You want links?
Like the internet link that you provided with 0% relation to our topic?
There aren't any online sources as far as I know that lists the officers, their ranks and their ethnicities from 1945 to 1979.
I can understand your Setami rantings and your fear of "Pashtunization" but unfortunatly you fell the Setami rhetorics of your father.
Non-Pashtuns were involved in the army and were as patriotic as Pashtuns were.
Your arguements that the numbers were so low etc. are twisted and idiotic claims. 200 generals serve today in the Army?
I am not surprised......they have to give these NA-Besewad idiots ranks.
In a normal military, only division, battalion or chorps commanders, operational chiefs, chiefs of staff and leading personal in finances, education, construction and heads of departments were generals.
There weren't that many generals as today, my Khadist friend.
Like the internet link that you provided with 0% relation to our topic?
There aren't any online sources as far as I know that lists the officers, their ranks and their ethnicities from 1945 to 1979.
I can understand your Setami rantings and your fear of "Pashtunization" but unfortunatly you fell the Setami rhetorics of your father.
Non-Pashtuns were involved in the army and were as patriotic as Pashtuns were.
Your arguements that the numbers were so low etc. are twisted and idiotic claims. 200 generals serve today in the Army?
I am not surprised......they have to give these NA-Besewad idiots ranks.
In a normal military, only division, battalion or chorps commanders, operational chiefs, chiefs of staff and leading personal in finances, education, construction and heads of departments were generals.
There weren't that many generals as today, my Khadist friend.

Comment