Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghanistan should be renamed

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
    Pakistan means clean, but its not a clean country
    Afghan means pashtun but its not a pashtun country

    pakistan and afghanistan should be renamed to curruptistan
    Afghanistan compared to pakistan regarding corruption is an angel.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
      Pakistan means clean, but its not a clean country
      Afghan means pashtun but its not a pashtun country

      pakistan and afghanistan should be renamed to curruptistan
      not every Afghan is a pashtun
      but every pashtun is an Afghan

      GET USED TO IT

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
        Afghanistan compared to pakistan regarding corruption is an angel.

        i doubt that
        ----------

        *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

        Originally posted by Karachi
        like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

        Comment


        • #19
          Re the angel comparison, funny. Times have changed, unfortunately with this Western occupation.
          Well I hate to incur wrath.
          But I still like Khorasan. It's the prettiest name !
          Just think, no Westerners will ever be able to pronounce it right.
          So they will dismiss it from their Agendas...

          Why not make it tougher for them by saying Khorasan-Afghanistan?!!

          Ariana is next choice from my point of view but I doubt that will go over well, either.


          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
            i doubt that
            believe me its the truth
            when i crossed torkham the first thing was that a police took bribe from me about 1000 rupees.
            when in peshawer the police stand on the side of the road to take money from anyone riding with a taxi.

            and lets not even start with other provinces and moral corruption.
            even the guy who was to check my passport wanted to take 500 rupees from me,and this guy was lets say higher officer.

            in Afghanistan this is also starting but you cant compare it pakistan,maybe in 60 years.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Catya Sher View Post
              Re the angel comparison, funny. Times have changed, unfortunately with this Western occupation.
              Well I hate to incur wrath.
              But I still like Khorasan. It's the prettiest name !
              Just think, no Westerners will ever be able to pronounce it right.
              So they will dismiss it from their Agendas...

              Why not make it tougher for them by saying Khorasan-Afghanistan?!!

              Ariana is next choice from my point of view but I doubt that will go over well, either.


              i like khorasan as well and Afghanistan is also nice and Ariana as well.
              but i think its better to call it all these three.
              and as we can see we do have these names in Afghanistan,such as ariana Afghan airlines.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
                Afghanistan compared to pakistan regarding corruption is an angel.
                Afghanistan is 2nd while pakistan is 34th on corruption list, first is somalia.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                  Luffy you asked a simple question, its in the nature of these barbaric PF'ers to give animalistic replies
                  Look Manzaria! After the fall of Dhaka due to the popular uprising of Bengali nation the Western part of the erstwhile Pakistan lost even the justification to keep the remaining part as Pakistan. The independence of Bangaldesh invalidated the very premise on which Pakistan had been founded (though with the connivance of the British).

                  After that event West Pakistan must have refreshed its mandate to legitimize its existance since Pakistani was/is not a natural unit, it is a federation and federation requires the voluntary participation of the federating units, while the history of Pakistan shows that it occupied half of Afghan land in 1947 and the Qalat States Union, the Baloch historical land, in 1948.

                  So in my view let aside the issue of name, Pakistan's very existance has been turned illigitimate by the indepence of Bangaldesh for all the nations now trapped in Pakistan.
                  Last edited by khyaal; 01-03-2011, 05:31 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Luffy View Post
                    Afghanistan is 2nd while pakistan is 34th on corruption list, first is somalia.
                    says who?
                    you think i believe those warmongerers who wan to justify their occupation no matter what.and those corrupt individuals are their own men.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by khyaal View Post
                      Look Manzaria! After the fall of Dhaka due to the popular uprising of Bengali nation the Western part of the erstwhile Pakistan lost even the justification to keep the remaining part as Pakistan. The independence of Bangaldesh invalidated the very premise on which Pakistan had been founded (though with the connivance of the British).

                      After that event West Pakistan must have refreshed its mandate to legitimize its existance since Pakistani was/is not a natural unit, it is a federation and federation requires the voluntary participation of the federating units, while the history of Pakistan shows that it occupied half of Afghan land in 1947 and the Qalat States Union, the Baloch historical land, in 1948.

                      So in my view let aside the issue of name, Pakistan's very existance has been turned illigitimate by the indepence of Bangaldesh for all the nations now trapped in Pakistan.

                      whats that got to do with this thread?
                      ----------

                      *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                      Originally posted by Karachi
                      like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
                        not every Afghan is a pashtun
                        but every pashtun is an Afghan

                        GET USED TO IT

                        so the tajiks and uzbeks live in a foreigners land? after all they are not pashtun, but they live in "land of the pashtuns"

                        and yes i agree every pashtun is an afghan because the word afghan is synonymous with the word pashtun, however every pashtun doesnt belong in the current afghanistan
                        ----------

                        *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                        Originally posted by Karachi
                        like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                          whats that got to do with this thread?
                          Ok, I'll open a new thread.
                          Last edited by khyaal; 01-03-2011, 05:38 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                            so the tajiks and uzbeks live in a foreigners land? after all they are not pashtun, but they live in "land of the pashtuns"

                            and yes i agree every pashtun is an afghan because the word afghan is synonymous with the word pashtun, however every pashtun doesnt belong in the current afghanistan
                            those people call themselves Afghans even though they know it means pashtuns,so that speaks enough.

                            like i said get used to it

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
                              says who?
                              you think i believe those warmongerers who wan to justify their occupation no matter what.and those corrupt individuals are their own men.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                so you are giving me a link to a thread by YOU?

                                and the sources are from corrupt organizations.
                                its just to create a justification.
                                so according to you pakistan is not corrupt on all levels?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X