Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistan and Afghanistan enmity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by History of Pashtuns View Post
    It was his son Timur Shah who gave in to degeneration of Persian life, not Ahmad Shah himself.

    You are simply bullshyting , its not that Pashtuns have harmed their Tajik subjugates. Subjugates do carry some degree of resentments towards their masters. Meek always despise the one carrying sword. But in my opinion this current hostility of Tajiks, is due to civil war of 90s, and subsequent split of Northern alliance and Taliban which assumed the shape of non-pashtuns vs pashtuns even though Taliban were not exactly calling themselves representatives of Pashtun nation.
    No brother, you are wrong. Seems you have no access to proper education in your failed state Pakistan.

    Ahmad Shah Abdali was gladly a servant of Nadir Shah. He served him happily. Then when he died, he even stole from his master the "koh-e noor" diamond and left him all alone. Since he was "king of Khorasan and Kabulistan" (he never called himself "king of Afghanistan") the guy needed the true sons of Khorasan, we Tajiks, help him to drive out his own Ghilzai-Hotak brothers from our Persian land. Thats why I love Ahmad Shah Durrani despite being the guy a thief: he kicked out his own Pashtun brothers in order to make us Tajiks happy.

    This endless Durrani-Ghilzai civil war must end now. You have been killing each other for almost two centuries now. Its time to stop the caveman behavior.
    "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
    I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

    -Ferdowsi.

    Comment


    • #32
      Being a Pakistani, I am well wisher towards Afghan nation, but I hope Pakistan provides weapons to any Afghan willing to cleanse these Tajek haramis. These ayatollah worshiping faggots think they are superior or better than anyone else.

      listen you ****ing faggots, the way you speak your language is so gay.

      Hal e shoma chitoriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

      Fags.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
        No brother, you are wrong. Seems you have no access to proper education in your failed state Pakistan.

        Ahmad Shah Abdali was gladly a servant of Nadir Shah. He served him happily. Then when he died, he even stole from his master the "koh-e noor" diamond and left him all alone. Since he was "king of Khorasan and Kabulistan" (he never called himself "king of Afghanistan") the guy needed the true sons of Khorasan, we Tajiks, help him to drive out his own Ghilzai-Hotak brothers from our Persian land. Thats why I love Ahmad Shah Durrani despite being the guy a thief: he kicked out his own Pashtun brothers in order to make us Tajiks happy.

        This endless Durrani-Ghilzai civil war must end now. You have been killing each other for almost two centuries now. Its time to stop the caveman behavior.
        Nadir Shah Afshar was not a Tajik or Persian but a Turkoman, he recruited large number of Sunni Afghans and Uzbeks to counter-balance the Shia Persians. In the last years of his life , he despised and suspected Persians and in very last order was to kill Persian chiefs through his Afghan unit. He himself was a Sunni. He colonized your dear Khorasan with outsiders including Afghans. So i dont understand why some Tajik fascists have profile Photos of Nadir Shah on forums. Nor i understand the love of Shia Iranians for Nadir Shah Quli. Nadir Shah Quli after conquest of Delhi, married his son with a Mughal princess, and on that occasion he hanged his 12 shia Qizalbash soldiers for singing a Shia poem about Imam Hussain.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by History of Pashtuns View Post
          It was his son Timur Shah who gave in to degeneration of Persian life, not Ahmad Shah himself.

          You are simply bullshyting , its not that Pashtuns have harmed their Tajik subjugates. Subjugates do carry some degree of resentments towards their masters. Meek always despise the one carrying sword. But in my opinion this current hostility of Tajiks, is due to civil war of 90s, and subsequent split of Northern alliance and Taliban which assumed the shape of non-pashtuns vs pashtuns even though Taliban were not exactly calling themselves representatives of Pashtun nation.
          Thank you great post. I find it hilarious how "Tajiks" jump onto the Khorasan namdagon when they didnt even exist south of the Amu Darya.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
            He is definitely Tajik. He knows way to much Afghan history and politics(they're not correct, but he still knows it).

            Then be my guest and find me a moderate Tajik. Not in real life, because obviously no one is going to express their true politically view, especially if they are in a opposing side. Find me someone in a platform where they are free to express themselves.

            The reason it is evident that Farsiwans are hostile is due to the fact that their representative have several time expressed hostile intention in the political life, without a political back clash. Their supporters have several times made mayhem in the cities of Afghanistan.
            Look at any Afghan footballer. They are all for a united Afghanistan whether Pashtuns, Tajik, Hazara etc

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
              I have been to facebook and the situation isn't much better. It is a false myth that Pashtuns have been the higher class or the so called ''Pashtun oppression''. As I said before, Farsiwans, especially Tajiks have been dining and wining with Pashtuns. It was like today with a pashtun head of state, but the strings got pulled by several others. At that time the central government didn't even have that much influence, everyone minded their own business.
              Even at that time several Tajiks went against the state and fought it. Regarding Hazara oppression, Tajiks were as much part of it as Pashtuns, but for some odd reason Pashtuns get all the blame.

