So are we all going forget about Aryana I guess.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Afghanistan part of ancient India
Collapse
X
-
Indian. Nationalists claim aryana as their province' since they claim to follow arya role religionOriginally posted by Afghanfootball View PostSo are we all going forget about Aryana I guess."I bow to no one, except ALLAH. I dont bow to punjabay, do not bow to kabulay and afghanay, do not bow to faujay and mullay, do not bow to asfandyarwalay and petty khanays...i am traitor to all of them." - Smartay
Comment
-
Chapter 2.
"NEXT to India is Ariana, the first portion of the country subject to the Persians, lying beyond the Indus, and the first [120] of the higher satrapies without the Taurus. On the north it is bounded by the same mountains as India, on the south by the same sea, and by the same river Indus, which separates it from India. It stretches thence towards the west as far as the line drawn from the Caspian Gates to Carmania, whence its figure is quadrilateral."
Comment
-
Originally posted by tilla_jogian View PostThere is cline starting from Afghanistan to South India. So called R1a is very common among Afghanis, Pakis and North west indians like Occupied Kashmiris and punjabis. Y-dna H1a* which is south indian tribal origin have low frequency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But it shows even South Indian tribals were assimilated.
To get deep in to differences from Afghanistan to South India one need genetic automosal results and not Y-dna. But that only apply to east afghanis in bordering region of Pakistan. Rest of Afghanistan cline has been ****ed up by mongols and now they belong to different category in terms of genetics.
So mongol like afghani pashtun will still be pashtun but will not cluster genetically with paki pashtun without mongol ancestry. So these genetics automosal results can also be drastically changend in few generations.
check out
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...rive_web#gid=6
No Journal references? .....You're disqualified. I don't take suit in random websites. Peer Reviewed work only.
Comment
-
why are you making stuff up? just look at your spreadsheets, the afghan pashtuns or pashtun/tajiks are more west eurasian than eastern and pakistani pashtuns. they score higher caucasian and north european/lower south indian and cluster to the west of south asians. how does that make them mongols?!Originally posted by tilla_jogian View PostThere is cline starting from Afghanistan to South India. So called R1a is very common among Afghanis, Pakis and North west indians like Occupied Kashmiris and punjabis. Y-dna H1a* which is south indian tribal origin have low frequency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But it shows even South Indian tribals were assimilated.
To get deep in to differences from Afghanistan to South India one need genetic automosal results and not Y-dna. But that only apply to east afghanis in bordering region of Pakistan. Rest of Afghanistan cline has been ****ed up by mongols and now they belong to different category in terms of genetics.
So mongol like afghani pashtun will still be pashtun but will not cluster genetically with paki pashtun without mongol ancestry. So these genetics automosal results can also be drastically changend in few generations.
check out
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...rive_web#gid=6Last edited by Pishdad; 05-03-2015, 04:37 PM.
Comment
-
they say aryana mean aryan and aryan are hindu, they say aryana is province of their "bharat varsha", they want Hindu Shahis back in powerOriginally posted by Afghanfootball View Postwell than they're ****ing idiots. Many historians have said that there was persia, aryana, and india."I bow to no one, except ALLAH. I dont bow to punjabay, do not bow to kabulay and afghanay, do not bow to faujay and mullay, do not bow to asfandyarwalay and petty khanays...i am traitor to all of them." - Smartay
Comment
-
Why is being called 'Indian' or 'Hindu' considered an insult? So what if some of our ancestors were Hindus or Buddhists? There are people in Afghanistan and Pakistan now who are Hindus. Does that make them worthy of less respect than their Muslim neighbors? Do you all think you're 'better' than Indians? If so, then that is quite sickening.
Comment
-
only to pakistanis it is insult, which is weird since most of them had hindu ancestors and in fact even today many of their last names are of hindu originsOriginally posted by Zarim View PostWhy is being called 'Indian' or 'Hindu' considered an insult? So what if some of our ancestors were Hindus or Buddhists? There are people in Afghanistan and Pakistan now who are Hindus. Does that make them worthy of less respect than their Muslim neighbors? Do you all think you're 'better' than Indians? If so, then that is quite sickening.
Comment
-
afghan use hindu as a derogatary term idiot, they mock pakistanis with it insinuating it's badOriginally posted by Karachi View Postonly to pakistanis it is insult, which is weird since most of them had hindu ancestors and in fact even today many of their last names are of hindu origins"I bow to no one, except ALLAH. I dont bow to punjabay, do not bow to kabulay and afghanay, do not bow to faujay and mullay, do not bow to asfandyarwalay and petty khanays...i am traitor to all of them." - Smartay
Comment
-
You are not paying attention, check tajik results again. These pashtuns are from east/south afghanistan border regions thats why low chenghez khan.Originally posted by Pishdad View Postwhy are you making stuff up? just look at your spreadsheets, the afghan pashtuns or pashtun/tajiks are more west eurasian than eastern and pakistani pashtuns. they score higher caucasian and north european/lower south indian and cluster to the west of south asians. how does that make them mongols?!
Or check this out
http://www.harappadna.org/2014/01/afghan-dataset/
Mongols have ****ed up cline.Best post in PF history
[I]
''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar
Comment
-
Ok doubleLast edited by tilla_jogian; 05-03-2015, 08:02 PM.Best post in PF history
[I]
''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar
Comment
-
Just south/east afghani pashtuns not tajiks pishab sir. Check out pure tajik results, they score even more mongol. Only half breed tajiks/pashtuns score lower mongol but still higher then afghanis in extreme east and south.Originally posted by Pishdad View Postwhy are you making stuff up? just look at your spreadsheets, the afghan pashtuns or pashtun/tajiks are more west eurasian than eastern and pakistani pashtuns. they score higher caucasian and north european/lower south indian and cluster to the west of south asians. how does that make them mongols?!
http://www.harappadna.org/2014/01/afghan-dataset/
There used to be consistant cline which now is broken thanks to Chenghez Khan. Now that cline start from Hindu Kush to South India. Before central asia used to be part of it. Reason is Pakistan region survived Mongol invasions.
In fact ancient Pakistanis resistance to mongols is legendary, read more about it.Best post in PF history
[I]
''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar
Comment
-
Does anyone else notice that Tilla_Jogian isn't posting information from a reputable, qualified journal that's been peer reviewed?
Wonder why that is?
Also Tilla_Jogian makes faulty correlation, Y-chromsomal DNA founder effect stretches back thousands of years, prior to Changiz Khan's time. Checkmate?
Comment

Comment