Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ask an American, agnostic and atheist man pretty much anything

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by DaZahroJaam. View Post
    i am not comfortable with either one of those terms on their own and together they might defy each other... I m okay with not being sure as long as I keep on searching. If I do figure it out, good. If I don't, pretending surely won't get me anything.
    That's acceptable. I can understand not being comfortable with the terms -- or seeing them as contradictory. Like I said, I am far from an expert on Islam. On the surface, they do not seem to contradict -- but that's why I am here, to understand how others view the world.
    -------------------------------------------------

    "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

    أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
    (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ozymandias View Post
      ... understanding that ultimately it is impossible to conclusively prove or disprove the existence of that god.
      when you state something for which you have no proof, why don't you say, 'i think....' or 'i believe...' because this is only your personal belief, an assumption. it is not something that has been proven.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ozymandias View Post
        but that's why I am here, to understand how others view the world.
        lol..all you have been doing, is dismissing, how others see the world. that is not' understanding'.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by faye View Post
          when you state something for which you have no proof, why don't you say, 'i think....' or 'i believe...' because this is only your personal belief, an assumption. it is not something that has been proven.
          In this case, this is not a personal belief nor an assumption. By definition the supernatural is something that exists outside the scope of science. It would be your favourite perjorative, sciencism, to pretend that science can prove or disprove something that by definition is outside the scope of science.
          -------------------------------------------------

          "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

          "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

          أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
          (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

          Comment


          • Originally posted by faye View Post
            lol..all you have been doing, is dismissing, how others see the world. that is not' understanding'.
            I'm only dismissing you because you are here to troll, and have no intention to have an actual conversation.
            -------------------------------------------------

            "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

            "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

            أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
            (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

            Comment


            • who said that science is the one NEEDED,to give verification about god/allah/intelligent creator? not me.

              but as a scientist, you are trying to tell others what cannot be proven. still acting as the dogmatist.

              dogmatist; an arrogantly assertive person.
              Last edited by faye; 01-24-2013, 07:15 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by faye View Post
                who said that science is the one NEEDED,to give verification about god/allah/intelligent creator? not me.
                The definition of 'proof'.

                proof

                /pro͞of/
                Noun
                Evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.


                fact

                /fakt/
                Noun
                • A thing that is indisputably the case.
                • Information used as evidence or as part of a report or news article.




                For most people, these definitions are pretty close to the ones they use when having a casual conversation.


                but as a scientist, you are trying to tell others what cannot be proven. still acting as the dogmatist.
                I'm sorry you think it is dogmatic to use the English definitions of words when having a conversation in English.


                dogmatist; an arrogantly assertive person.
                You are welcome to feel I am being arrogant for knowing definitions of common words.
                -------------------------------------------------

                "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

                "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

                أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
                (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

                Comment


                • i have my own personal experiences as my own verification about an intelligent creator. so scientists are not needed for that, i agree.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by faye View Post
                    i have my own personal experiences as my own verification about an intelligent creator. so scientists are not needed for that, i agree.
                    Which takes full circle back to the statement you had a problem with in the first place. Since your experiences don't establish the existence, or non-existence of a god as a fact, and thus they are not proof, and thus you have still failed to prove my statement wrong.

                    If subjective experiences constituted proof, mutually exclusive items would both be true, which, logically, is a problem.
                    -------------------------------------------------

                    "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

                    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

                    أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
                    (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

                    Comment


                    • proof enough for me and others, just as scientific verification is your supplier of what you choose to believe and have faith in.
                      difference is, as i stated before, i am secure in my knowledge as it is my own.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by faye View Post
                        proof enough for me and others, just as scientific verification is your supplier of what you choose to believe and have faith in.
                        difference is, as i stated before, i am secure in my knowledge as it is my own.
                        Good for you. You believe what you want to believe. Have fun with that.
                        -------------------------------------------------

                        "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

                        "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

                        أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
                        (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

                        Comment


                        • i am, even without your permission.

                          Comment


                          • I found this book in my collection last night and was constantly reminded of this thread while I was reading it. Has any of you read this??


                            "To burn always with this hard gemlike flame, to maintain this ecstasy, is success in life."





                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by DaZahroJaam. View Post
                              I found this book in my collection last night and was constantly reminded of this thread while I was reading it. Has any of you read this??

                              An interesting read if you have time to spare.
                              Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                              A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                              For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                              The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                              -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                              Comment


                              • Looks like I will have to pick that one up... Thanks!
                                -------------------------------------------------

                                "There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

                                "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

                                أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
                                (I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X