Indian Sikhs begging to be 'Persian'

[toughpashtun]

Yeah. The Sikhs got lucky. If they had come at a time when the Pashtun lands weren't in civil war they wouldn't have been able to take an inch of Pashtun land.

We Pashtuns have lacked unity when it was most important,in history.Sadly.

[imazharyes]

i have question for users in these forum.

if Baloch and Afghans are aryans of central asia, how is true that many baloch in our pakistan looks like this here below going this place or that place.





and pashtunes are gypsy origin. this here how all pashtunes live before using donkeys and camels.





sorry i not believing baloch and pashtunes are aryans of central asia or related to Persians. i think they have origin gypsy.
can you explain me this Friends of the Dravidian Balochs?

Baloch and Pushtoon can be Iranians but not Central Asian. Central Asian people are predominantly Turkic which is lacking both in Baloch and majority of Pushtoons.

Sent from my S2 Pro using Tapatalk

[Kabulistan]

i have question for users in these forum.

if Baloch and Afghans are aryans of central asia, how is true that many baloch in our pakistan looks like this here below going this place or that place.





and pashtunes are gypsy origin. this here how all pashtunes live before using donkeys and camels.





sorry i not believing baloch and pashtunes are aryans of central asia or related to Persians. i think they have origin gypsy.
can you explain me this Friends of the Dravidian Balochs?

The only gypsies are Indians....thats the word for Indians who migrated from India to Europe...Dont be a selfhater...

Baloch are southern most population...along the coastlines near Persian Gulf/Indian Ocean, some have mixed with Black Africans, Arabs as well as Indians of Pakistan..the Lady in your pic looks African/Mixed with african/Indian...

In Afghanistan, Baluchs look more like other Afghanis:

[Nekrofrost]

Its posts like these and idiots like mungocherry that keep me hooked to this forum. This **** is hilarious.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

sore looser pashtunes haha.

The sore losers are those who overcompensate with stories like these.

[Elite Pakhtun]

That guy is Sikh and most likely this Paul Gill guy, he is all over the net

Man, you are illiterate. He says CLEARLY that he's a punjabi hindu.

[Karachi]

I have a question, why do a lot of women from that region, espeically older ones have oily hair like that? are they putting oil on it or is it natural. I really find this type of hair disgusting

[Friends of Baloch]

Seems that there is something very historical about Dravidian gypsies from Punjab having a fetish for 'Persians' and begging other people to view them as 'Iranian'.

It is also apparent that being from the Indian subcontinent, particularly Pakiland, has for 1000s of years been a stigma and viewed as a negative and inferior thing by peoples from other races.

Jinnah and the other smellies thought they were being cool by calling their British made 'Pakiland'. But no wonder after just a decade or so after Pakiland was invented that the term "Paki" came into existence as a slur and dirty word used against all subcontinentals. The very opposite meaning of the name these Dravidians chose for their 'state' by appropriating Persian words,

JĀT



"The Jāts are occasionally dubbed gypsy in ethnographic, historic, and travel accounts. In early post-Islamic Arabic historical records the Jāt are called Zoṭṭ and in the Persian and Arab worlds Jāt and Zoṭṭ are referred to as non-food-producing semi-nomadic people with Indian origins (Westphal-Hellbusch, 1984, p. 356), irrespective of their own claims for ethnic or linguistic identity. There are sizeable communities of settled and nomadic Jāts numbering several millions in India and Pakistan, about which we have a limited ethnographic and historical record (Berland; Bingley; Dahiya; Pande; Pradhan; Qanungo). The present article deals with the Jāts of Afghanistan, a heterogeneous ethnic group that consists of several non-food-producing nomadic and semi-nomadic communities, each calling itself by a distinct descent and/or occupational autonym.


The label Qaw(w)āl is occasionally used interchangeably with the exonym Jāt in Afghanistan. The overlapping social categories Jāt and Qawāl in Afghanistan carry pejorative connotations. No one wants to be identified as Jāt or Qawāl. As such, these two labels do not analytically qualify as ethnonyms but are references to ethnic or social categories to which no one wants to belong. In Afghan popular culture, argumentative and quarrelsome behavior, including careless and carefree speech and dress, especially among young women, is characterized as Jāt behavior. All peripatetic communities reject the label Jāt but apply it to other communities in the larger Jāt ethnic universe. For example, a sub-group of the Jāt called Pikrāj will reject being called Jāt but will assign the label to other sub-groups of the larger Jāt category."


. . .


"Aparna Rao (2004) lists four general features of the Jāt noted by outsiders to differentiate them from other nomadic and semi-nomadic communities in Afghanistan: (1) They lived in houses in urban areas and in white tents when they lived in rural areas and, in contrast to the black goat’s hair tents of the pastoral nomads, in white tents when they lived in rural areas; (2) they were collectively known as outsiders with Indian origins even though a Jāt community itself, as in the case of the Ḡorbat, would claim Iranian roots; (3) they were considered both physically and ritually unclean and associated with undesirable and polluting occupations of feeding on carrion and corpses, bloodletting, prostitution, pimping, and child-abduction; (4) their small and dark physical features validated their Indian, non-Afghan, origins."