              You keep saying that Pakistan is a big fault regarding all Afghanistan's problems, can you clarify what Pakistan exactly does that makes Afghanistan miserable... Pakistan's role is greatly exaggerated, because Farsiwans don't want Pashtuns to be close to each other. Lets take every issue Pakistan is blamed for and see whether Iran does the same.

              - Iran greatly oppressed Afghans, killed them, treated them like dogs, humiliated them, used them as discard-able subject. They made signs where there is written ''dogs and Afghans not allowed''.
              - Iran supported the civil war after soviet left
              - Iran today supports Taliban

              Yet, why is Pakistan blamed and get all the political garbage, while Iran is put on pedestal as our friendly neighbor... I tell you the truth, because there are Pashtuns in Pakistan, but not in Iran. Iran is our beloved Farsi speaking country who can influence the country with their cultural and linguistic Persian culture.

              Now people shouldn't get me wrong. I am not saying we should start fighting our fellow country men. All I am saying is that we should be aware of our situation. There is a problem that need to be resolved. Our issue isn't external, but internal. Therefor we should focus internally.
              The next issue is that Pakistan will in long run benefit Pashtuns. Not Pakistan as a country, but our Pashtun brethren in the other side. The same way Pakistani Pashtuns will benefit from Afghan Pashtuns.
              Have I ever said anything pro Irani? I give Iran just as much **** as Porkistan its just we have no Iranis on this forum. Iran is terrible however Porkistan is even more at fault. Pakistan brainwashed Pashtun boys in madrassas into becoming the Taliban. Pakistan are the creators of the Taliban which is the most embarrassing thing to ever happen to our people. These ****ers have toyed with our peoples lives for decades now! and If you think that their role in Afghanistan is exaggerated then I dont know what to ****ing say. Every single piece of blood that has dropped in Afghanistan since 1989 is the fault of these pieces of ****.

              Most people in favor of having Afghanistan split (youve made threads in support of this) usually say Farsiwan love Pakistan because they harm us now your saying they try to divide us from Pakistani Pashtuns stop with the BS. Pakistani Pashtuns though I still love even the Pujabified ones have caused this divide by kissing the ass of our oppressors and becoming one of them!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
                He is definitely Tajik. He knows way to much Afghan history and politics(they're not correct, but he still knows it).

                Then be my guest and find me a moderate Tajik. Not in real life, because obviously no one is going to express their true politically view, especially if they are in a opposing side. Find me someone in a platform where they are free to express themselves.

                The reason it is evident that Farsiwans are hostile is due to the fact that their representative have several time expressed hostile intention in the political life, without a political back clash. Their supporters have several times made mayhem in the cities of Afghanistan.
                I dont know if you were a member at this time but theres a guy named NICK. He knew that he was just a farsiwan and not a Tajik.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Afghanfootball View Post
                  I dont know if you were a member at this time but theres a guy named NICK. He knew that he was just a farsiwan and not a Tajik.
                  What is the difference between Farsiwan and Tajik? I heard Farsiwan are Shia?
                  Kandahar Salaam Salaam

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Barakzai Supply View Post
                    What is the difference between Farsiwan and Tajik? I heard Farsiwan are Shia?
                    I have just opened a thread on this ill tag you in it.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by History of Pashtuns
                      I concur. Is it their accent or body language some thing else, but their men do not give manly vibes but feminine and gay.
                      Nobody cares.
                      "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
                      I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

                      -Ferdowsi.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Afghanfootball View Post
                        Look at any Afghan footballer. They are all for a united Afghanistan whether Pashtuns, Tajik, Hazara etc
                        Its hilarious. This kid seems to ignore that the name of our national football team is "Lions of Khorasan" lol
                        "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
                        I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

                        -Ferdowsi.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Some Porkistani led me to this website claiming that Porkistani men are the third sexiest men in the world:



                          Apparently, the Porkistani's inferiority complex led him to this website to try and make up for his brown ****skin-like appearance. This website was based on individual men (Zayn Malik was chosen to represent Porkistan).

                          Point is that Porkistanis are reserving to desperate measures to try and feel superior to Afghans.
                          "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
                            Its hilarious. This kid seems to ignore that the name of our national football team is "Lions of Khorasan" lol
                            You do realise that Khorosan =/= Tajik land. Khorosan is the term for the place between the Oxus and the Indus rivers, not Tajikistan where your actual homeland is.
                            "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
                              Its hilarious. This kid seems to ignore that the name of our national football team is "Lions of Khorasan" lol
                              Khorasan is also used by ISIS and other Islamic nut-jobs as the promissed land. LOL

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Khostai View Post
                                Khorasan is also used by ISIS and other Islamic nut-jobs as the promissed land. LOL
                                Khorasan is such a holy name that even Prophet Muhammad considered it so. Every crazy islamofascist and Pashtun nationalist wants to steal our heritage. I don't care because I believe "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" lol
                                "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
                                I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

                                -Ferdowsi.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X