Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Durand Line Agreement 1893

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Durand Line Agreement 1893

    Durand Line Agreement
    (November 12, 1893)


    Agreement between Amir Abdur Rahman Khan, G. C. S. I., and Sir Henry Mortimer Durand, K. C. I. E., C. S. I.

    Whereas certain questions have arisen regarding the frontier of Afghanistan on the side of India, and whereas both His Highness the Amir and the Government of India are desirous of settling these questions by friendly understanding, and of fixing the limit of their respective spheres of influence, so that for the future there may be no difference of opinion on the subject between the allied Governments, it is hereby agreed as follows:
    1. The eastern and southern frontier of his Highness's dominions, from Wakhan to the Persian border, shall follow the line shown in the map attached to this agreement.
    2. The Government of India will at no time exercise interference in the territories lying beyond this line on the side of Afghanistan, and His Highness the Amir will at no time exercise interference in the territories lying beyond this line on the side of India.
    3. The British Government thus agrees to His Highness the Amir retaining Asmar and the valley above it, as far as Chanak. His Highness agrees, on the other hand, that he will at no time exercise interference in Swat, Bajaur, or Chitral, including the Arnawai or Bashgal valley. The British Government also agrees to leave to His Highness the Birmal tract as shown in the detailed map already given to his Highness, who relinquishes his claim to the rest of the Waziri country and Dawar. His Highness also relinquishes his claim to Chageh.
    4. The frontier line will hereafter be laid down in detail and demarcated, wherever this may be practicable and desirable, by joint British and Afghan commissioners, whose object will be to arrive by mutual understanding at a boundary which shall adhere with the greatest possible exactness to the line shown in the map attached to this agreement, having due regard to the existing local rights of villages adjoining the frontier.
    5. With reference to the question of Chaman, the Amir withdraws his objection to the new British cantonment and concedes to the British Governmeni the rights purchased by him in the Sirkai Tilerai water. At this part of the frontier the line will be drawn as follows:

      From the crest of the Khwaja Amran range near the Psha Kotal, which remains in British territory, the line will run in such a direction as to leave Murgha Chaman and the Sharobo spring to Afghanistan, and to pass half-way between the New Chaman Fort and the Afghan outpost known locally as Lashkar Dand. The line will then pass half-way between the railway station and the hill known as the Mian Baldak, and, turning south-wards, will rejoin the Khwaja Amran range, leaving the Gwasha Post in British territory, and the road to Shorawak to the west and south of Gwasha in Afghanistan. The British Government will not exercise any interference within half a mile of the road.
    6. The above articles of' agreement are regarded by the Government of India and His Highness the Amir of Afghanistan as a full and satisfactory settlement of all the principal differences of opinion which have arisen between them in regard to the frontier; and both the Government of India and His Highness the Amir undertake that any differences of detail, such as those which will have to be considered hereafter by the officers appointed to demarcate the boundary line, shall be settled in a friendly spirit, so as to remove for the future as far as possible all causes of doubt and misunderstanding between the two Governments.
    7. Being fully satisfied of His Highness's goodwill to the British Government, and wishing to see Afghanistan independent and strong, the Government of India will raise no objection to the purchase and import by His Highness of munitions of war, and they will themselves grant him some help in this respect. Further, in order to mark their sense of the friendly spirit in which His Highness the Amir has entered into these negotiations, the Government of India undertake to increase by the sum of six lakhs of rupees a year the subsidy of twelve lakhs now granted to His Highness.
    H. M. Durand,
    Amir Abdur Rahman Khan.
    </B>
    Kabul, November 12, 1893


    http://www.khyber.org/pashtohistory/...greement.shtml

  • #2
    There is no mention of 100 years expiry period. Why is this?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by BehavedMaseed View Post
      There is no mention of 100 years expiry period. Why is this?
      I am also wondering why is it so?

      So we were sold to british for 12 lakh rupees/per year.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Luffy View Post
        I am also wondering why is it so?

        So we were sold to british for 12 lakh rupees/per year.
        Worser than that is that we were sold but Hazaras who converted to Sunni were accepted instead of us.

        How can we ignore this betrayal and expect to unite with such a country? If we ever broke away from Pakistan I am sure 1000 percent that no pashtun from Pakhtunkhwa is going to support loy afghanistan or joining, we will probably opt for a own state for pashtuns only.

        Iam sorry for insulting you back in the day, I now realised this corrupted game of double standards.

        Kind Regards

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BehavedMaseed View Post
          Worser than that is that we were sold but Hazaras who converted to Sunni were accepted instead of us.

          How can we ignore this betrayal and expect to unite with such a country? If we ever broke away from Pakistan I am sure 1000 percent that no pashtun from Pakhtunkhwa is going to support loy afghanistan or joining, we will probably opt for a own state for pashtuns only.

          Iam sorry for insulting you back in the day, I now realised this corrupted game of double standards.

          Kind Regards
          Hazaras were not converted into sunnis, Nuristanis were. Hazaras were massacred for their betrayal of the government and some even moved to Quetta. Ghilzais and other Pashtun tribes west of the durand were killed as well, those that weren't were relocated to the north.

