisition began and people were tortured and forced to convert to Christianity. Jews and Muslims were cooked alive in ovens for failing to convert although Christopher Columbus still insisted on Muslim navigators. Those suspected of not being a Catholic in Spain by the end of the 15th century were spied upon. It was thought that a predilection for washing might indicate Islamic belief and arrests and torture of those who dared to be clean were common.

                      The Jews fled to the seat of the Islamic Caliphate in Istanbul to live in what many Jews believe was their Golden Age.


                      Basra vs. London

                      European towns, cities and settlements built walls to prevent raids from outlaws and armies but were typically vulnerable at four points; the corners.

                      If enough pressure was applied at any of these points the wall would collapse and troops could flood through the breach. The Muslims solved this problem by building circular cities. Basra, renowned for its canals and orchards, was also a truly circular city with its major arterial roads forming an axis. Whenever a traveller entered through the city gates for the first time there would be no need to ask directions or follow signs since the axis roads would lead directly to the city centre where guesthouses were situated. The Islamic principle of generally segregating men and women in public life meant it would be unfortunate if travellers stumbled upon the private living quarters of the citizenry especially since this is where Muslim women would inevitably be uncovered without hijaab in their homes. To prevent this and for there to be no invitation for a tourist to accidentally leave the broad, wide public roads on the way to and from the centre the lanes branching off were deliberately narrow and constricted to indicate privacy.

                      At the very centre of the city was the main mosque (masjid); the heart of Muslim community life and where congregational prayers would take place. Government buildings, the courts and the residence of the Wali (governor) would be built nearby to this so the citizens could access them easily and the city hospital could be seen from distance.

                      Compare this to a large medieval European town for the first time where there would be little chance of finding the way to anything or anywhere without asking directions. Paris had no pavements till the 13th century and London none till the 14th. Both cities were filthy, dangerous and disorganised with no running water. Citizens would empty their toilet pots out of the windows onto the streets below. It was too dark at night to walk the streets safely. Window tax meant people would live in the dark to save money.

                      The main hospital in Cairo, Egypt had eight thousand beds with separate wards for fevers, opthalmic work, dysentery and surgery all with segregated spaces for male and female patients in line with Islamic thinking while London was closed in 1349CE. The Thames was overflowing with dead bodies. The graveyards were full. No-one dared enter to sell or deliver food. The people were stuck in a ghost town, waiting to die. The plague had arrived. While Sultan Mohammed celebrated the building of the largest cannon on Earth a few decades later scientific advancement was clearly not a priority in London.

                      When Great Fire of London ravaged the city in 1666 the people were happy about it. The filth was burnt away and reports tell us the explosion from methane emanating from the collected faeces was both visible and audible from a great distance.

                      The houses could be remade and the city re-planned but even as late as the 16th – 17th century there were highwaymen on the roads, pirates on the seas, vermin in the clothing and beds, people were hungry and the bubonic plague still chronic. Wars were endless and married women in England had no right to own property till 1882.


                      Conclusions

                      Islam transformed a collection of largely illiterate desert tribes into a unified civilisation with a firm view upon how the world should be. After taking the Arabian peninsula the Muslims engaged both of the nearest superpowers of the day, the Persians and Romans, crushing both and establishing governance according to the principles of Islam. Soon a relatively small number of original companions of the Prophet of Islam had spread the message wide and Islamic rule encompassed lands from Spain in the West to India in the East by 711CE. This could only have been achieved if others had joined in spreading the message to those nearest them. Later a succession of wars with other powers, notably the Crusaders and the Mongols, left the Muslims unable to focus on further expansion for some time. However they eventually pushed deep into Europe at various points occupying what is now known as Moscow, besieging Vienna and plunging into French territory till the white cliffs of Dover were visible across the English Channel.

                      The Muslims had a long Golden Age where the scholars were many and the discussion was challenging. The rest of the world looked to the Muslims for advancement and learning and there was no doubt in the eyes of historians of the period that the Islamic civilisation led the world for hundreds of years. It is clear we still owe a great debt to the Muslims of this period.

                      The strength of the Islamic civilisation stemmed from the implementation of Islam and the high level of understanding of the way of life held by many, many individual Muslims. For a number of reasons over the following centuries Muslims began to neglect the factors that lead to their intellectual strength. The Arabic language and the process of ijtihad when combined meant an Islamic view or rule could be derived for any issue at any time. Once these had gone and a widespread desire for learning had faded those who were leaders in their fields of Islamic sciences were often so distant from each other they could not engage and lift each other. Soon the majority of Muslims were only able to imitate not initiate new thought. They were followers, unable to comprehend the depths of Islamic thought and as the Muslim world faced the age of European colonialism there were too few Muslims able to withstand the cultural onslaught. Confronted with a barrage of questions Muslim were left unable to answer or respond. The scholars who had shied away from new ideas and thoughts and no longer masters of ijtihad were left helpless. They could not approach the texts of the shari’ah directly and their answers were increasingly defensive. This led directly to masses of Muslims losing confidence in them and subsequently the Islamic solutions.