. . .


"The Ḡorbat claim Iranian origin despite outsiders’ insistence that they are originally from India."


JĀT – Encyclopaedia Iranica

[UnknownUser]

Punjabies could be legit partially descended from Persians....

i am not entirely sure of this people belongning to India...Punjabis could be an Indianized people....

[Charsi Malang]

Seems that there is something very historical about Dravidian gypsies from Punjab having a fetish for 'Persians' and begging other people to view them as 'Iranian'.

It is also apparent that being from the Indian subcontinent, particularly Pakiland, has for 1000s of years been a stigma and viewed as a negative and inferior thing by peoples from other races.

Jinnah and the other smellies thought they were being cool by calling their British made 'Pakiland'. But no wonder after just a decade or so after Pakiland was invented that the term "Paki" came into existence as a slur and dirty word used against all subcontinentals. The very opposite meaning of the name these Dravidians chose for their 'state' by appropriating Persian words,

JĀT



"The Jāts are occasionally dubbed gypsy in ethnographic, historic, and travel accounts. In early post-Islamic Arabic historical records the Jāt are called Zoṭṭ and in the Persian and Arab worlds Jāt and Zoṭṭ are referred to as non-food-producing semi-nomadic people with Indian origins (Westphal-Hellbusch, 1984, p. 356), irrespective of their own claims for ethnic or linguistic identity. There are sizeable communities of settled and nomadic Jāts numbering several millions in India and Pakistan, about which we have a limited ethnographic and historical record (Berland; Bingley; Dahiya; Pande; Pradhan; Qanungo). The present article deals with the Jāts of Afghanistan, a heterogeneous ethnic group that consists of several non-food-producing nomadic and semi-nomadic communities, each calling itself by a distinct descent and/or occupational autonym.


The label Qaw(w)āl is occasionally used interchangeably with the exonym Jāt in Afghanistan. The overlapping social categories Jāt and Qawāl in Afghanistan carry pejorative connotations. No one wants to be identified as Jāt or Qawāl. As such, these two labels do not analytically qualify as ethnonyms but are references to ethnic or social categories to which no one wants to belong. In Afghan popular culture, argumentative and quarrelsome behavior, including careless and carefree speech and dress, especially among young women, is characterized as Jāt behavior. All peripatetic communities reject the label Jāt but apply it to other communities in the larger Jāt ethnic universe. For example, a sub-group of the Jāt called Pikrāj will reject being called Jāt but will assign the label to other sub-groups of the larger Jāt category."


. . .


"Aparna Rao (2004) lists four general features of the Jāt noted by outsiders to differentiate them from other nomadic and semi-nomadic communities in Afghanistan: (1) They lived in houses in urban areas and in white tents when they lived in rural areas and, in contrast to the black goat’s hair tents of the pastoral nomads, in white tents when they lived in rural areas; (2) they were collectively known as outsiders with Indian origins even though a Jāt community itself, as in the case of the Ḡorbat, would claim Iranian roots; (3) they were considered both physically and ritually unclean and associated with undesirable and polluting occupations of feeding on carrion and corpses, bloodletting, prostitution, pimping, and child-abduction; (4) their small and dark physical features validated their Indian, non-Afghan, origins."


. . .


"The Ḡorbat claim Iranian origin despite outsiders’ insistence that they are originally from India."


JĀT – Encyclopaedia Iranica

Gems brother

[Friends of Baloch]

Gems brother

It confirms that the punjabi inferiority complex is ancient.

The Jats and other stinkers that are today known as "punjabis" are truly a race of Dalit Indians. Their own people view them as "low castes" in Hindu society and foreigners equally reviled them throughout history.

Must really suck to be a "punjabi".

[mungojerry]

It confirms that the punjabi inferiority complex is ancient.

The Jats and other stinkers that are today known as "punjabis" are truly a race of Dalit Indians. Their own people view them as "low castes" in Hindu society and foreigners equally reviled them throughout history.

Must really suck to be a "punjabi".

ok Dravidian.

i feel sure you look same like these high caste Aryan Hindus.

[Friends of Baloch]

These Dravidians never tire of telling lies, do they?

Maybe this "Karachi wala" is PF resident 'Karachi'?

You can see in this person that there is not a drop of anything 'Persian' in this fool or his family when you see him.

[Kakar-Wardak]

These Dravidians never tire of telling lies, do they?

Maybe this "Karachi wala" is PF resident 'Karachi'?

You can see in this person that there is not a drop of anything 'Persian' in this fool or his family when you see him.

Their hatred for Hindus will never allow them to accept the reality of Their Hindu grandfather's lol.

Btw does the word Hindu mean slave in Persian?

[Kakar-Wardak]

The funniest thing I read about these infidel hairbags is that the person who reads their Holybook is called a GRUNTHI, I almost fell off my chair when I Read that, As if bujy and Pijja was not enough lol.