          The betrayal was done mohammadzais, the same mohammadzais many qibaell pashtuns happily defended when they rebrought Nadir Shah into power. So when you write this blame, blame all the sides, not just one. They are a finished dynasty, you can't put that blame on the Pashtuns of Afghanistan. Anymore can Pashtunkhwa pashtuns be held accountable for Babar, Roedad Khan, Ayub Khan, or the mistreatment of refugees in Peshawar.
          This is a fundamentally flawed and reactionary approach. Pashtunkhwa independence will eventually lead to its merger with Afghanistan..it is a natural process.

          P.S. I am from Pashtunkhwa, I support it, Khyaal supports it and many more. Granted it isn't the majority, but hey it is enough to disprove what you said.
          http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

          Comment


          • #6
            khodai de ghark na kah amir abdourahman
            u give our land for pakistan that's killing meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
            god save u
            ghdai de rahm wa keh
            ameen

            Comment


            • #7
              Bunch of illiterates............

              Originally posted by BehavedMaseed View Post
              Worser than that is that we were sold but Hazaras who converted to Sunni were accepted instead of us.
              Hazaras still are Shias and they weren't accepted; They were killed in millions by Abdur Rahman Khan for guiding the Britons in Afghanistan which happened to be one of the reasons why we lost Pakhtunkhwa. It were Nurestanis who were converted to Islam from Christianity since Christians a.k.a. Britons became our new enemy. Have you ever heard of a thing called a 'history book'?

              Originally posted by BehavedMaseed View Post
              How can we ignore this betrayal and expect to unite with such a country?
              Who is asking you to? We already tried to win back hearts in 1948 and 1949 but got bombed in return by Pakistan. We don't need your 'unity' in turn of such a 'favor'.

              Originally posted by BehavedMaseed View Post
              If we ever broke away from Pakistan I am sure 1000 percent that no pashtun from Pakhtunkhwa is going to support loy afghanistan or joining,
              Ask members like BLS wror, Tor Khan, Levaney Zalmay, Pakhtunzai and etcetera whether they think the same way? Oh wait, you forget your icon Bacha Khan's desire?
              Gar Jahanum Sakhtam Ferdaws Ham Mesazamat

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by hindupashtun
                Shayesta the problem is they want to get rid of our Afghan identity.
                Who does?

                Shayeste Nuristanis weren't christians they were pagan shamanists.

                And lets not all simplify history post-47 manana.
                http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                Comment


                • #9
                  ^ Huge number of Nurestanis were Christians and I know that because my in-laws are Nurestanis who are in touch with people in Nurestan who told them about they were converted to Islam. Though, they are today one of the most devoted Muslims in Afghanistan.
                  Gar Jahanum Sakhtam Ferdaws Ham Mesazamat

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Shayesta View Post
                    ^ Huge number of Nurestanis were Christians and I know that because my in-laws are Nurestanis who are in touch with people in Nurestan who told them about they were converted to Islam. Though, they are today one of the most devoted Muslims in Afghanistan.
                    Hmmmmm this is a first...I didn't know. I always heard they were pagan shamans like their relatives the kalasha. Manana
                    http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There were even Sikhs in Nurestan who had moved from Jalalabad to Nurestan in mid twentieth century.
                      Gar Jahanum Sakhtam Ferdaws Ham Mesazamat

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by pakistani
                        We were sold by people Shayestas people. How did you sell us?
                        Pakistani stop this....our areas were sold by our own kings..who were Pashtuns aka Mohammadzais. Isn't it convenient these countless threads bring these things on each other....I know you want to prove your pakistaniyath and all but come on.
                        http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pakistani
                          I am speaking the truth. you being an Afghanistani want to defend it. But now we are not same people we are different. Indian Punjabi and Pakistani Punjabi is different right??

                          we are not Afghan. We are Pakistani. People like BehavedMaseed are Pakistanis.
                          Look we have had this debate before. Since you are barely a Pashtun...so I doubt you should comment. I don't care about Indian panjabi and Pakistani panjabi..na mae dadaagaan dee ao na mae neeka ya adaee...za Pashtun yamm. Ao zamung zhaba, pashtu ao islam yaw dae. Obviously you support Jinnah so your grasp on these things is weak. Shouldn't you be somewhere else? yaw kho asae zaan na leegya yae ao bal pa rojae kae bae zae waee lolzz.
                          http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Those who are against the "Iron King" Abdul Rehman Khan are certainly ignorant of history and know him from the Paaki fed stereo type of selling Pashtunkhwa etc.
                            Abdul Rehman Khan went through the most critical and challenging time of Pashtun history.

                            ANYONE SHOW ME A SINGLE PIECE OF DOCUMENT THAT IS SIGNED OR FINGERPRINTED BY AMIR SELLING PASHTUNS FOR A PITY AMOUNT OF MONEY OR PRIVILEGES.
                            SINCE MOST OF YOU LIVE IN UK,CONSULT YOUR NATIONAL ARCHIVE AND ASK FOR A COPY IF ANY SUCH DOCUMENT EVER EXISTED!
                            Meanwhile educate yourself.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Consider this an open challenge!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X