You people miss the point of the discussion completely except for Khostai.
A nation state that wants to be a strong nation state needs one identity.
The Afghan/Pashtun identity has already achieved to assimilate the non-Afgan/Pashtun ethnicities culturally.
The codes of Afghanyat are understood and lived by the Tajiks, Usbeks, Hazaras etc.
If we compare the Usbeks of Afghanistan and those of Usbekistan, we will see a huge difference.
If we compare the Tajiks of Afghanistan with the Tajiks of Tajikistan, it´s like comparing Russians withn Afghans.
Culturally, Pashtunization is almost complete.
Linguistically not.
The sole reason is that the founding fathers of modern day Afghanistan weren´t ideologically driven people with a Pashtun agenda.
Today minorities try to change the power balance of Afghanistan by trying to implement this narrative of "Farsi is a rich language, Ferdowsi-Rumi etc.".
Let me remind you people that nation states are not build around poets, philosophers or historians. It´s build around an identity that is shared by all.
Afghanyat/Pashtunwali is that identity and everyone who tries to undermine it with fabricated "Khorassan-e Buzurg" talk will achieve one thing: a civil war where you people end up on 10% of the soil in Badakhshan and cry for your lives.
Pashto is not just a language. Pashto is the core of an Afghan/Pashtun identity. "Doing Pashto", the cultural and ethical dimension of the language, is what we should talk about.
Comparing a Farsi, a non-indigenous language in Afghanistan (it originated in the Fars Sattrapi of the Persian Empire and is a WESTERN Iranian language) that replaced indigenous languages like Khwarezmi, Soghdian etc., with a culture is like comparing apples with oranges.
Pashto is the cultural backbone of our land.
Farsi is a language with rich history.
To give you an example:
Germanie´s kings and royal courts always prefered to talk in French untill 1848.
Germany didn´t unite because of poets and the richness of the German language; in fact German has never been a lingua franca or a internationally recognized language.
German was accepted by Dutch, Danish, Swedish, French, Polish, Russian etc. inhabitants of Germany because it was implemented wisely and effectivly as a uniting factor giving all the people in Germany one identity.
I don´t have a problem with Afghanistan being a multi-lingual country but Pashto is the national language. It´s the first official language and it´s what defines Afghanistan.
A nation state that wants to be a strong nation state needs one identity.
The Afghan/Pashtun identity has already achieved to assimilate the non-Afgan/Pashtun ethnicities culturally.
The codes of Afghanyat are understood and lived by the Tajiks, Usbeks, Hazaras etc.
If we compare the Usbeks of Afghanistan and those of Usbekistan, we will see a huge difference.
If we compare the Tajiks of Afghanistan with the Tajiks of Tajikistan, it´s like comparing Russians withn Afghans.
Culturally, Pashtunization is almost complete.
Linguistically not.
The sole reason is that the founding fathers of modern day Afghanistan weren´t ideologically driven people with a Pashtun agenda.
Today minorities try to change the power balance of Afghanistan by trying to implement this narrative of "Farsi is a rich language, Ferdowsi-Rumi etc.".
Let me remind you people that nation states are not build around poets, philosophers or historians. It´s build around an identity that is shared by all.
Afghanyat/Pashtunwali is that identity and everyone who tries to undermine it with fabricated "Khorassan-e Buzurg" talk will achieve one thing: a civil war where you people end up on 10% of the soil in Badakhshan and cry for your lives.
Pashto is not just a language. Pashto is the core of an Afghan/Pashtun identity. "Doing Pashto", the cultural and ethical dimension of the language, is what we should talk about.
Comparing a Farsi, a non-indigenous language in Afghanistan (it originated in the Fars Sattrapi of the Persian Empire and is a WESTERN Iranian language) that replaced indigenous languages like Khwarezmi, Soghdian etc., with a culture is like comparing apples with oranges.
Pashto is the cultural backbone of our land.
Farsi is a language with rich history.
To give you an example:
Germanie´s kings and royal courts always prefered to talk in French untill 1848.
Germany didn´t unite because of poets and the richness of the German language; in fact German has never been a lingua franca or a internationally recognized language.
German was accepted by Dutch, Danish, Swedish, French, Polish, Russian etc. inhabitants of Germany because it was implemented wisely and effectivly as a uniting factor giving all the people in Germany one identity.
I don´t have a problem with Afghanistan being a multi-lingual country but Pashto is the national language. It´s the first official language and it´s what defines Afghanistan.

Comment