                      The conquest, partition and colonisation of the Muslim world was accompanied by the installation of new educational curricula and a realignment of the founding principles of each of the newly formed principalities. Gone was an adherence to the shari’ah and in was a requirement rule by other means. Soon Muslims were bouncing aimlessly from solution to solution, ideology to ideology. Pan-Arabism, Marxism, Ba’athism (Arab socialism) and a form of secular democracy without the liberalism have all been attempted and found wanting.
                      Today Muslims have turned full circle and are increasingly calling for Islamic solutions in their lives particularly in governance. The War on Terror is a consequence of ordinary Muslims losing faith in western nations such the US as honest brokers, a rejection of the interference of intergovernmental bodies like the UN and a wholesale denunciation of the Muslim rulers. Today Muslims increasingly look to non-state actors, groups and political parties for answers for the Muslim world especially those who call for a return to, and revival of, the Islamic civilisation in light of the fact that Islam really has done a lot for the world.

                      Islam track record speaks for itself.

                      did the caliphate degenerate in2 a despotic monarchy within 100 yrs of its founding... were the prophets household not persecuted by the ummayads and abbasids? yes or no... ive given u the names of the prophets progeny and their killers... if u want refute it with proof
                      Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Levanaye Zalmaye View Post
                        Did you know that all the non-Arab Muslims had to pay Jizya to the Caliphs? Who are you kidding?
                        First attempt by Mr. Commi = FAILED

                        Every Kaafir, Arab or not, had to pay tax, less then what was required from Muslim citizens

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Mutakhasis View Post
                          First attempt by Mr. Commi = FAILED

                          Every Kaafir, Arab or not, had to pay tax, less then what was required from Muslim citizens
                          No.

                          Turkish Muslims, Persian Muslims, Berber Muslims and other non-Arab Muslim converts had to pay Jizya to the Ummayyad Caliphs. Umar ibn Abdul Aziz abolished that system only to bankrupt the treasury and his successor reinstated the old system.

                          Read a history book. Or have someone read them to you.
                          "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

                          "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Nadir Shah
                            Malgariya, the realm of knowledge isn't the sole domain of the bearded demigods of Islam. Hirsi Ali is an ex-Moslem. Her refutation of Islam carries as miuch weight as the glorification of Bernard Lewis.
                            Realm of knowledge is islam.

                            Most of these "ex-muslims" were never muslim to begin with. They care just con-artists. Hirsi was never a muslim. Neither was sultana wahab or ibn warraq. And recently another con-man named ergun caner was exposed. He claimed to be an ex-muslim turn christian preacher and even wrote a book against islam. Yet he has been proven to be a liar and was never muslim.

                            These people use "ex-muslim" label to gain attention as they have nothing worth saying.

                            So they are your sources, con artists lol

                            I guess it is true. fools will only gain fools as a following.
                            Last edited by Guest; 06-26-2010, 07:10 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              None of you have any factual evidence at all. Just wasting forum space. there's nothing believable coming out of you.

                              And every disbelieving citizen payed jiziya. The arab christians and jews paid jizya in palestine. So maybe you should read an actual history book. And not fairy tales.
                              Last edited by Guest; 06-26-2010, 11:34 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by inqilab View Post
                                None of you have any factual evidence at all. Just wasting forum space. there's nothing believable coming out of you.

                                And every disbelieving citizen payed jiziya. The arab christians and jews paid jizya in palestine. So maybe you should read an actual history book. And not fairy tales.
                                the only clown is somebody who beleives tell tales stories of exocism and sectarian non sense based on ones beleif. You state Muslims run away to the west for money, ignoring the fact that the west is safe,secular,peaceful and there is no conflict between sunnis and shias due to the law and tolarance unlike your Muslim countries who burn christians alive with their families, hang dead bodies in markets to scare people and not just this, The same Muslim countries are a hell hole for an anybody who wants a peaceful and rightful life, Iqilab, you should ask yourself, why is crime much higher in a muslim country such as saudi Arabia where Shariat is applied compared to a country like Norway where Secular laws are applied but crime is much lower and the life expectancy is much higher than nearly all muslim countries up together.
                                Last edited by Guest; 06-26-2010, 11:35 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X