Taliban are the only solution for Afghanistan

[hairan]

My question to all those USA supporters are, How can you side with a country that has raped and killed innocent people? They made a mess out of Pashtunkhwa and Afghanistan. They ruined our international image.

That is a typical mullah problem. When you criticize mullahs for their misdeeds, instead of correcting themselves, their response alwasys is that you are a kafir or supporting kafirs/USA.

I am one among those who have been criticisng extremism and terrorism on these forums. But condemning terrorism does not automatically mean that I support USA. We condemned USA's involvement in Afghanistan even 20 years ago when the holy fathers of today's Taliban were being trained and fed by CIA for doing the same thing they are doing today. At that time when we criticized the love affair between USA/CIA and mujahedeen, there were mullahs who issued fatwas that USA was supporting Islam and jihad and for that reason they were brothers of muslims so criticisng them was against Islam. All the mujahedeen leaders visited the US, their families were fed by CIA, there were special Quran Sharifs with Pashto, Urdu and Dari translations printed in Washington and distributed from Peshawar to The Central Asian countries. Half naked American girls visited Khost and Peshawar with their boyfriends who came to meet jihadi leaders and support them. Once a jihadi man told a joke on his Pashto blog. He wrote that a young American nurse was living with them at the post. She was supposed to help the wounded but as seldomly somone got wounded, she was all the time busy having sex with one or the other mujahid. Then she got pregnant and her belly grew. One day somebody looked at her belly and asked what is this. She answered 'mujahid, mujahid.'
In Peshawar, the mullahs were busy to prove that Americans and Europeans were people of the book 'Ahl-e-Kitab', so they were brothers of muslims and whatever they were doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan was in the interest of Islam. They even said people should have relationships with the ahl-e-kitab. The Americans did not have an interest in relationships, they more interested in achieving their political goals in the region, to defeat the USSR, and at the meantime enjoyed rough sex whenever availabale. Once the goals were achieved, they left and never looked back. The mullahs were suddenly hungry. They felt defeated. They felt their relationships broken. And that was the time they turned against the US. But that does not mean they are now independent. They and their ideology is now being used by other powers in the same way for the same purposes. A repeat of history and our misery.
We condemn both of them - the terrorists and their true fathers, the Americans.

[hairan]

Hairan.

I am from Hindu chowk Kandahar. Taliban did not treat us as bad as you might think they did. My sources from Shkafar bazar tell me the Canadians are much more abusive.

how do you explain this? who do you want to be in power? a Pashtun? or American?

You seem to be a Hindu Taliban and mullah if you are really a Hindu. I form this conclusion from your last question because I don't want even my father to be in power if he is cruel and extremist. I condemn the Canadians if they are abusive. I am not in favor of anyone - be Canadian, American, Pashtun, Hazara, anyone - who is abusive. But what I know from my knowledge is that thousands of Hindus and Sikhs fled Afghanistan during the Taliban and the remaining were forced to wear yellow clothes. I don't know who you are and what are your sources, but that has not happened after the Taliban were ousted from Afghanistan.

[IamDZJ]

at this point of time our people need to be disciplined by some one who will not brainwash them at the end. i m sorry to say this but reasoning is not the solution since every one comes from a very different angle.

[Roshina]

^ Shlombay, would you yourself be willing to live in Afghanistan or any other country if it's ruled by the Taliban?

[Roshina]

^ It's not 'derailing' the thread, mara. (God, I see this word used SO much here that I think we need a synonym for it.) It's a question to you and/or to anyone who thinks it's okay for the Taliban to rule. I ask because ... most who want this aren't living IN Afghanistan! :| They themselves are enjoying the pleasures that the west is blessing them with, but they say the Taliban should rule Afghanistan -- while they're oceans away form all the brutalities!

So, yeah. You don't have to answer, of course. I totally understand.

