Tweet
The persains relate every great pashtun to be their own.
They are liers and pashtun haters.
The persains are more dangerous to pashtuns when it comes to the language,history and origin of our people.
For example the Ghuris were pashtuns and belong to the suri and Ghilzai tribes.The suris are also part of Ghilzia tribe.
Sultan shahbudeen muhammad ghori was belong to the suri tribe and this bs written bellow by persain historain says he was persain.At the sametime they identify him to belong to the suri tribe in this article what a mistake by these liers.
read pls,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Muhammad of Ghor
Muizz-ud-din Muhammad bin SāmSultan of the Ghorid Empire
Sultan Shahab-ud-din Muhammad Ghori
سلطان شہاب الدین محمد غوریReign1202–1206Born1150BirthplaceGhor, present-day AfghanistanDiedMarch 15, 1206Place of deathDamiak, Jhelum District, present-day PakistanBuriedDamik, Jhelum District, present-day PakistanPredecessorGhiyāṣ-ud-din Muhammad bin SāmSuccessorQutbuddin AibakSultan Shahāb-ud-Din Muhammad Ghori (also spelled Ghauri, Ghouri) (Persian: سلطان شہاب الدین محمد غوری), originally called Mu'izzuddīn Muḥammad Bin Sām (and also referred to by Orientalists as Muhammad of Ghor and famously known as just Ghori) (1150 – March 15, 1206), was one of the rulers of the Ghurid dynasty from the famous house of Sur who were rulers of Ghor for five hundred years. He is credited with laying the foundation of Islamic occupation in India that lasted for several centuries. He reigned over a territory spanning present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India.
Muiz-ud-din, son of Sam Suri, nicknamed Shahab-ud-din which means "The (Flashing) Fire of Religion (Islam)" took the city of Ghazni in 1173 to avenge the death of his ancestor Muhammad Suri at the hands of Mahmud of Ghazni and used it as a launching-pad for expansion into northern India.[1] In the meantime, he assisted his brother Ghiyasuddin in his contest with the Khwarezmid Empire for the lordship of Khorāsān in Western Asia. In 1175 Ghori captured Multan from the Hamid Ludi dynasty which was also Pashtun but were alleged to be un-Islamic on the account of their association with Ismailite Shi'iate sect and also took Uch in 1175. He also annexed the Ghaznavid principality of Lahore in 1186, the last haven of his Afghan but Non-Pashtun Persianized rivals.[1] After the death of Ghiyasuddin in 1202, he became the successor of the Ghurid Empire and ruled until his assassination in 1206 near Jhelum in modern-day Pakistan.[citation needed]
A confused struggle then ensued among the remaining Ghūrid leaders, and the Khwarezmids were able to take over the Ghūrids' empire in about 1215. Though the Ghūrids' empire was short-lived and petty Ghurid Suri states remained in power until the arrival of Timurids, Shahabuddin Ghori's conquests laid the foundations of Muslim rule in India. Qutb-ud-din Aibak, a former slave (Mamluk) of Muhammad Ghori, was the first sultan of Delhi.
In the start of this article the persain evil called him persain and not pashtun.If he was suri then how come he become persain because suri is a pashtun tribe.
Sometime these evil persains called him turk just because they do,nt like these great men to be called pashtun of origin.
Today ,s Ghor and Bamian provinces were the homes of suri,ghilzai and kakar pashtuns till the time of mongol invasion.
The tajik,aimak and hazaras settled in the region later on.The hazaras came from mongolia and the persains from the then khurasan region of today,s iran.
According to some pashtun historians pashtun originated from Ghor later on moved to the sulaiman mountains.This is another long discussion.
EVEN if pashtuns are not originated from the Ghor,Ghor and Bamian are the historicle home of pashtun people and not persian.
They should clearly write pashtun in the start of article and not persio.
Not just this one .They have written books and article called them persains and not pashtuns.
They are liers and pashtun haters.
The persains are more dangerous to pashtuns when it comes to the language,history and origin of our people.
For example the Ghuris were pashtuns and belong to the suri and Ghilzai tribes.The suris are also part of Ghilzia tribe.
Sultan shahbudeen muhammad ghori was belong to the suri tribe and this bs written bellow by persain historain says he was persain.At the sametime they identify him to belong to the suri tribe in this article what a mistake by these liers.
read pls,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Muhammad of Ghor
Muizz-ud-din Muhammad bin SāmSultan of the Ghorid Empire
Sultan Shahab-ud-din Muhammad Ghori
سلطان شہاب الدین محمد غوریReign1202–1206Born1150BirthplaceGhor, present-day AfghanistanDiedMarch 15, 1206Place of deathDamiak, Jhelum District, present-day PakistanBuriedDamik, Jhelum District, present-day PakistanPredecessorGhiyāṣ-ud-din Muhammad bin SāmSuccessorQutbuddin AibakSultan Shahāb-ud-Din Muhammad Ghori (also spelled Ghauri, Ghouri) (Persian: سلطان شہاب الدین محمد غوری), originally called Mu'izzuddīn Muḥammad Bin Sām (and also referred to by Orientalists as Muhammad of Ghor and famously known as just Ghori) (1150 – March 15, 1206), was one of the rulers of the Ghurid dynasty from the famous house of Sur who were rulers of Ghor for five hundred years. He is credited with laying the foundation of Islamic occupation in India that lasted for several centuries. He reigned over a territory spanning present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India.
Muiz-ud-din, son of Sam Suri, nicknamed Shahab-ud-din which means "The (Flashing) Fire of Religion (Islam)" took the city of Ghazni in 1173 to avenge the death of his ancestor Muhammad Suri at the hands of Mahmud of Ghazni and used it as a launching-pad for expansion into northern India.[1] In the meantime, he assisted his brother Ghiyasuddin in his contest with the Khwarezmid Empire for the lordship of Khorāsān in Western Asia. In 1175 Ghori captured Multan from the Hamid Ludi dynasty which was also Pashtun but were alleged to be un-Islamic on the account of their association with Ismailite Shi'iate sect and also took Uch in 1175. He also annexed the Ghaznavid principality of Lahore in 1186, the last haven of his Afghan but Non-Pashtun Persianized rivals.[1] After the death of Ghiyasuddin in 1202, he became the successor of the Ghurid Empire and ruled until his assassination in 1206 near Jhelum in modern-day Pakistan.[citation needed]
A confused struggle then ensued among the remaining Ghūrid leaders, and the Khwarezmids were able to take over the Ghūrids' empire in about 1215. Though the Ghūrids' empire was short-lived and petty Ghurid Suri states remained in power until the arrival of Timurids, Shahabuddin Ghori's conquests laid the foundations of Muslim rule in India. Qutb-ud-din Aibak, a former slave (Mamluk) of Muhammad Ghori, was the first sultan of Delhi.
In the start of this article the persain evil called him persain and not pashtun.If he was suri then how come he become persain because suri is a pashtun tribe.
Sometime these evil persains called him turk just because they do,nt like these great men to be called pashtun of origin.
Today ,s Ghor and Bamian provinces were the homes of suri,ghilzai and kakar pashtuns till the time of mongol invasion.
The tajik,aimak and hazaras settled in the region later on.The hazaras came from mongolia and the persains from the then khurasan region of today,s iran.
According to some pashtun historians pashtun originated from Ghor later on moved to the sulaiman mountains.This is another long discussion.
EVEN if pashtuns are not originated from the Ghor,Ghor and Bamian are the historicle home of pashtun people and not persian.
They should clearly write pashtun in the start of article and not persio.
Not just this one .They have written books and article called them persains and not pashtuns.
Comment