Originally posted by Samandri
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Proof that Karachi Who Now Insults Pashtuns as "Bacha Baz" is a Pashtun wannabe.
Collapse
X
-
they switch roles between catcher and pitcher.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
-
So you was once proud pakhtun and suddenly Tajik who are notorious for bacha bazi as well. If anything tajiks are more of bachas then bacha baz if you know what I meanOriginally posted by Karachi View PostEveryone does (fitting in) when they go some where new, whether it is a new forum or a new country, later on things change, once they find out the truth, samething happend with me, I didn't know about the Bacha Bazi aspect of Pashtun culture back then, If I knew this, I would have never made that post
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lalukhet View PostSo you was once proud pakhtun and suddenly Tajik who are notorious for bacha bazi as well. If anything tajiks are more of bachas then bacha baz if you know what I mean
where did I claim to be Tajik? I clearly said I am 100% Indian, the reason I am saying Tajik is already stated, Tajik themselves are mixed with Turkic, you can see that in their faces. The people who came to India were from Tajikistan and western Afghanistan and Pashtuns had very little influence, this is what I am saying
Comment
-
Originally posted by Samandri View PostWhats your relationship with Tarek Fateh? object or subject?
I dont agree with everything he says, the thing with him is, he only criticizes muslims and Pakistanis and gives no solutions to fix the problems, I think people should criticize, but also give solutions at the same time
Comment
-
Tajiks are clearly mixed with Turkics, they have always been very close and intermarried, it is hard to tell who is Tajik or turkic, they spoke farsi/dari too, they are pretty much the sameOriginally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostEven if that were so, which is actually inaccurate. They were not Tajiks.
Comment
-
Tajiks mixed with Turkic is a Tajik mixed with Turkic. Turkic is Turkic.Originally posted by Karachi View PostTajiks are clearly mixed with Turkics, they have always been very close and intermarried, it is hard to tell who is Tajik or turkic, they spoke farsi/dari too, they are pretty much the same
You sound desperate.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Karachi is trying to use Tajiks as verbal human shields, pathetic.Originally posted by Win Butler View PostQuit bringing Tajiks into these Pashtun-Desi feuds. You make yourselves look like fools.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
That is true for many regions but not so much for others. Don't generalize and act like you're an expert just because these guys have you cornered.Originally posted by Karachi View PostTajiks are clearly mixed with Turkics, they have always been very close and intermarried, it is hard to tell who is Tajik or turkic, they spoke farsi/dari too, they are pretty much the same
Even some Tajiks from Tajikistan and Pashtuns from Pakistan are pretty close genetically.
Comment
-
I don't think anything more needs to be said after this lolOriginally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostThere's a difference between fitting in naturally, or fitting in because you're trying to appease other people. If you just happened to fit in because of who you are, that's just who you are. If you're TRYING TO FIT in it says a lot about your character. I can understand a 10 year old who maybe learning to develop an identity might be doing that. but you're already a grown up, that's a personality trait.
To me what it says about you is that you're a chameleon. Who knows if you even evolved as you said? You might have been as you are all along but wanted to fool everyone to "fit in" until you knew the time was right to be your real self. This is sociopathic behavior.
----------
*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Originally posted by Karachilike I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here
Comment
-
Originally posted by Win Butler View PostThat is true for many regions but not so much for others. Don't generalize and act like you're an expert just because these guys have you cornered.
Even some Tajiks from Tajikistan and Pashtuns from Pakistan are pretty close genetically.
Ok tell me one thing, why did the language Dari played a major role in south asia, yet Pashto did not? I might be wrong about central asia and it's history/dynamics, and how things played there, I am not central asian, however one thing I am right about is that Pashtuns played very little role in south asia intellectually, they were only famous for their raids of Lahore, Delhi etc... I personally believe that dari/farsi speakers have always been more intellectual, because just look at the history of central asia itself, it is dominated by Dari/Farsi speakers, all the scholars for example etc...Last edited by Karachi; 08-28-2016, 04:22 PM.
Comment
-
Doing something just to fit in means you are a FRAUD. Right or wrong?? I new this guy was a Fraud soon as he made that thread about his imaginary trip to the carribean.. The one were he couldn't provide a non-Google image of even just the sand or water lol fraud just like the fraudsters in Karachi.----------
*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Originally posted by Karachilike I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here
Comment
-
Originally posted by Manzareh View PostDoing something just to fit in means you are a FRAUD. Right or wrong?? I new this guy was a Fraud soon as he made that thread about his imaginary trip to the carribean.. The one were he couldn't provide a non-Google image of even just the sand or water lol fraud just like the fraudsters in Karachi.
why is it so hard for you to believe a Canadian person can travel to Caribbean? you do know that it is pretty cheap to go there enjoy the Islands. One person can go for a week for $600
Also no, fitting in means, that you are just trying to fit in, it is a innocent actLast edited by Karachi; 08-28-2016, 05:27 PM.
Comment
-
Pretending to be something you're not just so others will accept you is an innocent act - Says every self hating Indic with an inferiority complex. Trying to fit in is only innocent when you're 10. Also, it's not that you're Canadian, it's that you used stock photos for your made-up honey moon.Originally posted by Karachi View Postwhy is it so hard for you to believe a Canadian person can travel to Caribbean? you do know that it is pretty cheap to go there enjoy the Islands. One person can go for a week for $600
Also no, fitting in means, that you are just trying to fit in, it is a innocent act
Considering that we've just proven what a huge self hating loser you are. I imagine your honey-moon was more just you with fake palm trees in your living room. Cozied up to your blow up doll.
Karachi's Real "Honey Moon"
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Your rupee was created by a Pashtun.Originally posted by Karachi View PostThe so called Turkic Dynasties of India came from present day Tajikistan and western Afghanistan, this is well known in academia, they had the most influence in India, not Pashtuns. Mughals were of course related to Mongols/Turks, nothing to with Pashtuns. Most Pashtuns were raiders of India and they never built anything or contributed anything
Like I told you earlier, it's because the Pashtuns were highly Persianized. Dari has a lot of influence not because of Tajiks, but because of the Persianized Pashtun and Turkic dynasties in India; not a single Tajik dynasty ruled over India.Originally posted by Karachi View PostOk tell me one thing, why did the language Dari played a major role in south asia, yet Pashto did not? I might be wrong about central asia and it's history/dynamics, and how things played there, I am not central asian, however one thing I am right about is that Pashtuns played very little role in south asia intellectually, they were only famous for their raids of Lahore, Delhi etc... I personally believe that dari/farsi speakers have always been more intellectual, because just look at the history of central asia itself, it is dominated by Dari/Farsi speakers, all the scholars for example etc...Last edited by Aryana; 08-28-2016, 06:29 PM."If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"
Comment

Comment