[hairan]

There was a joke that somebody asked a cartoonist if he liked dictatorship or democracy. His answer was: 'For others, I like dictatorship; for myself, I like democracy.' This is a good example of hypocrisy in our region. The Taliban during their rule enforced a strict rule on any kind of photos because in their extreme interpretation of the religion drawing and seeing pictures of human beings is haram. But now they use every kind of videos and color magazines with large size photographs for their own interests. Also they enforced a complete ban on media because they said freedom of media is kufar but now they say they have the right of freely speaking on media. Again munafeqat!

[Mutakhasis]

You're the only munafiq here who keeps spewing the typical propaganda. If you could close your sewage mouth maybe you will have some honor and be respected

The Taliban even had their own media minister Mullah NooruddDeen Zadran, they banned television in certain areas as they didn't have control over the source

Drawing pictures of humans and animals is haraam, photography is not drawing you senseless hypocrite

[hairan]

Drawing pictures of humans and animals is haraam, photography is not drawing you senseless hypocrite

So photography and videos are not haram in Taliban sharia? I remember they banned any kind of photography of any living thing. Is that wrong?

For your other comments, I only can say 'thanks.'

[akbarkhan]

Mao although a great guerilla commander was a failure in terms of economics. His great leap forward killed millions.

Correct, but not relevant to the point I made.

The crux of the matter is that a revolutionary movement's ethos and struggle must resonate that of the local vox populi, else they will be unable to sustain themselves let alone being able to overburden a confederation of fifty mighty countries. We should all put our biases aside and reflect on this fact, not to support a certain group but to understand our society and its aspirations logically & scientifically.

[єѕαρχαι]

Taliban with some reforms could be much better for afghanistan

[شمله ور خراساني]

That is a typical mullah problem. When you criticize mullahs for their misdeeds, instead of correcting themselves, their response alwasys is that you are a kafir or supporting kafirs/USA.

I am one among those who have been criticisng extremism and terrorism on these forums. But condemning terrorism does not automatically mean that I support USA. We condemned USA's involvement in Afghanistan even 20 years ago when the holy fathers of today's Taliban were being trained and fed by CIA for doing the same thing they are doing today. At that time when we criticized the love affair between USA/CIA and mujahedeen, there were mullahs who issued fatwas that USA was supporting Islam and jihad and for that reason they were brothers of muslims so criticisng them was against Islam. All the mujahedeen leaders visited the US, their families were fed by CIA, there were special Quran Sharifs with Pashto, Urdu and Dari translations printed in Washington and distributed from Peshawar to The Central Asian countries. Half naked American girls visited Khost and Peshawar with their boyfriends who came to meet jihadi leaders and support them. Once a jihadi man told a joke on his Pashto blog. He wrote that a young American nurse was living with them at the post. She was supposed to help the wounded but as seldomly somone got wounded, she was all the time busy having sex with one or the other mujahid. Then she got pregnant and her belly grew. One day somebody looked at her belly and asked what is this. She answered 'mujahid, mujahid.'
In Peshawar, the mullahs were busy to prove that Americans and Europeans were people of the book 'Ahl-e-Kitab', so they were brothers of muslims and whatever they were doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan was in the interest of Islam. They even said people should have relationships with the ahl-e-kitab. The Americans did not have an interest in relationships, they more interested in achieving their political goals in the region, to defeat the USSR, and at the meantime enjoyed rough sex whenever availabale. Once the goals were achieved, they left and never looked back. The mullahs were suddenly hungry. They felt defeated. They felt their relationships broken. And that was the time they turned against the US. But that does not mean they are now independent. They and their ideology is now being used by other powers in the same way for the same purposes. A repeat of history and our misery.
We condemn both of them - the terrorists and their true fathers, the Americans.

While yourt country is occupied by almost 50 different nations and everyday many people die and suffer from the violence at the hand of invaders, you find enough time and energy to attack and criticize your fellow Muslim brothers who are fighting the aggressors.

This is obviously a sign of nifaaq.

