A Christian woman was raped for four days; the rapist identified himself as a senior

[Notorious Pashtana]

you were also not there but nobody could give evidence of gang rape though the whole media, govt, police and everyone was supporting mukhtara but still they could not give evidence of gang rape. only one was proved and sentenced.
Courts always give decisions on evidence. courts are impartial.

yes the courts can only give decisions on evidence and its the collection of evidence that proves a problem in a corrupt society.

[faye]

no, you are wrong. only one committed the crime and he was sentenced by the court... It was not actually a gang rape.

they all committed the crime if they waatched it happen and didn't do anything to stop it!

[emkhan]

yes the courts can only give decisions on evidence and its the collection of evidence that proves a problem in a corrupt society.

Again it was not a gang rape and the court decision was 100% correct.
But i wonder nobody cares for those remaining accused who were kept in jailed since the incident took place... who is responsible for that ? Can mukhtara compensate that ?

[khashayar]

people need to be educated on the false sense of honor etc.......like raping somehow brings honor back

there also needs to be a system where influential people of villages/towns are vetted..because they normally dish out ridicolus verdicts/punishments in their jirgas

everyone needs to follow law of the land, but as prevvious members have stated a corrupt society can hardly put confidence into its citizens.

[khashayar]

Again it was not a gang rape and the court decision was 100% correct.
But i wonder nobody cares for those remaining accused who were kept in jailed since the incident took place... who is responsible for that ? Can mukhtara compensate that ?

it is shameful u r not condemning this atrocity but asking for compensation from a victim

[Notorious Pashtana]

Again it was not a gang rape and the court decision was 100% correct.
But i wonder nobody cares for those remaining accused who were kept in jailed since the incident took place... who is responsible for that ? Can mukhtara compensate that ?

get real you chauvinistic so and so, somone got raped and your worried about compensating spectators? sick.

[emkhan]

they all committed the crime if they waatched it happen and didn't do anything to stop it!

There is no law in the world that someone sees a crime and don't stop it so who is equally responsible for the crime... You have to make amendments for that in the parliament.

[Notorious Pashtana]

it is shameful u r not condemning this atrocity but asking for compensation from a victim

he seems to be siding with the obvious rapists.

emkhan if she wasnt gang raped then she wouldnt be fighting against it for so many years. you know what this has done? given way to jirga's to order rapes more freely. enjoy it.

[emkhan]

it is shameful u r not condemning this atrocity but asking for compensation from a victim

I am condemning the crime. But Notorious says the court released the rest so i said the court did it because it was not a gang rape... i just asked what about those 11 who were kept in the jail ?

[Notorious Pashtana]

I am condemning the crime. But Notorious says the court released the rest so i said the court did it because it was not a gang rape... i just asked what about those 11 who were kept in the jail ?

awww bless you, you condemn the crime but you're worried about the criminals, how sweet.

[IamDZJ]

certain topics are very popular in here.

[faye]

why are you concerned about 11 men who allowed a woman to be raped, emkhan? whether there is a law about it or not, they are still to be held responsible in the eyes of humanity.(in my view)

[emkhan]

awww bless you, you condemn the crime but you're worried about the criminals, how sweet.

who will decide they were criminal ? you ?

[Bengal_Tiger]

why are you concerned about 11 men who allowed a woman to be raped, emkhan? whether there is a law about it or not, they are still to be held responsible in the eyes of humanity.(in my view)

I think in legal parlance being an "accomplice" to the crime is equal to commiting the crime itself. It is like saying "oh don't put him in prison, he didn't rape her....he just tied her up with a rope."

In the UK they say "aiding and abetting" a crime is criminal in itself.

[IamDZJ]

who will decide they were criminal ? you ?

and who will decide they are not criminals? you?
do you get paid for propagating for them???? do you??? how much do you get paid emkhan? you have to tell me. it's your turn to speak.
you sound so confident that they didn't do it..