Gurkha who beheaded Taliban soldier in Afghanistan battle cleared to return to duty

[IamDZJ]

he needed an entire head for DNA identification?? Sometimes I wonder if they go around their mental institutes and pick up the most demented ones with good physical health and put them to use out there. It's more like he thought it it a good idea to have something to tell of the war he fought in his youth to his grandchildren someday... And he is back to his "duty"...that is wrong.

[Alchemist]

Arabs are foreigners, are they not?
ISI are foreigners, are they not?

You want to call Kayani your countryman, and everybody else a foreigner. Then go and make Pakjabi flag your avatar photo. Why pretend?

You are actually right buddy...

400,000 Americans and westerners are actually native to afghanistan so that those 100 arabs and 400 isi pakistanis posing as afghans would get kicked out. Brilliant!


now please ..stfu!

[sanman]

None of them are calling themselves native to Afghanistan - it's ISI and Pakjabi dropouts (madrassa graduates) who are posing as Afghans, and invading their neighbor to the north.

Arabs, Chechens, Somalis, Pakjabis, etc - all of them seem more interested in hanging out in Afghanistan than in their own miserable wretched lands.

Oh, and British kids too - these Pakistani immigrants always let their kids fall into drugs, and then when they get into trouble, they send them off to Afghanistan for "Haqqani spiritual training course". Pakistani immigrant kids are worst drug users.

[khushal]

None of them are calling themselves native to Afghanistan - it's ISI and Pakjabi dropouts (madrassa graduates) who are posing as Afghans, and invading their neighbor to the north.

Arabs, Chechens, Somalis, Pakjabis, etc - all of them seem more interested in hanging out in Afghanistan than in their own miserable wretched lands.

Oh, and British kids too - these Pakistani immigrants always let their kids fall into drugs, and then when they get into trouble, they send them off to Afghanistan for "Haqqani spiritual training course". Pakistani immigrant kids are worst drug users.

whats funny is that Scimitar who thinks of himself as a scholar agrees with an idiot like you. you two are funny people.

[R3SISTANC3]

I don't blame the Gurkha soldier. I don't even blame the Afghan government. The people who are responsible for all this carnage are those Arabs who used Afghanistan as their base to constantly attack the US and its allies everywhere around the world. And when the US came to seek revenge with an array of some of the deadliest weapons known to man, what do those Arabs do? They run away with their wives, some shave their beards, others put on burkhas and they seek refuge with their Punjabi masters in Karachi, Islamabad, Abbotabad, etc.

Where are those Arabs and their allies now? Why did they invite the US to invade Afghanistan? Why are they not defending the Afghan people anymore? Just like in the 1970s when the US and its allies lured the Soviets in Afghanistan to slowly defeat them at the cost of Pashtun blood, Al-Qaeda has lured the US into Afghanistan to see it defeated at the cost of Pashtun blood. The sooner we realize who our enemies are, the better.

Afghanistan must never become a base for global Jihadists at any cost. As it is, these mad men have turned Afghanistan into the most backward place in the world and, on top of that, they have invited such brutal and immoral enemies to our homeland.

I agree with you but those who claim to be the custodians of humanistic values should realize this and stop butchering poor/innocent Afghans. The hijackers were not Afghans, and Osama wasn't caught in Tora Bora hiding in a cave. They know all of this, yet finance those that create/support these "terrorists". In that case resisting such duplicity becomes an obligation.

The questions you should be asking is that why did the US attack Afghanistan when the hijackers were Arabs (16 of them Saudi)?

The question you should be asking is why didn't the US take up the Taliban offer to hand Osama over to Saudi or Pakistan?

The question you should be asking is what was the need for preemptively waging war on the Afghan nation and people over the action of a single mad lunatic?

The question you should be asking is if they could have taken out Osama, just like they did in that secretive super duper macho gizmo technological way they did in Abbotabad, what was the reason to bomb Afghanistan to oblivion....why, because they could? In that case they are criminals regardless of what justification you provide. That means they were going to ATTACK AFGHANISTAN ANYWAY! Even if some Arab had farted next to the World Trade Center, they were going to kill innocent Afghans because it was action time Texa's style baby!

Taliban are bad, they are monsters, they eat little babies..whatever, but that was no justification to go to war with them. They didn't support any global jihadist agenda, they were only concerned with their country. There is no evidence even linking Osama to the 9/11 attacks, only those he knew like KSM who was the true master mind, while Osama was just a poster child.

Now if that's not enough, WHY DID THEY INVADE IRAQ? Was there Al-Qeada in Iraq? Were there Taliban in Iraq? Complete nonsense! It was Yellow Cake! It was the WMD's! It was secret support to Al-Qeada! If they can lie about all of that, what else have they lied about and can they lie about? What makes you think that those who are statistically proven to be pathological liars, wouldn't lie about the whole thing with Afghanistan?

Studies now show that there is an overwhelmingly high numbers of clinical sociopaths running major corporations in the West. The same study showed that many people in power, political positions, can be classified as sociopaths. So what makes you think that now, proven scientifically, these sociopaths would tell the truth and care about human lives?

When Bush giggles and laughs about millions of dead Iraqis, you think he is sane? You think that it takes a pious, genuine, caring, humanistic heart/person to reach the positions that these people have? Seriously? You think being honest, having integrity, empathy, can land you such a powerful position?

[randolph85]

i never understood why gurkhas are considered "warriors," all these people are known for is working for foreigners, namely the british and all their praise comes from them lol

[Ghurkha]

You must understand, a Gurkha when he draws his blade in battle in front of men who wish to kill him or his brothers, British or Nepalese, cannot put his blade back until he has drawn the blood of the enemy. The fact he took the head of the enemy is not a strange occurred, the Gurkha's did the same many times against the Japanese in previous battles.

Im surprised that Afghan warriors do not understand the practice of taking the enemies head as a battle trophy?, do you not practice the same with captured infidels?, we are merely playing with the same rules and now it seems you are all upset about this, please explain to me why one rule exists for you and another for us?

Or better don't waste your time, because as the Ghurka's say, "Better to take an enemies head than a break from the battle...."

[randolph85]

^ afghan warriors don't understand working for foreigners and being proud of the fact. being a mercenary is shameful, attaching some warrior code to it is laughable.

[Admin Khan]

Ghurkha,
I don't even know if I should take your post serious. Is that a joke? You, warriors? Or more like British mercenaries?

[khushal]

A slave that kills is still a slave. A slave that kills and is proud of it, thats just plain shamefuly stupid.
to fight for freedom with all odds against you, thats the warrior spirit.

Gurkhas, warriors, hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
Baby Laughing Insanely - YouTube

[R3SISTANC3]

Gurkha warriors? Hiding behind the superior technology of your cowardic anglo masters, not fighting on even terms, even grounds, participating in the invasion and slaughter of innocents.....that is warriors? The British praised their loyal hunting dogs like the Gurkhas because they were good pets. Yet the British praised the Afghans without the Afghans selling themselves into bondage.

The Gurkha sword is yielded by enslaved cowards. The Afghan sword (TURRAY) has always been held by FREE and INDEPENDENT men of true honor and dignity. The Afghan challenges all the Gurkhas to stop hiding behind the skirts of the White man machines. Fight in the open, fight like men. Don't call your fighters jets and bombers when you are about to wet your pants. Your sword is only good for cutting grass maintaining your White overlord cricket field.