Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistan wants to take over Afghanistan once America leaves

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pakistan wants to take over Afghanistan once America leaves

    Pakistan seeks to exploit US command vacuum
    * Ahmed Rashid says Islamabad is making efforts to influence impending US policy review on Afghanistan to put itself in the driving seat

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is looking to exploit a shake-up in the US command in Afghanistan to bolster its allies within the Taliban and increase its influence over a future Kabul government, analysts say.

    The strategy, however, relies on bringing the brutal and independent-minded Haqqani network to heel, something many believe is impossible.

    The incoming US commander, General David Petraeus, “does not have a good relationship” with Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, said Ahmed Rashid, a political analyst, journalist and expert on the Taliban.

    “The army does not trust him and they don’t like him,” Rashid said. “This hiatus is going to be used by both the Afghan government and the Pakistani government to see if they can get something going,” he added.

    In essence, Pakistan is hoping the American command vacuum proves a window of opportunity for Islamabad to deal more directly with Kabul in forcing an accommodation with its militant allies, such as the Haqqani network.

    This is currently opposed by the United States, but it would grant Pakistan a large measure of influence in Afghanistan.

    After McChrystal’s replacement, Pakistan is hoping to establish a “reality on the ground” before Petraeus fully takes over, said Rashid.

    “I think there will be a review of US policy very quickly as soon as Petraeus arrives and I think these efforts are being made to try and influence that review and put Pakistan in the driving seat,” he said.

    And the Haqqani network and the Taliban is one of the main levers for Pakistan to exert influence.

    “Pakistan is not just prepared but very eager to play a role in bringing peace in Afghanistan,” said Rahimullah Yousafzai, an expert on Taliban militancy.

    Run by Jalaluddin Haqqani, an elderly veteran resistance leader against Soviet troops in the 1980s, the Haqqani network operates near Afghanistan’s border with Pakistan.

    Leadership of the group has largely passed from the ailing Haqqani to his son, Sirajuddin, seen by US officials as more radical than his father. Yousafzai and Rashid both think it would be very difficult to convince the Haqqanis to lay down their arms.

    “He (Sirajuddin) is very committed to international jihad. Part of his network includes al Qaeda, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, other central Asian groups, Chechen groups. He’s been very protective of all these groups and they form his strength right now,” Rashid said.

    “Secondly, they have never, never issued any kind of statement even remotely discussing the issue of reconciliation and peace in Afghanistan,” he said.

    This weekend, a private TV channel Al Jazeera reported that Sirajuddin recently met with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Gen Kayani and the head of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Ahmad Pasha to discuss a peace deal.

    But official sources in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as Taliban spokespeople speaking for Haqqani, strenuously denied any such meeting.

    “The Haqqani group isn’t a separate entity,” said Yousafzai. “Jalaluddin is a member of the supreme Taliban shura. I think it’s impossible that Jalaluddin Haqqani or his son will strike a separate deal with Kabul,” he said.

    The US doubts that any deal can be made until the Haqqanis and other Taliban militants feel they are on the defensive in Afghanistan.

    A senior intelligence official in Islamabad said that while Pakistan would like a “friendly” Afghanistan — which many analysts believe a Taliban-dominated government might provide — Pakistan would settle for peace. “We can deal with a hostile Afghanistan as long as it is peaceful,” he said.d.

    Rashid scoffed at the idea of Pakistan wanting only a peaceful Afghanistan as “propaganda”.

    “Our interest is not just having a peaceful Afghanistan. It’s more than that, certainly. Otherwise we wouldn’t be trying so hard,” he added.

    reuters

    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...-6-2010_pg7_12

  • #2
    Haqqani is a member of the Taliban Shura. His son who is in command of his Army of Terrorists and Suicide bombers has met with Karzai under the supervison of Army general Keyani and ISI general Pacha.

    This shows that Taliban is not Anti Pakistan in true essence and neither does Taliban represent Pashtun interests.

    Kind Regards

    Comment


    • #3
      Afghan taliban are no way and again no way against pakistan army. Whenever Pakistan army is blamed for terrorism in Afghanistan, Afgahn taliban reject the blame before Pakistan army rejects. It shows much strong ties between them, and my opinion is that they are winning and West and Karzai are at the defensive positions. Kiyani in Kabul as a conqurer and karzai requesting him to help. This situation is very dangerous for future. Punjabi can be better as a subordinate but never as a boss. It is their psychie.
      Khoshal khan Khattak says:

      Ettefaq me pukhtana ke paida na ka
      gani ma ba da mughal greban para kar

      we are in the same situation,long beard big turban traitors with clena sahved paint shirt tie bosses are conquering.
      situation is going bakc to 1996. That time Dr najeeb was martyred brutally, and this time perhaps Karzai (Allah de na okki) will be martyred.

