Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Offensive Signatures/Avatars/Quotes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Talal View Post
    c'mon guys, none of us have done anything wrong to each other so there is no reason to hate. We are fighting over something that is beyond control, there is no sense in that
    Beyond control? what you think we live in a cast society and just accept things because you say so. lol

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post
      One thing must be very clear, you must treat others the way you want to be treated by them. Many nations have killed millions of each other still an enemy of today is a friend of tomorrow. Pakistan might have committed mistakes and it may be even committing those mistakes right now again and again but what if there is Pakistan without mistakes. The conflict arises between us on this one single point, many want Pakistan vanished and I want the mistakes vanished.

      I have respect for each and everyone's point of view and yes there should be a limit .. Else we should write here that those who don't agree with this particular agenda should not join in as there is no room for such people.
      A mistake is when you accidentally do something, such as treading on someones toes, or bumping into someone on the street.

      All inexcusable and done with no malace.

      When your beloved army institutionally dehumanizes, tortures and executes a particular race and actively pushes propaganda (see the latest army documentary programmes) then it is not a mistake but its apartheid.

      You see pashtuns treated as second class citizens but you won't complain, only when it happens to your family/relatives - only then will people like you wake up . Your level of selfish concern is worrying.

      Comment


      • #33
        Khushala, We have discussed this signature of mine at times. Why you keep dragging things again and again in separate topics and the readers may become confuse

        Now coming to the point..

        In this quotation I agree with you the original term used was Afghan and that term pointed towards ethnic Afghans i.e., Pakhtuns/Pashtuns. Right?
        Now If you ask me that whether em an Afghan or not? I will reply ethnically I am an Afghan but not nationally. I belong to Pakistan hence in today's world I am a Pakistani. Similarly a non-pakhtun person living in Afghanistan is an Afghan. So there is nothing wrong in calling ethnic Afghans as Pakhtuns/Pashtuns.

        Manana..
        yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post
          Khushala, We have discussed this signature of mine at times. Why you keep dragging things again and again in separate topics and the readers may become confuse

          Now coming to the point..

          In this quotation I agree with you the original term used was Afghan and that term pointed towards ethnic Afghans i.e., Pakhtuns/Pashtuns. Right?
          Now If you ask me that whether em an Afghan or not? I will reply ethnically I am an Afghan but not nationally. I belong to Pakistan hence in today's world I am a Pakistani. Similarly a non-pakhtun person living in Afghanistan is an Afghan. So there is nothing wrong in calling ethnic Afghans as Pakhtuns/Pashtuns.

          Manana..
          that still doesnt explain why you are having a signature which i shistorically incorrect.It is highly offensive.

          Comment


          • #35
            TAKARAY shay.........AWojay da AWAY moor zaman
            .....


            Comment


            • #36
              GOE:

              If you will read my post carefully, you will find out the reason behind it!!
              yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post
                GOE:

                If you will read my post carefully, you will find out the reason behind it!!
                thats an excuse

                the Quote you are using isnt talking about pakistanis but Afghans,i dont know why you dragged pakistan into this.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
                  thats an excuse

                  the Quote you are using isnt talking about pakistanis but Afghans,i dont know why you dragged pakistan into this.

                  Now that's something you call Joke of the century!!

                  Ok tell me Afghans/Pashtuns/Pakhtuns are different words for same ethnic group right? So what if I replace these words?
                  yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Shehbaz yu qadam rusta sha khair Grave mashar ror sam waye

                    awo Grave rora ta yu qadam rusta sha walay chay Shahbaz Mashom da

                    warukay ror da keday shi chay sta pa shan amture na wi zka

                    mannnnnnnnna ba wi
                    .....


                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post
                      Now that's something you call Joke of the century!!

                      Ok tell me Afghans/Pashtuns/Pakhtuns are different words for same ethnic group right? So what if I replace these words?
                      if that is the joke of the century than you are the laughing stoke of the century.Changing the word is not the case here but your reason for it.
                      you dont dare to call yourself Afghan but are eager to steal a quote which is about Afghans/Pukhtane.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post
                        Khushala, We have discussed this signature of mine at times. Why you keep dragging things again and again in separate topics and the readers may become confuse

                        Now coming to the point..

                        In this quotation I agree with you the original term used was Afghan and that term pointed towards ethnic Afghans i.e., Pakhtuns/Pashtuns. Right?
                        Now If you ask me that whether em an Afghan or not? I will reply ethnically I am an Afghan but not nationally. I belong to Pakistan hence in today's world I am a Pakistani. Similarly a non-pakhtun person living in Afghanistan is an Afghan. So there is nothing wrong in calling ethnic Afghans as Pakhtuns/Pashtuns.

                        Manana..
                        You are wrong, Only the Pashtuns are Afghan. Tajiks, hazara, etc are nationals of Afghanistan. everyone in Afghanistan knows when people talk about Afghans, they are talking about Pashtuns.
                        You intention of changing the quote is part of a panjabi campaign to divide the Afghans. Nobody here is stupid, everyone is aware of whats going on.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          More conspiracy theories. I could only wish the punjos were so united in any cause.

                          Shahbaz is a Pakistani Afghan to some, Pakistani Pashtun to others and a Pakistani Punjabized Pathan to brain dead individuals. Notice that Pakistani shows up in all, since it's a nationality. It's not that hard to comprehend.

                          Question, what would you call a tajik in afghanistan? Just tajik? Afghanistani? Afghan? Tajikistani? What about a punjabi?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            This is my point a Tajik living in Afghanistan is an Afghan That's simple no that much hard to understand. Nothing left to argue about Khushaala .. Re-Read you will understand
                            yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Pakistan rules. Afghans are Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Hazaras. While Pashtun are pakistani's. Afghanistan sold Pashtuns out.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
                                if that is the joke of the century than you are the laughing stoke of the century.Changing the word is not the case here but your reason for it.
                                you dont dare to call yourself Afghan but are eager to steal a quote which is about Afghans/Pukhtane.

                                That's again a Joke my dear. How come you know that I don't call myself an Afghan? LOL, I am not that much bad boy to be ashamed of my ethnic identity .. Infact in every document til now that I filled for Education/Non-Education puposes especially non-education purposes I always wrote the word AFGHAN in the column of cast. So you better don't dare to say that I don't care about this ethnic identity of mine .. Hela laram che khabara ba di na pas na wrandi behas gunjaish na lari .. Manana
                                yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X