Anyone else kinda bothered with seeing the word Pathan commonly in Western sources by Indics, especially regarding genetics? I feel like it's Indics promoting the word since they want words from their language to have higher agency.
They always use the word 'Pathan' in genetics whenever talking about the genetics of Pashtuns, especially those from Pakistan. We call ourselves Pashtuns not "Pathans". It's pretty disrespectful to use their name to refer to us when it's a name used by Indians exclusively. They also often use it as a means of division (Pashtun = Afghan Pashtun, Pathan = Pak Pashtun).
Here are two quick examples:


Genetics is where I mainly see it, and I see it consistently used there without any question. I have yet to see a genetic data sheet referring to Pashtuns from PK as 'Pashtun'. But I have also seen the word "Pathan" used in other sources as well in addition to those regarding genetics. It seems like Westerners are treating it as an equally acceptable alternative to 'Pashtun'. They also think it is the technically correct word to use when they want to specify Pashtuns from PK for some weird reason.
Now, I don't know for sure if Indics are the ones promoting this. But I mostly just see them using the word "Pathan" when talking about Pashtuns online, even when talking to Westerners. They are the only source that word could be coming from. I also feel like lately it has been becoming more common. I don't mind Indics calling us that, but I do not like it becoming our standard name in the West. And I especially don't like it being used exclusively in reference to Pashtuns from PK. Regardless of who's promoting it, it's still bothersome. If they could at the very least just stop using it in literally every single data sheet regarding genetics (since that's where it's constantly promoted), that'd be great.
They always use the word 'Pathan' in genetics whenever talking about the genetics of Pashtuns, especially those from Pakistan. We call ourselves Pashtuns not "Pathans". It's pretty disrespectful to use their name to refer to us when it's a name used by Indians exclusively. They also often use it as a means of division (Pashtun = Afghan Pashtun, Pathan = Pak Pashtun).
Here are two quick examples:


Genetics is where I mainly see it, and I see it consistently used there without any question. I have yet to see a genetic data sheet referring to Pashtuns from PK as 'Pashtun'. But I have also seen the word "Pathan" used in other sources as well in addition to those regarding genetics. It seems like Westerners are treating it as an equally acceptable alternative to 'Pashtun'. They also think it is the technically correct word to use when they want to specify Pashtuns from PK for some weird reason.
Now, I don't know for sure if Indics are the ones promoting this. But I mostly just see them using the word "Pathan" when talking about Pashtuns online, even when talking to Westerners. They are the only source that word could be coming from. I also feel like lately it has been becoming more common. I don't mind Indics calling us that, but I do not like it becoming our standard name in the West. And I especially don't like it being used exclusively in reference to Pashtuns from PK. Regardless of who's promoting it, it's still bothersome. If they could at the very least just stop using it in literally every single data sheet regarding genetics (since that's where it's constantly promoted), that'd be great.

Comment