[hairan]

While yourt country is occupied by almost 50 different nations and everyday many people die and suffer from the violence at the hand of invaders, you find enough time and energy to attack and criticize your fellow Muslim brothers who are fighting the aggressors.

This is obviously a sign of nifaaq.

That is a typical mullah problem. When you criticize mullahs for their misdeeds, instead of correcting themselves, their response alwasys is that you are a kafir or supporting kafirs/USA.

I am one among those who have been criticisng extremism and terrorism on these forums. But condemning terrorism does not automatically mean that I support USA. We condemned USA's involvement in Afghanistan even 20 years ago when the holy fathers of today's Taliban were being trained and fed by CIA for doing the same thing they are doing today. At that time when we criticized the love affair between USA/CIA and mujahedeen, there were mullahs who issued fatwas that USA was supporting Islam and jihad and for that reason they were brothers of muslims so criticisng them was against Islam. All the mujahedeen leaders visited the US, their families were fed by CIA, there were special Quran Sharifs with Pashto, Urdu and Dari translations printed in Washington and distributed from Peshawar to The Central Asian countries. Half naked American girls visited Khost and Peshawar with their boyfriends who came to meet jihadi leaders and support them. Once a jihadi man told a joke on his Pashto blog. He wrote that a young American nurse was living with them at the post. She was supposed to help the wounded but as seldomly somone got wounded, she was all the time busy having sex with one or the other mujahid. Then she got pregnant and her belly grew. One day somebody looked at her belly and asked what is this. She answered 'mujahid, mujahid.'
In Peshawar, the mullahs were busy to prove that Americans and Europeans were people of the book 'Ahl-e-Kitab', so they were brothers of muslims and whatever they were doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan was in the interest of Islam. They even said people should have relationships with the ahl-e-kitab. The Americans did not have an interest in relationships, they more interested in achieving their political goals in the region, to defeat the USSR, and at the meantime enjoyed rough sex whenever availabale. Once the goals were achieved, they left and never looked back. The mullahs were suddenly hungry. They felt defeated. They felt their relationships broken. And that was the time they turned against the US. But that does not mean they are now independent. They and their ideology is now being used by other powers in the same way for the same purposes. A repeat of history and our misery.
We condemn both of them - the terrorists and their true fathers, the Americans.

[akbarkhan]

smells a commi

[شمله ور خراساني]

That is a typical mullah problem. When you criticize mullahs for their misdeeds, instead of correcting themselves, their response alwasys is that you are a kafir or supporting kafirs/USA.

I am one among those who have been criticisng extremism and terrorism on these forums. But condemning terrorism does not automatically mean that I support USA. We condemned USA's involvement in Afghanistan even 20 years ago when the holy fathers of today's Taliban were being trained and fed by CIA for doing the same thing they are doing today. At that time when we criticized the love affair between USA/CIA and mujahedeen, there were mullahs who issued fatwas that USA was supporting Islam and jihad and for that reason they were brothers of muslims so criticisng them was against Islam. All the mujahedeen leaders visited the US, their families were fed by CIA, there were special Quran Sharifs with Pashto, Urdu and Dari translations printed in Washington and distributed from Peshawar to The Central Asian countries. Half naked American girls visited Khost and Peshawar with their boyfriends who came to meet jihadi leaders and support them. Once a jihadi man told a joke on his Pashto blog. He wrote that a young American nurse was living with them at the post. She was supposed to help the wounded but as seldomly somone got wounded, she was all the time busy having sex with one or the other mujahid. Then she got pregnant and her belly grew. One day somebody looked at her belly and asked what is this. She answered 'mujahid, mujahid.'
In Peshawar, the mullahs were busy to prove that Americans and Europeans were people of the book 'Ahl-e-Kitab', so they were brothers of muslims and whatever they were doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan was in the interest of Islam. They even said people should have relationships with the ahl-e-kitab. The Americans did not have an interest in relationships, they more interested in achieving their political goals in the region, to defeat the USSR, and at the meantime enjoyed rough sex whenever availabale. Once the goals were achieved, they left and never looked back. The mullahs were suddenly hungry. They felt defeated. They felt their relationships broken. And that was the time they turned against the US. But that does not mean they are now independent. They and their ideology is now being used by other powers in the same way for the same purposes. A repeat of history and our misery.
We condemn both of them - the terrorists and their true fathers, the Americans.