      Comment


      • #4
        if ahmed rashid says so, then it must be true.
        [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
        [/URL]
        [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
        [/URL][/SIZE]
        Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

        Comment


        • #5
          prepare yourself for the return of Islamic fascist.
          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Comment


          • #6
            This is a depressing yet true article. The recent diplomatic activities of the senior members of Pakistan's armed forces suggest only this.
            "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

            "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

            Comment


            • #7
              man why the hell can't pakistan army leave afghanistan alone peace!!??? what peace it is a step towards an evil civil war for afghanisthan (will amrurrah saleh, and other ethenic groups including a large section of the pashton accept this so-called peace deal ?) where I.S.I plans to call the shots why cant the people afghanisthan realize this TRAP. seriously trust me though i am an outsider i think none but the people of afghanisthan will be responsible for another period of turbulence by not speaking up against this sinister intensions of na-pakistan .
              “Coffee and love are best when they are hot.”

              A German proverb

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Afghanprincess
                Why is Pakistan all on it's knees for influence in Afghanistan?
                Pakistan fears a strong independent Afghanistan cause Afghans are known as the rulers of Hindustan. They fear we would raise the Pashtunistan issue. They fear we would make an alliance with India to destroy Pakistan. They have two border disputes already (Kashmir and Pashtunkhwa). They want to enslave Afghanistan forever and play Pashtuns like puppets. They want us to work for them like to serve in their military or to play cricket for them. They also want to keep FATA and NWFP semi-autonomous so they can play a tribal chess game. Maybe they can force Pashtuns to start war with India one day=). They have plans, mane! But we wont let them.
                I'd rather lay em all down de neeka gano pa tseer^^!

                Comment


                • #9
                  I know but who cares? Daud Khan didnt. A. and P. were on the verge of war several times over Pashtunistan. Its just a matter of time when (strong and independent) A. raises this issue again and then declares war on P. They cant do this right now and the reasons for that you know already^^.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by borgza View Post
                    man why the hell can't pakistan army leave afghanistan alone peace!!??? what peace it is a step towards an evil civil war for afghanisthan (will amrurrah saleh, and other ethenic groups including a large section of the pashton accept this so-called peace deal ?) where I.S.I plans to call the shots why cant the people afghanisthan realize this TRAP. seriously trust me though i am an outsider i think none but the people of afghanisthan will be responsible for another period of turbulence by not speaking up against this sinister intensions of na-pakistan .
                    What is this Mr????
                    Mind your language plz
                    [FONT=Arial][SIZE=4][COLOR=darkred]Barking Dogs Seldom Bite...![/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
                    :fighting:

                    LONG LIVE UNITED PAKISTAN

                    ([B]Balochi + Sindi + Punjabi + Pashtoon + Chitrali + Kashmiri = My Sweet Pakistan[/B])

                    Jeeway Jeeway Pakistan

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kandahary
                      We have so much proof that Pakistan = International migraine.

                      I created a thread asking for unity. every Pakistani entered and said no to unity. How we should not unify.

                      the tajik punjabi thread.
                      I didn't get it. Unity with whom?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Unification of pashtuns

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Kandahary
                          We have so much proof that Pakistan = International migraine.

                          I created a thread asking for unity. every Pakistani entered and said no to unity. How we should not unify.

                          the tajik punjabi thread.
                          Kandahary please don't misrepresent people's positions. People were for the unification of Pashtunkhwa and Afghanistan not Afghanistan and Pakistan. How on earth you justified unifying panjab and sindh with Afghanistan is beyond me.
                          http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Kandahary
                            We have so much proof that Pakistan = International migraine.

                            I created a thread asking for unity. every Pakistani entered and said no to unity. How we should not unify.

                            the tajik punjabi thread.
                            i wish for that too but pashtuns are racists by default.

                            We consider every other race inferior to us
                            Intezar che pa salgo sho no ta raghley
                            Che me jwand pa dobedo sho no ta raghley.....

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Sher Khan View Post
                              i wish for that too but pashtuns are racists by default.

                              We consider every other race inferior to us

                              It is your introspective analysis which most probably reflects your own mentality.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X