dr najeeb speech on shah nawaz tanai

[MeemWawMeemNoon]

are you saying that Qadiyani wasnt in line with the British?

Yes.

[MeemWawMeemNoon]

Here's a question for MeemWawMeemNooonAlifLamSheenAlifTawAlifNoon


can an Afghan living in Pakistan condemn the actions of Pakistan while living in Pakistan?

Yes, but no uprising. He should leave. The land of Allah is vast.

[Toramana]

How can a true Afghan Patriiot work for the Hegemony of Mother Russia; it takes more than words to be a "Patriot". hehe

remember 1.5 Million Afghans died when he was active in Afghanistan. .......1.5 Million .....would a true Afghan patriot allow that?

No he was not working for the hegemony of Russia...He was rather defending Afghanistan sovereignty against the most brutal savages/apes who as a mercenary force were hell-bent to eradicate all symbols of Afghan sovreignty for the interests of their grand-pas i.e. the ISIs (and CIA as well).... (remember one Punjabi i.e. Akhtar Abur Rahman had told them Kabul must be burnt and that is what they did...)...

[MeemWawMeemNoon]

Well Look at the title of the thread?


Please your argument is circular; Najib helped to kill 1.5 Million Afghans, imagine the amount of general infrastructural destruction it would have created to kill 1.5 Million over 100,000. You act like things weren't already a mess. That would just be logically impossible given the magnitude of the Soviet Attrition and Najib's collaboration.

We can speculate about what would have happened; but Najib did the most damage.

you're nuts he was a truly good leader for allowing Russia to treat Afghanistan like it's property and kill and rape his own countrymen? You have some warped standards.

I give up with you. You are stuck on 1500000.

[ScimitarXEdge]

Basically in Qadiyani's view; selling your country to Russia and 1.5 Million Afghans dying in the process was "just a mistake" for Najib; but the Mujahideen fighting for Pakistan and Iran's strategic interests, where 100,000 is the most atrocious crime.

can we say this guy's brain is fried?

[graveyardofempires]

Yes, but no uprising. He should leave. The land of Allah is vast.

LOL


now get the hell out of here!!

you dont want to answer questions and talk illogical.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

So, is jihad against the US valid?

Per the defensive warfare doctrine, yes. However, once again, if you are attempting to allude to the fact that SX is sitting in the US and not fulfilling his obligation, that does not invalidate the requirement on others. The doctrine appears to apply rigidly to those within the confines of the invaded nation first and foremost with others becoming reserve soldiers that ought to activate. Once again, this is not an advocacy, but this is the proposedsunni theological doctrine.

[MeemWawMeemNoon]

Basically in Qadiyani's view; selling your country to Russia and 1.5 Million Afghans dying in the process was "just a mistake" for Najib; but the Mujahideen fighting for Pakistan and Iran's strategic interests, where 100,000 is the most atrocious crime.

can we say this guy's brain is fried?

[ScimitarXEdge]

No he was not working for the hegemony of Russia...He was rather defending Afghanistan sovereignty against the most brutal savages/apes who as a mercenary force were hell-bent to eradicate all symbols of Afghan sovreignty for the interests of their grand-pas i.e. the ISIs (and CIA as well).... (remember one Punjabi i.e. Akhtar Abur Rahman had told them Kabul must be burnt and that is what they did...)...

If he was not working for the Hegemony of Russia; why is it that the Russians were allowed by the Government he worked for and by his Agency to move freely in Afghanistan as if Afghanistan was their property?

How is allowing Russia the right to treat Afghanistan as it's property, defending Sovereignty?

You realize 1.5 Million Afghans died; while he was active right? So what's more brutal and please do answer, were the 100,000 deaths in the 90's by the Mujahideen more brutal or the 1.5 Million Afghan deaths more brutal?

Please explain to me why Najib allowed Russians to kill Afghans in weddings?

[MeemWawMeemNoon]

LOL


now get the hell out of here!!

you dont want to answer questions and talk illogical.

Islam does not allow uprisings against a state.

[ScimitarXEdge]

I give up with you. You are stuck on 1500000.

That's a PRETTY SIGNIFICANT THING TO BE stuck on, wouldm't you say?

[BarakzaiAbdali]

Yes, but no uprising. He should leave. The land of Allah is vast.

Once again, the inability of one person or even a million to not undertake a religious obligation doesnt not mean that the textual sense is spoilt. Its like saying: should everyone do wudhu before prayer? Sure. However, generally water waste is an issue with the American running faucet system... and there is a admonishment against waste. That doesnt negate someone going and doing wudhu in America.

[ScimitarXEdge]

Islam does not allow uprisings against a state.

where does it say that in the Qur'an?

[graveyardofempires]

Islam does not allow uprisings against a state.

spoken like a true qadiani slave

so you do believe Pashtuns were JINS?

[AnGaaR]

yaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

pa zaro gholo kai lasona ma wahay chei boi khaijei.. khawra pai wachaway (dont dig the old ****, just kill the smell by putting soil on it)





BTW DR. Najib ta chei tsok bad wayei no yawzal dai khpal pa graiwan kai wogori