Why do you keep repeating yourself?

Do you have standard templates you are told to use by your boss to spread your propaganda on public forums?

[hairan]

د ډاکټر محمد حنیف په نامه د طالبانو یو ویاند و چې بیا د ځینو خلکو په وینا طالبانو په خپله وروسته له هغې له منځه یوړلو چې دولت ته تسلیم شو او د سولې ژوند یې غوره کړ. کله چې ویاند و نو یوه ورځ یې مونږ ته زنګ وواهه او ډېر په غوصه یې وویل چې تاسې زمونږ خبرونه سم نه نشروئ، زه هره ورځ شل خبرونه درکوم خو تاسې ایله دوه یا درې نشر کړئ، تاسې د صلیبیانو نه پیسې اخلئ او دا او هغه. او ډېر نور دوړه دباو یې هم وکړ. خیر مونږ پرېکړه وکړه چې ټول خبرونه به یې نشروو نو بیا یو چا ایمیل وکړ او وې ویل چې تاسې خو د طالبانو لپاره ډېره پروپاګنډه پیل کړې مونږ به درسره دا وکړو هغه به وکړو. مونږ ویل چې دا لا په کوم جنجال کې ګیر شو. نو په اخر کې مو هغه ایمیل ډاکټر حنیف ته ولېږلو چې ګوره صیبه ستا د لاسه خلک مونږ ته د مرګ ګواښونه کوي. هغه په ځواب کې راته ولیکل چې خیر دی که تاسو چا ووژلئ مونږ به مو بدل واخلو

په نوي ډیلي کې مو د موبایلونو لپاره سیمکارتونه اخیستل. افغانستان کې خو د داسې دوکانونو المارۍ د موبایلونو نه ډکې وي مګر د هغه د بتانو نه ډکې وې. دوکاندار ته مې ویل دا بتان هم خرڅوې؟ ویل نه دا خو زمونږ خدایان دي. ما ویل په دومره ډیرو څه کوې؟ ویل د هر کار لپاره یو جلا جلا خدای دی. ویل ټول خدایان دري دیرش ملیونه دي. ما ویل د سیمکارتونو والا پکې کوم یو دی؟ وې خندل ویل سیمکارتونو والا مو لا ندی جوړ کړی. بیا یې ما نه پوښتنه وکړه چې تاسو څومره خدایان لرئ. ما ویل شمېر یې راته ندی معلوم خو مونږ د هر کار لپاره دوه دوه خدایان لرو. د مکتبونو، روغتونونو او سرکونو د ورانولو او د خلکو د حلالولو خدایان ملا عمر او حکمتیار دي، د خلکو په سرونو د میښونو ټک وهلو او کانټینرونو کې د سوځولو خدایان دوستم او مزاري دي، په ښارونو د راکټونو ورولو خدایان احمدشاه مسعود او رباني دي، د رشوت او فساد خدایان حامد کرزی او احمد ولي دي، د منافقت او تنګ نظرۍ خورولو خدایان مجددي او سیاف دي. د تاریخي او کولتوري ارزښتونو د له منځه وړلو او د خلکو د خرڅولو خدایان قاضي حسین احمد او فضل الرحمان دي. هغه ویل دا خو ټول د شر خدایان دي. د خیر پکې کوم کوم دي؟ ما ورته وخندل. ویل مې تاسې به د سیمکاراتونو خدای جوړ کړئ خو مونږ به د خیر خدای بیا هم نه وي موندلی.