Originally posted by unknownprince
View Post
The other route is via a systems based approach to how the medical systems across the world work. Most folks who do it this way go and get an MPH, a masters of public health. It appears that this degree allows folks to emphasize on how to change and adapt medical systems.
Regarding being a statistic, I think life is about being content. My point is that politics is a dirty field in that it has some factual bases, some personal vandetta, and a whole lot of opinion thrown in. In the scheme of the universe which is aged beyond billions of years, our life span is so short, more like a spark than even a flame. I understand the need that man has that can be typified by Alexander's statement to his mother when he heard that his father Philip of Macedon had conquered a new kingdom, he cried: "My father shall conquer the whole of the world and leave me nothing!"
However, We physicians wear the white coat because we do our best to present ourselves to the patient as being "speen lamaan" in a way, or utterly approachable despite their political dispostion, religious ideology, hatred towards our race or love of it, whether they are killers or saviours. Political views ought not to cloud how we care for a patient.
This reminds me of an anecdotal situation: I had a good solid friend of mine who comes from a small town in the midwest. He is a methodist white American guy who worked hard and is currently and orthopedic surgeon. We have been friends for years, even before medical school. He interviewed at a southern school and was asked what is generally seen as an illegal question to ask regarding support for or against the Iraq War. This guy is rather savvy and is married into a political family. He is a conservative republican, but more fiscally conservative than the current republican part appears to be. He had by that point developed an opposition to the Iraq War and had some cogent reasons that one might agree or disagree with. This was a panel interview, and the two other candidates answered with positives and negatives of the conflict, staying somewhat away from a firm answer. He on the other hand gave quiet a few encyclopedic answers based on fiscal conservatism. I told him that this was the one medical school that he would not get in. Lo and behold that was exactly what happened. Why? Well there may be some validity do the decision made by the comittee. After all, the other two candidates ambivalence would make them completely approachable by all patients, regardless of their political views. However, what if a pro war republican patient were to attempt and discuss this issue with my good friend? He might not feel that his physician is approachable. I am sure he is smart enough to not get into it with a patient, but the idea here is that the committee wanted to understand whether he could present himself as at least approachable.
The other options of course is the Ernesto Guevara, militant style approach to life. After his time at the leper colony and on the road throughout South America, Che saw things that troubled him regarding disparities. Of course, I cannot endorse his political philosophy (communism), but I think that the same thing that bought him to medicine as a calling, convinced him that he had to take care of the root problem that sets folks up for such dastardly outcomes: change the system to erase the disparities. And of course, the current movements across the world, IRA, AQ, Spanish Militants, even Taliban have so some physicians involved, that it appears that there may be some folks may view the world as Che did and want to fix what they feel is the central issue. In a way, they view my approach, which is to simply stay out of the fray and practice medicine purely, as attempting to treat subarrachinoid hemorrhage or an Aortic dissection/aneurysm burst with a bandaid. However, one has to acknowledge that even Che is viewed by quiet a few people as having a lot of blood on his hands at the end of his life.
I tend to disagree based on my personal preferences. I think that we doctors ought to understand that just because we have MDs does not mean that we are political science experts or that we understand the Art of War the way a savvy general or tactician does. We may be well read on certain subjects, but our doctrate is in medicine and not that particular subject matter.
I am not that worried about my legacy. My ideal way to live the end years and leave this world will be have my wife, kids, and grandkids surrounding me. Possibly on a plot of land in Pashtunkhwa or even in North Carolina, with some shneey chai with the right amount of honey mixed into it and some anaar. If they knew who I was, then I will be content.

Comment